1
88
P.S. Niphadkar et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 401 (2011) 182–188
100
M50 indicating the dependence of stability on a synergy between
Lewis and Brønsted acid sites in Al-Sn-MFI.
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Acknowledgments
P.S.N. is grateful to Director, National Chemical Laboratory,
Pune, India for his support and permission to work for Ph.D.
References
[
1] S. Narayanan, V. Durgakumari, A.S. Rao, Appl. Catal. A 111 (1994) 133–142.
Aniline conversion over M50
Aniline conversion over M25
NMA selectivity over M50
NMA selectivity over M25
[2] J. Santhanalakshmi, T. Raja, Appl. Catal. A 147 (1996) 69–80.
[
3] S. Sunwanprasop, T. Nhujak, S. Roengsumran, A. Petsom, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
3 (2004) 4973–4978.
4] S.R. Stauffer, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 6977–6985.
4
[
[5] J.S. Kim, O.J. Shon, J.A. Rim, S.K. Kim, J. Yoon, J. Org. Chem. 67 (2002) 2348–2351.
[
[
6] M. Nehate, V.V. Bokade, Appl. Clay Sci. 44 (2009) 255–258.
7] F.M. Baustista, J.M. Campelo, G.D. Luna, J.M. Marinas, A.A. Romero, M.R. Urbano,
J. Catal. 172 (1997) 103–109.
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
[8] F.M. Baustista, J.M. Campelo, G.D. Luna, J.M. Marinas, A.A. Romero, Appl. Catal.
A 166 (1998) 39–45.
Time h
[
9] L.J. Garces, V.D. Makwana, B. Hincapie, A. Sacco, S.L. Suib, J. Catal. 217 (2003)
07–116.
1
Fig. 9. Stability test for M50 and M25 catalysts under optimum reaction conditions
[
10] I.I. Ivanova, E.B. Pomakhina, A.I. Rebrov, M. Hunger, Y.G. Kolyagin, J. Weitkamp,
J. Catal. 203 (2001) 375–381.
◦ −1
temperature: 220 C, mole ratio: 1.8, and WHSV: 3h ).
(
[
[
[
11] V.D. Stytsenko, T.D. Huu, V.A. Vinokurov, Kinet. Catal. 46 (2005) 376–379.
12] German patent 3942413, 1991.
13] V.D. Stysenko, V.A. Vinokurov, Scientific Conf. of Russian State University of Oil
and Gas on the Catalytic Synthesis of Blending Fuels and Antioxidants, Mascow,
1999, p. 151.
stability test under optimum reaction conditions. The alkylation of
◦
−1
aniline with methanol was carried out at 220 C with WHSV = 3 h
using feed containing aniline and methanol in the molar ratio of
:8. The results with regard to product distribution as a function
[14] A. Ko, C. Yang, W. Zhu, H. Lin, Appl. Catal. A 134 (1996) 53–66.
[15] M. Vijayaraj, C.S. Gopinath, J. Catal. 241 (2006) 83–95.
[16] K. Sreekumara, T. Rajab, B.P. Kiranb, S. Sugunana, B.S. Rao, Appl. Catal. A 182
(1999) 327–336.
1
of reaction time up to 10 h are shown in Fig. 9. M50 catalyst was
found to be stable up to 10 h and has shown the stable aniline
conversion and NMA selectivity of the order 36–67% and 69–86%,
respectively. As compared to M50, M25 has shown less stabil-
ity, which has reflected in the drop in conversion from 8th hour.
This phenomenon may be attributed to the higher Brønsted/Lewis
acidity ratio of M25 as compared to M50. Thus, it seems that,
there exist a synergy between Lewis and Brønsted acid sites in
Al-Sn-MFI in aniline N-methylation reaction and catalyst stability
as well.
[17] Y.K. Park, K. Park, S. Woo, Catal. Lett. 26 (1994) 169–180.
[18] C. Yang, N. He, Q. Xu, J. Incl. Phenom. Macro. 35 (1999) 123–130.
[19] B.L. Su, D. Barthomeuf, Appl. Catal. A 124 (1995) 73–80.
[20] S.P. Elangovan, C. Kannan, B. Arabindoo, V. Murugesn, Appl. Catal. A 174 (1998)
213–219.
[21] G.D. Yadav, N.S. Doshi, J. Mol. Catal. A 194 (2003) 195–209.
[22] S. Narayanan, K. Deshpande, J. Mol. Catal. A 104 (1995) L109–113.
[23] S. Narayanan, B.P. Prasad, J. Mol. Catal. A 96 (1995) 57–64.
[24] R. Luque, J.M. Campelo, D. Luna, J.M. Marinas, A.A. Romero, J. Mol. Catal. A 269
2007) 190–196.
25] S.I. Woo, J.K. Lee, B.S. Hong, Y.K. Park, Y.S. Uh, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 49B (1989)
095–1103.
