Electrochemical Promotion of the Pt/Propene + NO Reaction
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 101, No. 19, 1997 3767
5
of Na increased. There is persuasive evidence that this step
be detected after withdrawal of a poisoned catalyst from the
NO + propene mixture. In this case, the nitrate was reacted
away before XP analysis was possible. With the promoted
sample, on which both compounds are present in much smaller
amounts, neither is detectable after transfer from the reaction
mixture. The Na 1s results (Figure 7b) confirm that the
poisoned surface is more heavily loaded with Na compounds
than the promoted surface; however, the effect is more apparent
in the Na KLL Auger spectra shown in Figure 7c. This reflects
the very different sampling depth in the two cases (electron
kinetic energies ∼180 and ∼990 eV, respectively). The
conclusion is that in the poisoned case the Na compounds are
present as very substantial 3D crystallitessthis “bulk” material,
which presumably covers most of the Pt surface, would
contribute significantly to the total intensity of the KLL Auger
spectrum but would contribute to the Na 1s intensity far less.
The C 1s spectra (Figure 7d) show relatively little carbon
retention on the poisoned surface, presumably due to extensive
coverage by sodium nitrite/sodium nitrate. The electrochemi-
cally cleaned surface accumulated some graphitic carbon, and
on the promoted surface the 286.2 eV BE emission indicates
change is associated with a surface phase transitionsthe
formation or disruption of islands of CO. Although CO has
been detected as a surface intermediate in the Pt-catalyzed
oxidation of ethylene,13 one may speculate that the absence of
a step change in the present case is not unexpected, given the
greater chemical complexity of the adsorbed phase. It is
possible that the systematically increasing Ea values are at least
partly associated with Na-induced increase in chemisorption
strength of the three electron-withdrawing adsorbates (Na, Oa,
NOa), though the complexity of the system precludes detailed
analysis. The increase in Eas is accompanied by large increases
in the preexponential factors (thus giving the net rate accelera-
tion) which may plausibly be associated at least in part with an
increased density of sites for NO dissociation due to the presence
of Na.
The strong poisoning behavior observed at high Na loadings
is understandable in terms of the XPS results (see below) which
indicate the presence of large amounts of Na compounds at very
negative catalyst potentials. In other words, coverage of active
Pt sites by overloading with promoter is a likely major cause
of poisoning. Additionally, as noted above, the chemisorption
bonds of propene and oxygen should be respectively weakened
and strengthened by an electropositive promoter. Therefore,
at high levels of Na the coverage of propene should be markedly
attenuated, while the activation energy for reactions involving
Oa could be increased.
2
1a
the presence of CHx species spresumably resulting from
dissociation and partial oxidation of propene on the promoter-
activated surface. Figure 7e shows that the poisoned surface
exhibits O 1s emission at 531 and 535 eV BE. The latter is
21b
due to the nitrate species; the associated emission is quenched
by standing in ambient vacuum for 10 h, in line with the
behavior of the corresponding N 1s emission (Figure 7a). The
origin of the 531 eV BE signal is less clearsgiven the state of
the surface and the sample handling procedures, it is unlikely
to be due to Oa on Pt. It could possibly be due to oxidic oxygen
associated with Na, although on the basis of the present results
we cannot be sure about this. As noted in the Results section,
Figures 8a,b nicely shows the different thermal stabilities and
reducibilities of the nitrate and nitrite species. These are in
accord with the corresponding properties of the bulk materials
and the detectable redispersion of the nitrite at 520 K suggest
that the nitrite phase might be very mobile at reaction temper-
ature. The O 1s results in Figure 8c confirm that the nitrite
and nitrate are reduced by propene. The 532 eV peak
corresponds to that also observed in the postreaction experiments
The central assumption underlying all of the preceding
discussion is that, under EP conditions, reversible changes in
VWR correspond to the reversible pumping of Na to/from the Pt
from/to the solid electrolyte. Our XPS data (Figure 6a) clearly
demonstrate that such reversible transport of Na between â′′-
alumina and the gas-exposed surface of the Pt film does indeed
occur under the conditions of voltage and temperature that were
used for the reactor studies. This is an important observation
that substantiates our view of the mode of action of the EP
system. Additionally, the identical electrotransport properties
and electron binding energies exhibited by vacuum deposited
Na and by electropumped Na in vacuum clearly establish that
these are the same chemical species. This is an important point
and should help to clarify apparent misunderstandings that
sometimes arise about the chemical nature of alkali promoters
on metal catalyst surfaces. The mode of delivery of pure Na
to the Pt surface is irrelevant: in vacuum it is present as an
(Figure 7e), tentatively assigned above to “oxidic” oxygen;
clearly, it is much more resistant to reduction than the nitrate
and nitrite. The 533 eV BE shoulder observed in spectrum 4
after the largest dose of propene could be assigned to carbonate;
some support for this suggestion comes from the recent
observation that COa is observed as a surface intermediate during
the oxidation of ethylene on Na-promoted Pt{111}.
adatom that has undergone significant charge transfer to the
δ-
(
in this case) Pt surface, Naδ+/Pt . The presence of a reactive
gas atmosphere converts this Na into surface compound(s)
whose composition and degree of dispersion depend on the
temperature and the composition of the gas phase, as discussed
below. We have found that these surface compounds can also
be electrochemically destroyed by pumping Na away from the
Pt film.
Finally, we draw attention to an interesting question. The
observation that the surface nitrate is efficiently reduced by
-
-
propene raises the possibility that NO3 /NO2 may constitute
a redox couple that is involved in the catalytic turnover, thus
The XPS results reveal the identity of the principal surface
chemical compounds formed during Na electropumping in the
reaction gas. It seems clear that both NaNO2 and NaNO3 are
formed, and we accordingly identify nitrite and nitrate as the
main counterions which, with Na, constitute the promoter phase.
This identification depends on the observed N 1s binding
energies and the relative tendencies toward wetting and decom-
position exhibited by the two nitroxy compounds: the nitrate
is more thermally stable than the nitrite (Figure 8A). The
assignment is strengthened by the observed differences in
reactivity towards propene: the nitrate is more chemically
reactive than the nitrite (Figure 8B). This is also consistent
with the observation (Figure 7A) that only nitrite survives to
hydrocarbon + nitrate > oxidation product + nitrite
nitrite + O (from NO dissociation) > nitrate
a
If this were the case, it would mean that we are dealing with a
promoter system in which the cation triggers the primary
chemistry while the anion facilitates subsequent oxidative
reactions. Further work is in progress to investigate this
possibility.
Conclusions
1. The catalytic reduction of NO over Pt by propene exhibits
strong electrochemical promotion when Na from â′′-alumina