RULE OF FIVE CYCLIZATIONS
87
ethyl vinyl ether and mercuric acetate (0.51 g, 1.6 mmol).
The bromo-vinyl ether product (1.94 g, 11.8 mmol, 75%
yield) distilled at 60–80 8C at 28 torr. H NMR: 6.45 (1 H,
equation (the integrated rate equation was essentially
taken from ref. 10 after correcting for the typographical
error that omitted the minus sign).
1
dd, J ¼ 14.3, 6.9 Hz), 4.19 (1 H, dd, J ¼ 14.3, 2.2 Hz), 4.01
k þ k
k þ k þ k ½Bu SnHꢄ
1
2
1
2
3
3
I
(
(
1 H, dd, J ¼ 6.8, 2.2 Hz), 3.81 (2 H, t, J ¼ 5.9 Hz), 3.50
2 H, t, J ¼ 6.5 Hz), 2.18 (2 H, quintet, J ¼ 6.2 Hz).
½
12ꢄ ¼ ½Bu SnHꢄ ꢂ
ln
F
3
I
k
k þ k
3
1
2
1
3
C NMR: 151.6, 86.8, 65.2, 32.1, 30.0. GC–MS: 164
Mþ), 166 (M þ 2).
where [12] is the final concentration and [Bu SnH] is
F 3 I
(
the initial concentration. This analysis allowed determi-
nation of the values of k /k and k /k or k /k by using the
substituted equation:
1
2
1
3
2 3
1
-Bromo-5-methyl-4-oxa-5-hexene (6b). 3-Bromo-
1
5
1
-propanol (2.52 g, 18 mmol) was allowed to react with
0 ml of 2-methoxypropene and mercuric acetate (0.60 g,
.8 mmol). The bromo-vinyl ether product (0.86 g,
.8 mmol, 27% yield) distilled at 70–80 8C at 30 torr.
1
þ ½Bu SnHꢄ
3
I
½
12ꢄ ¼ ½Bu SnHꢄ ꢂ xðr þ 1Þ ln
F
3
I
xðr þ 1Þ
4
where x ¼ k /k and r ¼ k /k ¼ [7]/[8]. For an exper-
2
3
1 2
1
H NMR: 3.84 (2 H, brs), 3.77 (2 H, t, J ¼ 5.8 Hz), 3.51
imentally determined value of r, x was varied until the
value for [12] calculated matched the value of [12]
observed.
(
(
2 H, t, J ¼ 6.5 Hz), 2.2 (2 H, quintet, J ¼ 6.2 Hz), 1.8
F
F
13
3 H, s). C: NMR: 159.5, 81.4, 64.5, 32.1, 30.1, 20.8.
GC–MS: 178 (Mþ), 180 (M þ 2).
Acknowledgements
1
-Bromo-3-methyl-4-oxa-5-hexene (6c). 1-Bromo-
3
6
3
-butanol (4.83 g, 31.6 mmol) was allowed to react with
0 ml of ethyl vinyl ether and mercuric acetate (1.2 g,
.8 mmol). The bromo-vinyl ether product (1.53 g,
.6 mmol, 27% yield) distilled at 65–75 8C at 30 torr.
We thank M. A. Mehta for helpful discussions. We
acknowledge is made to the donors of the Petroleum
Research Fund (grant 20612-B4), administered by the
American Chemical Society, and Oberlin College for
financial support.
8
1
H NMR: 6.63 (1 H, dd, J ¼ 14.2, 6.6 Hz), 4.28 (1 H, dd,
J ¼ 14.2, 1.2 Hz), 4.07 (1 H, m), 4.0 (1 H, dd, J ¼ 6.6,
1
.6 Hz), 3.45 (2 H, t, J ¼ 6.1 Hz), 2.0 (2 H, m), 1.2 (3 H, d,
REFERENCES
13
J ¼ 6.2 Hz). C NMR: 150.7, 88.6, 73.4, 39.5, 29.7, 19.6.
GC–MS: 178 (Mþ), 180 (M þ 2).
1. Schuster DI. In CRC Handbook of Organic Photochemistry and
Photobiology, (2nd edn), Horspool W, Lenci F (eds). CRC Press:
USA 2004.
KINETICS AND PRODUCT STUDIES
2
. Newcomb M, Choi S, Horner JH. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 61:
225–1231.
. Crimmins MT. Chem. Rev. 1988; 88: 1453–1473.
1
3
The kinetics studies were modeled after the studies by
8,10
4. Della EW, Kostakos C, Smith PA. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 363–365.
. Wolff S, Agosta WC. J. Org. Chem. 1980; 45: 3139–3141.
6. Matlin AR, Lectka TC, McGarvey DJ, Jacob P, Picken HA.
Butler and Walling.
vinyl ethers 6 (80–350 mM), tri-n-butyl tin hydride
30–100 mM), AIBN (0.6–3.2 mM), and an internal
Decalin solutions of the bromo-
5
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987; 28: 5083–5086.
. Wolff S, Agosta WC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983; 105: 1299–1304.
. Walling C, Cioffari A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972; 94: 6059–6064.
(
7
8
standard (octane) were prepared and sealed in Pyrex
tubes, following degassing by three freeze-pump-thaw
cycles. The ratio of bromo-vinyl ether to tin hydride was
9. Lamb RC, Ayers PW, Toney MK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963; 85:
483–3486.
3
1
1
0. Smith TW, Butler GB. J. Org. Chem. 1978; 43: 6–13.
1. However radicals with electron withdrawing substituents on the
radical center in 9 undergo reversible cyclization. See: Julia M,
Acc. Chem. Res. 1971; 4: 386–392.
ꢀ
3:1 in each sample. Three concentrations were
examined at each temperature studied and duplicate
tubes of each concentration were prepared. The samples
were heated at the desired temperatures until the reactions
consumed all of the hydride and then analyzed by
capillary GC. Each tube was analyzed at least twice and
the results were averaged. Products were identified by
comparison to authentic samples and GC–MS. The
combined chemical yields (GC) of products 7, 8, and 12
1
2. Houk KN, Paddon-Row MN, Spellmeyer DC, Rondan N, Nagase
S. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 2874–2879.
13. Spellmeyer DC, Houk KN. J. Org. Chem. 1987; 52: 959–973.
1
4. Beckwith ALJ, Schiesser CH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985; 26:
73–376.
5. Geise B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1983; 22: 753–764.
3
1
16. However, it should be noted that bimolecular additions of radicals
to substituted alkenes occurs at the less substituted end of the
alkene independent of the electronic nature of the substituent on
the alkene. See: Tedder JM, Walton JC, Tetrahedron 1980; 36:
701–707.
(
based on the initial hydride concentration), where
8
9
4–91% for radical 9a, 80–90% for radical 9b, and
5–100% for radical 9c. Response factors were deter-
1
7. Eliel EL, Allinger NL, Angyal SJ, Morrison GA. Conformational
Analysis. Wiley: New York, 1965; 191–192.
8. Beckwith ALJ, Lawrence T, Serelis AK. Chem. Commun. 1980:
11: 484–485.
mined for all products with reference to the internal
standard. The data were fitted to the integrated rate
1
Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2007; 20: 83–87
DOI: 10.1002/poc