RSC Advances
Paper
4 (a) K. M. Y. Yu, I. Curcic, J. Gabriel and S. C. Edman Tsang,
ChemSusChem, 2008, 1, 893–899; (b) J. Ma, N. N. Sun,
X. L. Zhang, N. Zhao, F. K. Xiao, W. Wei and Y. H. Sun,
Catal. Today, 2009, 148, 221–231; (c) W. Wang, S. P. Wang,
X. B. Ma and J. L. Gong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3703–3727.
5 (a) G. Pagani, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 1982, 61, 87–91;
(b) S. Walendy, G. Francio, M. Hoelscher and W. Leitner, Exp.
Green Sustainable Chem., 2009, 275–277; (c) S. G. Liang,
H. Z. Liu, T. Jiang, J. L. Song, G. Y. Yang and B. X. Han,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 2131–2133; (d) M. Peters,
Conclusions
Au NPs with uniform mean sizes (ꢀ3 nm) loaded onto various
supports were successfully prepared. These supported Au cata-
lysts were studied in detail to clarify the support and Au particle
size effects in the direct methylation reaction of N-methylani-
line with CO2/H2. Of the supports tested, Al2O3 with relatively
strong acidic and basic surface sites showed the best catalytic
performance. Other supports, such as SiO2 with few acidic sites,
Mn2O3 and ZnO with weak acid–base properties, Co3O4 and C
with neither acidic site nor basic site and MgO with relatively
strong basic sites, have little or low catalytic activity. There is
moderate catalytic activity when Au/TiO2 and Au/CeO2 with
a few acidic sites are used. Supports with relatively strong acid–
base bifunctional sites may be necessary for high efficient
methylation of N-methylaniline with CO2/H2.
By changing preparation parameters during the DPU
process, we obtained the Al2O3 supported Au NPs with
controlled mean sizes in the range of 1.8 to 8.3 nm. We proved
that, during the DPU process, aging time, aging temperature
and mole ratio of gold to urea were the main preparation
parameters affecting the mean size of Au NPs supported on
Al2O3.
¨
B. Kohler, W. Kuckshinrichs, W. Leitner, P. Markewitz and
¨
T. Muller, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4, 1216–1240.
6 (a) S. N. Riduan, Y. Zhang and J. Y. Ying, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2009, 48, 3322–3325; (b) A. E. Ashley, A. L. Thompson
and D. OHare, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9839–9843;
(c) S. Wesselbaum, T. vom Stein, J. Klankermayer and
W. Leitner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 7499–7502.
7 K. Motokura, D. Kashiwame, A. Miyaji and T. Baba, Org. Lett.,
2012, 14, 2642–2645.
8 Q. Su, J. Sun, J. Q. Wang, Z. F. Yang, W. Q. Cheng and
S. J. Zhang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 1556–1562.
9 Y. Yoshida, Y. Arai, S. Kado, K. Kunimori and K. Tomishige,
Catal. Today, 2006, 115, 95–101.
10 L. Schmid, A. Canonica and A. Baiker, Appl. Catal., A, 2003,
255, 23–33.
11 T. G. Ostapowicz, M. Schmitz, M. Krystof, J. Klankermayer
and W. Leitner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 12119–
12123.
12 (a) A. Ricci, Modern Amination Methods, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2000; (b) R. N. Salvatore, C. H. Yoon and
K. W. Jung, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 7785; (c) Z. Rapport, The
Chemistry of Anilines, Wiley Interscience, 2007.
The TOF values for direct methylation of N-methylaniline
with CO2/H2 increased with decreasing the mean size of Au NPs
from 8.3 to 1.8 nm and XAFS results demonstrated that only
reduced gold NPs supported on alumina were responsible for
high catalytic activity of Au/Al2O3 catalyst. The results suggested
that the Au-catalyzed direct methylation of N-methylaniline
with CO2/H2 was a structure-sensitive reaction. Then, we
proposed that N-methylformanilide could be a key intermediate
during methylation of N-methylaniline with CO2/H2.
13 (a) M. F. Ali, B. M. ElAli and J. G. Speight, Handbook of
Industrial Chemistry-Organic Chemicals, McGraw-Hill, New
York, 2005; (b) H.-J. Arpe and S. Hawkins, Industrial
Organic Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997; (c)
A. Dhakshinamoorthy, M. Alvaro and H. Garcia, Appl.
Catal., A, 2010, 378, 19–25.
Acknowledgements
This work was nancially supported by the Program of Inter-
national S&T Cooperation (Grant no. 2014DFG60230), the
National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB933104), the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21303246,
11275258, 91127001).
14 (a) X. Jiang, C. Wang, Y. W. Wei, D. Xue, Z. T. Liu and
J. L. Xiao, Chem. - Eur. J., 2014, 20, 58–63; (b) S. Savourey,
`
G. Lefere, J. C. Berthet and T. Cantat, Chem. Commun.,
2014, 50, 14033–14036; (c) I. Sorribes, K. Junge and
M. Beller, Chem. - Eur. J., 2014, 20, 7878–7883.
Notes and references
1 J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins and J. J. Ephraums, Climate 15 (a) O. Jacquet, X. Frogneux, C. D. N. Gomes and T. Cantat,
Change: The IPCC Scientic Assessment, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990.
Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 2127–2131; (b) Y. Li, X. Fang, K. Junge
and M. Beller, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 9568–9571.
2 H. Arakawa, M. Aresta, J. N. Armor, M. A. Barteau, 16 (a) K. Beydoun, T. vom Stein, J. Klankermayer and
E. J. Beckman, A. T. Bell, J. E. Bercaw, C. Creutz, E. Dinjus,
D. A. Dixon, K. Domen, D. L. DuBois, J. Eckert, E. Fujita,
D. H. Gibson, W. A. Goddard, D. W. Goodman, J. Keller,
W. Leitner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 9554–9557; (b)
Y. Li, I. Sorribes, T. Yan, K. Junge and M. Beller, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 12156–12160.
G. J. Kubas, H. H. Kung, J. E. Lyons, L. E. Manzer, 17 (a) S. Das, F. D. Bobbink, G. Laurenczy and P. J. Dyson,
T. J. Marks, K. Morokuma, K. M. Nicholas, R. Periana,
L. Que, J. R. Nielson, W. M. H. Sachtler, L. D. Schmidt,
A. Sen, G. A. Somorjai, P. C. Stair, B. R. Stults and
W. Tumas, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 953–996.
3 T. Sakakura, J. C. Choi and H. Yasuda, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
2365–2387.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 12876–12879; (b)
E. Blondiaux, J. Pouessel and T. Cantat, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2014, 53, 12186–12190.
18 X. J. Cui, X. Dai, Y. Zhang, Y. Deng and F. Shi, Chem. Sci.,
2014, 5, 649–655.
99686 | RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 99678–99687
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015