Tetrahedron Letters
3
at the final compound . The compound 19 was purified by
acidic resin and immediately converted to the final product
using the Mitsunobu’s approach by intramolecular
cyclization of secondary amine and primary hydroxyl.19 The
reaction was carried out with triphenyl phosphine and DIED
at 0 °C for 3h and the required product (+)-1-deoxy-6-epi-
castanospermine (5) was isolated as a thick oil with 43%
yield from crude 18 (Scheme 3). The spectral data of the
isolated product 5 was comparable with the literature
22
value,20 [α]D = +22.5° (c 0.05, MeOH), lit8 [α]D = +23°
(MeOH) and enantiomer of 5 lit10 [α]D = -25.2° (c 0.25,
MeOH).
23
Figure2. NOE effect of indolizidine 5
In conclusion, a new synthetic stereoselective approach for
the construction of polyhydroxylated indolizidine, 1-deoxy-
6-epi-castanospermine have been developed from readily
accessible starting materials in moderate to good yields. The
azabicyclic imino sugar synthesis involves many in situ
conversion includes Sharpless dihydroxylation, Grignard
reaction and asymmetric imine reduction. This synthetic
approach can be useful to synthesize other polyhydroxy
alkaloid analogues.
O
O
N
O
a
N
N
Cbz
Cbz
OBn
O
O
13
14
O
OH
c
b
N
Cbz
OBn
OH
O
15
Acknowledgments
OH
OH OH
H
N
HO
OH
d
The authors would like to thank Dr. Vilas Dahanukar and
Dr. H. Ramamohan of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories for useful
discussions. We also thank the analytical department, Dr.
Reddy’s Laboratories, for providing the analytical support.
Cbz
OBn
OBn
OH
O
N
16
17
OH
OH
HO
OH
Note: DRL-IPD communication No.: IPDO IPM-00493
HO
OH
e
OH
OH
N
H
References and notes
N
18
19
1.
2.
(a) Hohenschutz, L. D.; Bell, E. A.; Jewess, P. J.; Leworthy, D. P.;
Pryce, R. J.; Arnold, E.; Clardy, J. Phytochemistry 1981, 4, 811.
(a) Saul, R.; Chambers, J. P.; Molyneux, R. J.; Elbein, A. D. Arch.
Biochem. Biophys. 1983, 221, 593. (b) Winchester, B. G.; Cenci di
Bello, I.; Richardson, A. C.; Nash, R. J.; Fellows, L. E.; Ramsden, N.
G.; Fleet, G. Biochem. J. 1990, 269, 227 (c) Scofield, A. M.; Rossiter,
J. T.; Witham, P.; Kite, G. C.; Nash, R. J.; Fellows, L. E.
Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 107.
OH
HO
OH
H
f
N
5
Scheme3. (a) (i) 1-((3-bromopropoxy)methyl)benzene, Mg,
Dry THF, (ii) Diethyl ether, 0 to 30 °C, 1h, 81%. (b) AD mix α,
Ke3Fe(CN)6, MeSO2NH2, K2CO3, NaHCO3, OsO4, t-BuOH-
Water, 0 °C, 18 h, 75%. (c) p-TSA, MeOH, RT, 16 h, (d) H2,
Pd(OH)2/C, methanol, RT, 8 h then 2N HCl, RT, 12 h, 75%
(two steps) (e) NaBH3CN, acetic acid, methanol, RT, 30 h (f)
PPh3, DIED, Pyridine 0 °C, 3 h, 43% (two steps).
3.
4.
Andrew H.; Norman C.; Donald M.; Arthur C.; J. Med. Chem. 1993,
36, 4082.
(a) Karples, A.; Fleet, G. W. J.; Dwek, R. A.; Petursson, S.;
Namgoong, S. K.; Ramsden, N. G.; Jacob, G. S.; Rademacher, T. W.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 85, 9229. (b) Walker, B. D.;
Kowalski, M.; Goh, W. C.; Kozarsky, K.; Krieger, M.; Rosen, C.;
Rohrschneider, L.; Haseltine, W. A.; Sodroski, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
1987, 84, 8120. (c) Durantel, D. Curr. Opin. InVestig. Drugs 2009, 10,
860. (d) Tanaka, Y.; Kato, J.; Kohara, M.; Galinski, M. Antiviral Res.
2006, 72, 1. (e) Whitby, K.; Taylor, D.; Patel, D.; Ahmed, P.; Tyms, A.
Antivir Chem. Chemother. 2004, 15, 141.
(a) Humphries, M. J.; Matsumoto, K.; White, S. L. Cancer Res. 1986,
46, 5215. (b) Sanchez-Fernandez, E. M.; Risques-Cuadro, R.;
Chasseraud, M.; Ahidouch, A.; Ortiz-Mellet, C.; Quadid-Ahidouch, H.;
Garcia, F. J. M. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5328.
Truscheit, E.; Frommer, W.; Junge, B.; Muller, L.; Schmidt, D. D.;
Wingender, W. Angew.Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1981, 20, 744.
Winchester, B. G.; Cenci di Bello, I.; Richardson, A. C.; Nash, R. J.;
Fellows, L. E.; Ramsden, N. G.; Fleet, G. Biochem. J. 1990, 269, 227.
K. H. Aamlid, L. Hough, A. C. Richardson, Carbohydr. Res. 1990,
202, 117.
The configuration and relative stereochemistry of the final
indolizidine structure 5 was further confirmed by APT,
HSQC, and COSY-NOESY tool. The strong NOE effect
between H8a and H7, H8a and H1β indicate H7 and H8a are
same side of the plane. Also NOE between H7 and H6
specify H6 and H7 are on the same side of the ring.
Irradiation to H8a didn’t enhance the intensity of H8, this
indicate H8 and H8a both are on the opposite side of the rin.
The trans diaxial relation between H7 and H8 are revealed
by the coupling constant J7,8 value (9.3 Hz) while the small
value of J6,7 (3.4 Hz) suggested the cis axial-equatorial
orientation. (Figure2).
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Meyers, A. I.; Andres, C. J.; Resek, J. E.; Woodall, C. C.; McLaughlin,
M. A.; Lee, P. H.; Price, D. A.; Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8931.
10. Yun, H.; Kim, J. J.; Lee,S. S.; Han,Y. T.; Chang, D. J.; Kim, D. D.;
Suh,Y. G. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 5389.
11. Angeliki, T. S.; Efthymia, G. Y.; John, K. G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013,
939.
12. (a) Takashima, O.; Matsumoto, Y.; Kiyonori, K.; Takeshi, I.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 47, 4617. (b) Ruowen, W.; Guizhi, Z.; Lei, M.;