Puttaswamy et al.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 76, No. 1 (2003)
Table 7. Temperature Dependence and Activation Parameters for the Oxidation of Amino
79
−
4
−3
4
Acids by BAB in HClO medium, [BAB] = 4.0 × 10 mol dm ; [Amino Acid] = 4.0
−
2
−3
−2
−3
−3
×
10 mol dm ; [HClO
4
] = 4.0 × 10 mol dm ; I = 0.5 mol dm
3
−1
Temperature
K
10 kꢀ/s
Valine
Glycine
1.03
Leucine
3.70
5.30
8.25
12.2
18.1
65.7
63.0
−83.9
89.3
Alanine
Phenylglycine
8.82
3
3
3
3
3
E
∆
∆
∆
03
08
13
18
23
4.65
7.35
10.5
15.9
21.6
61.3
58.7
−95.8
88.7
6.05
8.25
1.62
2.50
3.95
6.45
11.1
12.0
15.7
16.1
23.9
53.8
51.8
19.4
23.8
41.8
39.2
/kJ mol−
1
74.1
71.5
−66.9
92.5
a
−
1
H /kJ mol
−
1
−1
S /J K mol
−112
86.1
−155
87.6
G /kJ mol−
1
identical experimental conditions. The rate of oxidation of
amino acids increased in the order phenylglycine > alanine >
valine > leucine > glycine (Table 7), while in the case of
dipeptides the order was found to be Phg-Phg > Ala-Ala >
Val-Val > Leu-Leu > Gly-Gly. It was also found that the ami-
no acids are nearly 10-times faster than the dipeptides. The
change in each case can be ascribed to the increased distance
between the functional groups and consequently weaker elec-
trostatic effects. In the case of dipeptides, a lone pair on nitro-
gen [Scheme 2, (X)] is involved in resonance with the carbonyl
group. Therefore, its nucleophilic character will decrease and,
hence, the rate decreases, where as in the case of monomer
amino acids there is no decrease in the nucleophilic character
and, hence, the rate is much faster compared to dipeptides.
The decrease in the rate for dipeptides compared to their
monomers may also be due to decreased ionization of the
Chem. Kinet., 33, 480 (2001).
B. Thimme Gowda and D. S. Mahadevappa, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 1983, 323, and references therein.
D. S. Mahadevappa, Puttaswamy, and S. Ananda, Indian J.
Chem., Sect. A, 26, 33 (1987).
Puttaswamy and Nirmala Vaz, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.,
Chem. Sci., 113, 325 (2001).
D. K. Bhat, B. S. Sherigara, and B. Thimme Gowda, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 69, 41 (1996).
T. A. Iyengar and D. S. Mahadevappa, Proc. Indian Acad.
Sci., Chem. Sci., 105, 63 (1993).
S. Akabori, K. Narita, K. Toki, and H. Hanafusa, Nippon
Kagaku Zasshi (J. Chem. Soc. Jpn., Pure Chem. Sec.,) 75, 782
8
9
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
(
1954).
E. F. Hammel and S. Glasstone, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76,
741 (1954).
1
4
3
1
5
M. S. Ahmed and D. S. Mahadevappa, Talanta, 27, 669
COOH group, which is evidenced by an increase in the pK
values (e.g. glycine pK = 2.4; Gly-Gly pK = 3.4). Since the
1
(
1980).
1
1
1
6
M. Bodanszky and A. Bodanszky, “The Practice of Peptide
availability of the COOH group for this reaction is trivial to de-
termine the rate, the rate concurrently decreases due to a lower
concentration of the acidity, resulting in a decrease of the dis-
sociation ability of the COOH group and, hence, a decrease in
the rate of the reaction in the case of dipeptides. The same ar-
gument also holds good for other four dipeptides.
Synthesis,” Springer-Verlag, New York (1984), pp. 145–150.
17 G. Akerloff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 54, 4125 (1932).
18 A. I. Vogel “Text Book of Practical Organic Chemistry,”
5th ed, ELBS and Longman, London (1989), p. 1332.
19 Puttaswamy and D. S. Mahadevappa, J. Phys. Org. Chem.,
2, 660 (1989).
2
0
A. I. Vogel, “Quantitative Inorganic Analysis,” 4th ed,
ELBS and Longman, London (1978), p. 313.
One of the authors (NV) thanks the Principal and the Man-
agement of Jyoti Nivas College, Bangalore for encouragement
and also the UGC-New Delhi for a Fellowship.
2
2
1
2
E. Bishop and V.J. Jennings, Talanta, 1, 197 (1958).
J. C. Morris, J. A. Salazar, and M. A. Wineman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 70, 2036 (1948).
F. F. Hardy and J. P. Johnston, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2
3
References
2
, 1973, 742.
1
1978).
2
M. M. Campbell and G. Johnson, Chem. Rev., 78, 65
24 L. F. Fieser and M. Fieser, “Organic Chemistry,” D. C.
Health, Boston (1958), p. 417.
25 F. Haurowitz, “Chemistry and Biology of Proteins,” Aca-
demic Press, New York (1950).
(
K. K. Banerji, B. Jayaram, and D. S. Mahadevappa, J. Sci.
Ind. Res., 46, 65 (1987).
3
Puttaswamy, T. M. Anuradha, R. Ramachandrappa, and N.
26 R. J. L. Martin, Nature, 771 (1955).
M. Made Gowda, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 32, 221 (2000).
27 R. L. Synge, Biochem. J., 39, 351 (1945).
28 J. E. House, “Principles of Chemical Kinetics,” Wm. C.
Brown Publishers, Boston (1997).
4
Puttaswamy, D. S. Mahadevappa, and K. S. Rangappa,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 62, 3343 (1989).
5
1985).
6
S. Kothari and K. K. Banerji, Can. J. Chem., 63, 2726
29 E. S. Amis, “Solvent Effects on Reaction Rates and Mecha-
nisms,” Academic Press, New York (1966).
30 K. J. Laidler, “Chemical Kinetics,” Tata McGraw Hill,
India (1965), p. 227.
(
B. M. Venkatesh, S. Ananda, and D. S. Mahadevappa,
Indian J. Chem., Sect. A, 32, 814 (1992).
Puttaswamy, Nirmala Vaz, and N. M. Made Gowda, Int. J.
7
31 C. J. Collins and N. S. Bowman, “Isotope Effect in Chemi-