Reactions of Hypochlorous Acid with Chlorite Ion
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2000 2619
-
-
8
Table 2. Determination of ClO
3
by CZE from the HOCl/ClO
2
results disagree with the previous explanation for the formation
a
Reaction in 0.02 M [HOAc]
T
-
of ClO3 from the reaction of Cl2O2 with HOCl (eq 5).
Structures of the Proposed Intermediates. To help under-
p[H+] [HOCl]
, mM % ClO
% ClO
-
∑(% ClO
+ % ClO
-)
3
T
2
3
2
stand if the proposed intermediates in Schemes 1 and 2 are
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
.22
.42
.26
.19
.15
.05
.98
.72
3.01
1.50
1.50
3.01
1.177
1.05
0.525
1.177
90
105
101
96
102
109
121
106
16 ( 1
11 ( 2
106
3
2,33
116
109
104
115
115
127
125
plausible, ab initio calculations were used.
Equilibrium
7.6 ( 0.4
8 ( 2
geometries were determined from both B3LYP/6-31G* and
B3YLP/6-311++G(3df, 3pd) calculations. The latter results give
the molecular structures of the intermediates, bond distances,
and atomic charges shown in Figure 6. One proposed intermedi-
13 ( 2
6 ( 2
6 ( 1
3
4
19 ( 2
ate, Cl2O3, has been observed in the gas phase, and ClOCl-
O)O was calculated to be the most stable structure by Clark
(
a
ClO
2
-] ) 0.01 M; pressure injection 25 mbar, 10 s; separation
[
33
and Francisco. The relative energetics of the reaction pathways
are given in the Supporting Information. Aqueous solvation will
undoubtedly have a large effect on their relative stabilities and
reactivities. However, the calculated structures serve as useful
models for the proposed intermediates.
voltage -25 kV.
of ClO2 even though ClO3- is also formed. Scheme 2 shows
the proposed pathways to account for the effects of pH and
buffer on the observed yields. It must be emphasized that these
steps all occur after the rate-determining steps and are based
on logical explanations of how the yields are affected by changes
-
-
Comparison between the HOCl/ClO2 and HOBr/ClO2
1
4
-
Reactions. Previous studies showed that HOBr and ClO2
OH
in conditions. The k4 path accounts for the decreased yield
react by the same mechanism as given in Scheme 1 for the HOCl
of ClO2 as the pH increases, and the k5A path explains why
high acetate ion concentrations reduce the yield of ClO2.
At low pH and low buffer concentrations, the k4 and k5A
pathways are negligible. If the fraction of the ClOClO/ClO2-
reaction by the k9 path is x, then the fraction of this reaction by
-
and ClO2 reaction. The HOBr reactions are faster, where the
k1 step is a factor of 60 times larger than that for HOCl. The
OH
experimentally observed rate constants with acid-assisted con-
+
-
3
tributions from H3O and H2PO4 vary from 60 to 10 for
kobsd /kobsd
HOBr
HOCl
, depending on the pH and buffer concentra-
k8 path is (1 - x). The overall stoichiometry is described in eq
tions.
-
2
8. The yields of ClO2 and ClO3 in terms of HOCl are given
There are several reasons why we prefer to designate the
initial steady-state intermediates as chainlike structures, i.e.,
in eqs 29 and 30. When x ) 0.2, the predicted yield of ClO2 is
-
-
HOBrOClO and HOClOClO rather than Y-shaped structures
-
-
-
withhalogen-halogenbonds,i.e.,HOBrCl(O)O andHOClCl(O)O .
First, studies by Perrone and Margerum of HOCl reactions
with BrO2 require a chainlike adduct (HOClOBrO ) to account
for the formation of ClO2 as a product. Second, ab initio
calculations show the chainlike structure is preferred. Third,
(
1 - 2x)HOCl + 2ClO2
f
3
5
-
-
2
(1 - x)ClO + xClO3 + (1 - x)Cl (28)
-
-
2
1
- x
%
ClO )
× 100
× 100
(29)
(30)
36
2
1
- 2x
the proposed mechanism in Scheme 2 with Cl2O3 as an
ClO3-
)
x
intermediate is more favorable for ClOCl(O)O than for ClClO3.
