454
R. G. PANARI, R. B. CHOUGALE AND S. T. NANDIBEWOOR
4. D. G. Lee. in Oxidation in Organic Chemistry, edited by W. S.
Trahanovsky, Part D. p. 147, Academic Press, New York (1982).
5. L. I. Simandi. in The Chemistry of Functional Groups, edited by S.
Patai and Z. Rappoport, Suppl. C, Chapt. 13. Wiley, Chichester
(1983).
6. D. G. Lee, E. G. Lee and K. C. Brown. Phase Transfer Catalysis,
New Chemistry, Catalysts and Applications, ACS Symposium
Series No. 326, p. 82. American Chemical Society, Washington,
DC (1987).
dielectric constant and r and r* refer to the radius of the
reacting species and activated complex, respectively. It
can be seen from Eqn (6) that the rate should be greater in
a medium of lower dielectric constant when r* > r. There
is a possibility of intramolecular hydrogen bonding that
could stabilize the transition state, increasing the size of
activated complex by attracting solvent molecules due to
solvation effect. The fairly high positive values of DH≠
and DG≠ (Table 2) also indicate that the transition state is
highly solvated, which results in an increase in the size of
transition state. It is likely that r* > r for mandelic acid,
thus explaining the experimental observations. Hence
one can expect intramolecular hydrogen bonding in
mandelic acid since it contains OH and COOH groups on
the same carbon atom. Such hydrogen bonding is
common for molecules having COOH and NH2, COOH
and OH groups, etc., either on the adjacent carbon atom
or on the same carbon atom of the molecule as found29 in
simple amino acids.
7. A. J. Fatiadi. Synthesis 85 (1987).
8. J. F. Perez-Benito and D. G. Lee. J. Org. Chem. 52, 3239 (1987).
9. L. I. Simandi, M. Jaky and Z. A. Schelly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107,
4220 (1985).
10. U. Chandraiah, C. P. Murthy and S. Kandlikar. Indian J. Chem.
28A, 162 (1989); S. C. Pati and Y. Sriramulu. Proc. Indian Acad.
Sci., Sect. A 87, 87 (1978); A. Shukla and S. K. Upadhyay. Indian
J. Chem. 30A, 154 (1991).
11. K. K. Benerji. Tetrahedron 29, 1401 (1973); G. V. Bakore, R.
Shankar and U. Goyal. Indian J. Chem. 1, 331 (1963).
12. U. Chandraiah, C. P. Murthy and S. Kandlikar. Indian J. Chem.
28A, 162 (1989); A. Shukla and S. K. Upadhyay. Indian J. Chem.
30A, 154 (1991).
13. J. Szammer, M. Jaky and O. V. Germasimov. Int. J. Chem. Kinet.
24, 145 (1992); M. Jaky, I. V. Kozhevnikov and E. Hoft. Int. J.
Chem. Kinet. 24, 1055 (1992).
The moderate values of DH≠ and DS≠ were both
favourable for electron transfer processes. The value of
DH≠ was due to release of energy of solution changes in
the transition state. The negative values of DS≠ within the
range for radical reactions have been ascribed30 to the
nature of electron pairing and electron unpairing
processes, and to the loss of degrees of freedom, formerly
available to the reactions on the formation of a rigid
transition state. It is also interesting that the oxidant
species [MnOꢀ4 ] required a pH > 12, below which the
system becomes disturbed and the reaction will proceed
further to give a reduced product of the oxidant as
Mn(IV), which slowly develops yellow turbidity. Hence
it becomes apparent that in carrying out this reaction the
role of pH in the reaction medium is crucial. It is also
noteworthy that under the conditions studied, the reaction
occurs in two successive one-electron reductions
(Scheme 3) rather than two-electron reduction in a single
step (Scheme 2).
14. (a) L. I. Simandi, M. Jaky and Z. A. Schelly. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
107, 4220 (1985); (b) P. L. Timmanagoudar, G. A. Hiremath and S.
T. Nandibewoor. Transition Met. Chem. 22, 193 (1997); (c) P. L.
Timmanagoudar, G. A. Hiremath and S. T. Nandibewoor. Pol. J.
Chem. 70, 1459 (1996); (d) S. Nadimpalli, R. Rallabandi and L. S.
A. Dikshitulu. Transition Met. Chem. 18, 510 (1993).
15. A. I. Vogel. Text Book of Quantitative Chemical Analysis. 5th ed.,
p. 371. ELBS, New York (1989).
16. A. Carrington and M. C. R. Symons. J. Chem. Soc. 3373 (1956).
17. F. Feigl. Spot Tests in Organic Analysis. pp. 195–201. Elsevier,
New York (1975).
18. A. Shukla and S. K. Upadhyay. Indian J. Chem. 30A, 154 (1991).
19. G. H. Hugar and S. T. Nandibewoor. Transition Met. Chem. 19,
215 (1994).
20. S. Vivekanandan, K. Venkatarao, M. Santappa and Sp. Shan-
muganathan. Indian J. Chem. 22A, 244 (1983).
21. G. H. Hugar and S. T. Nandibewoor. Indian J. Chem. 32A, 1056
(1993); S. M. Tuwar, S. T. Nandibewoor and J. R. Raju. J. Indian
Chem. Soc. 69, 651 (1992); S. M. Tuwar, S. T. Nandibewoor and J.
R. Raju. Transition Met. Chem. 16, 196 (1991); J. Devi, S. Kothari
and K. K. Banerji. Indian J. Chem. 34A, 116 (1995).
22. K. A. K. Lott and M. C. R. Symons. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 29, 205
(1960); M. Jaky, Z. Szeverenyi and L. I. Simandi. Inorg. Chim.
Acta 186, 33 (1991); R. G. Panari, R. B. Chougale and S. T.
Nandibewoor. Pol. J. Chem. 72, 99 (1998).
23. E. A. Moelwyn-Hughes. The Kinetics of Reaction in Solutions.
Clarendon Press, Oxford (1947); E. A. Moelwyn-Hughes. Physical
Chemistry, 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, New York (1961).
24. K. J. Laidler and H. Eyring. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 39, 303 (1940); K.
J. Laidler and P. A. Landskroener. Trans. Faraday Soc. 52, 200
(1957); K. J. Laidler. Reaction Kinetics. Pergamon Press, New
York (1963).
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Dr S. M. Tuwar of Karnatak Science
College, Dharwad, for valuable discussions.
25. S. W. Benson. The Foundations of Chemical Kinetics. McGraw-
Hill, New York (1960).
26. A. A. Frost and R. G. Pearson. Kinetics and Mechanism, 2nd ed.
Wiley, New York (1961).
27. E. S. Amis. Solvent Effects on Reaction Rates and Mechanisms.
Academic Press, New York (1966).
REFERENCES
28. S. G. Entelis and R. P. Tiger. Reaction Kinetics in the Liquid
Phase. Wiley, New York (1976).
29. L. Pauling. The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd ed., p. 449
Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY (1960).
30. C. Wallilng. Free Radicals in solution, p. 38 Acadmeic Press, New
York (1957).
1. R. Stewart. in Oxidations in Organic Chemistry, edited by K. B.
Wiberg, Part A, Chapt. 1. Academic Press, New York (1965).
2. F. Freeman. Rev. React. Species Chem. React. 1, 179 (1976).
3. D. G. Lee. The Oxidation of Organic Compounds by Permanga-
nate Ion and Hexavalent Chromium. Open Court, La Salle, IL
(1980).
1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ORGANIC CHEMISTRY, VOL. 11, 448–454 (1998)