of His-2a took place via the haem binding by ligation with His
residues. In contrast, a-helicity of His-1a was little affected by
the addition of haem at any percentage volume of TFE (0–90%),
indicating that His-1a could not bind the haem in this
concentration.
formation of a hydrophobic pocket are important for the haem
binding. That is, at the lower TFE content ( < 10%), the
hydrophobic pocket is not formed, because the conformation of
His-2a is predominantly a random-coil. On the other hand, at
the higher TFE content ( > 30%), the 2a-helix structure is
destroyed so that each a-helix segment is free to move. Because
there is no hydrophobic pocket at either lower or higher TFE
content, the peptide cannot bind the haem effectively. The
monomer peptide His-1a and 1-methylimidazole needed a
Titration of the haem with His-2a was also carried out in the
buffer containing various amounts of TFE. At 15% TFE, the
Soret band at 401 nm increased and the band at around 355 nm
decreased upon the addition of His-2a [Fig. 4(a)]. That is, an
UV–VIS spectrum of the haem was converted from the high
spin to the low spin form with an isosbestic point at 390 nm. The
decrease in absorbance at 355 nm indicated that the peptide
2
3
23
concentration of an order of ca. 10 mol dm for the haem
binding and did not show such a TFE dependence. These results
also confirm that the formation of the 2a-helix structure is
essential for the haem binding.
6
acted to break up haem aggregates. The binding constant for
the haem with His-2a was strongly dependent on the TFE
Next, demethylation catalysis of the haem bound to His-2a
1
1
content [Fig. 4(b)]. His-2a showed the highest binding constant
was demonstrated using N,N-dimethylaniline as a substrate.
5
3
21
at 15% TFE (K
a
= 5.8 3 10 dm mol ). In contrast, His-2a
As shown in Fig. 5, the initial rate v of the reaction in the
2
5
23
21
could not bind the haem effectively at < 10% and > 30% TFE
presence of His-2a (v = 16 3 10 mol dm min ) was
4
3
21
(K
a
< 3.0 3 10 dm mol ). These TFE titrations revealed that
accelerated by a factor of 8.0, relative to that in the absence of
2
5
23
21
the 2a-helix structure annealed by TFE and the consequent
the peptide (v = 2.0 3 10
mol dm
min ). The
acceleration of the reaction was dependent on the TFE content
and showed a maximum value at 15% TFE. The N-demethylase
activity was comparable to that of bilayer-bound cytochrome c
as reported by Hamachi et al.11 The initial rate was dependent
(
a) 1.0
0.6
0.4
[
Peptide] / [Haem]
2.71
2.17
1.62
1.36
1.08
0.81
0.54
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
2 2
on the concentration of H O , but not on that of N,N-
0.2
K
5
=
dimethylaniline. Therefore, the rate-determining step is the
reaction between the haem and H O . The peptide seems to
a
.8 × 10 mol–1 dm3
5
2
2
0.0
0
10
20
30
enhance the activity by isolating the haem in the peptide
structure from the haem aggregates in solution.
Peptide] / 10–6 mol dm
–3
[
0.27
.00
0
In conclusion, the haem binding of the His-peptide was
controlled by the peptide conformation with TFE. The catalytic
activity was enhanced by the formation of the haem–peptide
complex, which might be another kind of catalytic molten
× 3
0.0
12
globule. The strategy using designed peptides conjugated with
300
400
500
λ / nm
600
700
functional groups, such as haem, is expected to be applied to the
elucidation of the roles of polypeptide 3D structure on the
diverse functions of natural proteins, and the obtained informa-
tion will be useful for the design artificial proteins.
(b)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Footnotes
*
†
E-mail: hmihara@bio.titech.ac.jp
Leu-2a, a non-His peptide, had 55% helicity in the buffer.
K
0
10
20
30
40
50
TFE (%)
References
Fig. 4 (a) UV–VIS spectra of the haem with increasing His-2a
concentration in the buffer containing 15% TFE at 25 °C. [haem] = 1.0 3
1 The Porphyrins, ed. D. Dolphin, Academic, New York, 1979, vol. 7.
2 T. L. Poulos, Adv. Inorg. Biochem., 1988, 7, 2.
3 F. Rabanal, W. F. DeGrado and P. L. Dutton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996,
118, 473.
2
5
23
10
mol dm . (b) Effect of TFE content on the binding constant for His-
2a with the haem.
4
5
T. Sasaki and E. T. Kaiser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 380.
H. Mihara, Y. Haruta, S. Sakamoto, N. Nishino and H. Aoyagi, Chem.
Lett., 1996, 1; H. Mihara, K. Tomizaki, T. Fujimoto, S. Sakamoto,
H. Aoyagi and N. Nishino, Chem. Lett., 1996, 187.
Me
H
N
N
Haem
aggregates
Me
Me
+
H2O2
+ HCHO
6
D. R. Benson, B. R. Hart, X. Zhu and M. B. Doughty, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1995, 117, 8502.
n
5
4
3
2
1
00
00
00
00
00
0
+
His-2α
Haem + His-2α
7 S. Sakamoto, H. Aoyagi, N. Nakashima and H. Mihara, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 1996, 2319.
ν = 16 × 10 mol dm–3 min–1
–
5
(8.0)
8
N. E. Zhou, C. M. Kay and R. S. Hodges, J. Biol. Chem., 1992, 267,
664.
J. M. Scholtz, H. Qian, E. J. York, J. M. Stewart and R. L. Baldwin,
2
9
Haem only
Biopolymers, 1991, 31, 1463.
ν = 2.0 × 10 mol dm–3 min–1
–5
1
0 T. Kuwaraba, A. Nakamura, A. Ueno and F. Toda, J. Phys. Chem., 1994,
8, 6297.
11 I. Hamachi, A. Fujita and T. Kunitake, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
811.
(1.0)
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
8
t / min
1
2 W. F. DeGrado, Nature, 1993, 365, 488; K. Johnsson, R. K. Allemann,
H. Widmer and S. A. Benner, Nature, 1993, 365, 530; H. Mihara,
K. Tomizaki, N. Nishino and T. Fujimoto, Chem. Lett., 1993, 1533;
K. Broo, L. Brive, A.-C. Lundh, P. Ahlberg and L. Baltzer, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1996, 118, 8172.
Fig. 5 Time course of formaldehyde formation catalysed by the haem (2)
in the presence and (5) absence of His-2a. The reaction was initiated by
23
23
addition of hydrogen peroxide (4.9 3 10 mol dm ) to mixtures of N,N-
23
23
26
23
dimethylaniline (5.0 3 10 mol dm ), haem (4.8 3 10 mol dm ) and
25
23
23
His-2a (1.0 3 10 mol dm ) in 0.1 mol dm Tris HCl buffer (pH 7.4)
containing 15% TFE at 30 °C. About 80% of the haem was bound to the
peptide under the conditions according to the binding constant.
Received in Cambridge, UK, 17th March 1997; Com.
7/01852E
1222
Chem. Commun., 1997