33
%
1
- 2x
We cannot rule out the possibility of some competing paths
with halogen-halogen bonding for the intermediates, but we
suggest that the chainlike structures are preferred.
1
4
33%, which is close to the experimental result of 142% at pH
.7 and [HOAc]T ) 0.02 M in Figure 4. As the [HOAc]T is
Although the k1 step corresponds to the formation of an adduct
increased to 0.5 M (Figure 4), the yield of ClO2 drops to 105%.
-
between a Lewis base (OClO ) and a weak Lewis acid (HOCl
-
We suggest that the high OAc concentration causes this 37%
decrease in ClO2 yield, which would mean an 18.5% increase
-1 -1
or HOBr), the rate constants of 1.6 and 97 M
s
are much
smaller than those for most Lewis acid-base reactions. Once
again, ab initio calculations are helpful in understanding why
this is the case. The O-Cl (1.707 Å) bond length in HOCl
increases by 0.14 Å, and the O-Cl (1.576 Å) bond lengths in
-
in ClO3 formation. This would correspond (approximately) to
OAc
-
-
k5 /k3 ) (0.185/0.105)([ClO2 ]/[OAc ]) ) 0.06, which is
OH
5
reasonable compared to values of k4 /k3 ) 1.3 × 10 and
HPO
-
k5
4
/k3 ) 0.20, because OAc is a much weaker base. Much
higher concentrations of HOCl were used in the CZE experi-
ments. The ClO2 and ClO3 yields in Table 2 at low pH
correspond roughly to x ) 0.1 (113% ClO2 and 13% ClO3 ).
(
32) Molecular orbital calculations were performed using the Gaussian 94
program: Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M.
W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Keith, T.;
Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham,
M. A.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski,
J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.;
Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E. S.;
Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Binkley, J. S.; Defrees, D. J.;
Baker, J.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzales, C.; Pople, J. A.
Gaussian 94, Revision D.2; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
-
-
Greater than 100% yields of ClO2 were also observed in the
-
+
15
Cl2/ClO2 reaction ([H ] ) 0.2 M) and in the disproportion-
ation31 of ClO2 ([H ] ) 0.01-2 M). The disproportionation
-
+
-
of chlorous acid in the absence of Cl followed the same
stoichiometry as in eq 24, where the limiting step was proposed
to be the slow formation of HOCl (eq 31).2
8-30
We propose
(33) All equilibrium geometrical parameters were fully optimized, using
Schlegel’s method, to better than 0.001 Å for bond distances and 0.10°
for bond angles with a self-consistent field convergence of at least
slow
+
-
-
9
2HClO2
8 HOCl + H + ClO3
(31)
10 on the density matrix: Clark, J.; Francisco, J. S. J. Phys. Chem.
A 1997, 101, 7145-7153.
34) (a) Hayman, G. D.; Cox, R. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 155, 1-7. (b)
Burkholder, J. B.; Mauldin, R. L., III; Yokelson, R. J.; Solomon, S.;
Ravishankara, A. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 7597-7605. (c) Friedl,
R. R.; Birk, M.; Oh, J. J.; Cohen, E. A. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1995, 170,
(
that HOCl or Cl2 will react with ClO2- to form ClOClO (eqs 9
and 10), which again reacts with ClO2 to form an adduct,
ClOCl(O)OClO . At low pH, this adduct can generate more
HOCl, which leads to more ClO2 and ClO3 (Scheme 2). Our
-
-
3
83-396.
-
(
35) Perrone, T. F.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. To be submitted for
publication.
(31) Schmitz, G.; Rooze, H. Can. J. Chem. 1981, 59, 1177-1187.
(36) Guha, S.; Francisco, J. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. Submitted for publication.