26] P.Y. Chen, M.C. Chen, H.Y. Chu, N.S. Chang, T.K. Chuang, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 28
1986) 739–786.
(
[
[
1
(
[
[
[
27] J.M. Campelo, F. Lafont, J.M. Marinas, Zeolites 15 (1995) 97–103.
28] S. Narayanan, K. Deshpande, Appl. Catal. A 199 (2000) 1–3.
29] S. Li, A. Zheng, Y. Su, H. Zhang, L. Chen, J. Yang, C. Ye, F. Deng, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
129 (2007) 11161–11171.
4
. Conclusion
Different degree of isomorphous substitution of Al3+ in the
[
30] S. Telalovi c´ , J.F. Ng, R. Maheswari, A. Ramanathan, G.K. Chuah, U. Hanefeld,
stannosilicate framework with MFI topology was achieved by
hydrothermal crystallization. These catalysts were synthesized by
hydrothermal crystallization of gels having molar compositions
SiO :xSnO :yAl O :0.23 (TPA) O:35H O, where x ranges from 0 to
Chem. Commun. (2008) 4631–4633.
[
31] R. Savidha, A. Pandurangan, M. Palaichamy, V. Murugesan, Catal. Lett. 91 (2003)
49–61.
[32] V. Parvulescu, C. Anastasescu, B.L. Su, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 211 (2004)
43–148.
33] V. Parvulescu, C. Anastasescu, C. Constantin, B.L. Su, Catal. Today 78 (2003)
77–485;
V. Parvulescu, Cr. Tablet, C. Anastasescu, B.L. Su, Catal. Today 93–95 (2004)
07–313.
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
2
1
00 and y from 0 to 400. Although, Sn:Al ratio was varied (ca. 1:0,
:0.33, 1:1, 1:3, 0:1), the overall molar Si/(Al + Sn) ratio was kept
[
4
constant as 50. It was evident from the TPAD results that, the frame-
work tin species create the weak acid sites whereas insertion of Al
lead to the creation of both the weaker as well as relatively stronger
acid sites. With an increase in Al3 insertion in Sn-MFI molecular
sieves, there is an increase in the Brønsted/Lewis acidity ratio as
well as the total acidity. Based on Brønsted/Lewis acidity ratio, the
Al-Sn-MFI samples followed the trend as M75 < M50 < M25. These
samples showed higher aniline conversion than the samples con-
taining either Al or Sn alone. Interestingly, an increase in stronger
acid sites with an increase in framework Al3 leads to decrease in
aniline conversion. Thus, synergy between Brønsted and Lewis acid
sites in Al-Sn-MFI catalysts was demonstrated to exist in aniline
N-methylation reaction. Upon process parameter optimization, Al-
Sn-MFI with Si/Al = 50.2, Si/Sn = 93.8, Si/(Al + Sn) = 43.2 showed the
maximum aniline conversion (67%) and NMA selectivity (81%) at
3
[
[
34] V. Parvulescu, C. Constantin, B.L. Su, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 202 (2003) 171–178.
35] R. Savidha, A. Pandurangan, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 276 (2004) 39–50.
+
[36] S. Vetrivel, A. Pandurangan, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 217 (2004) 165–174.
[
37] M. Selvaraj, B.R. Min, Y.G. Shul, T.G. Lee, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 74
2004) 143–155.
38] V. Parvulescu, B.L. Su, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 143 (2000) 575–584.
(
[
[39] V. Parvulescu, C. Anastasescu, B.L. Su, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 198 (2003)
49–261.
2
[
[
40] S. Narayanan, K. Deshpande, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 104 (1995) 109–113.
41] B. Rakshe, V. Ramaswamy, A.V. Ramaswamy, J. Catal. 188 (1999) 252–260.
+
[42] P.S. Niphadkar, P.N. Joshi, H.R. Gurav, S.S. Deshpande, V.V. Bokade, Catal. Lett.
33 (2009) 175–184.
1
[
43] K. Chaudhari, T.K. Das, P.R. Rajmohanan, K. Lazar, S. Sivasanker, A.J. Chandwad-
kar, J. Catal. 183 (1999) 281–291.
[44] P.S. Niphadkar, A.C. Garade, R.K. Jha, C.V. Rode, P.N. Joshi, Microporous Meso-
porous Mater. 136 (2010) 115–125.
[
45] P.S. Niphadkar, K.R. Patil, P.N. Joshi, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. (2010),
doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.10.36.
◦
−1
reaction temperature = 220 C, WHSV = 3 h , molar ratio (aniline to
methanol) = 1:8 and TOS = 4 h. On account of higher Brønsted/Lewis
acidity ratio, M25 (1.27) was found to be less stable as compared to
[
46] S. Narayanan, V. Durga Kumari, A. Sudhakar Rao, Appl. Catal. 111 (1994)
133–142.