catalysts. However, the typical polymer supports suffer from
serious limitations like insolubility, gel formation, tedious
procedures to swell the polymer, and limited loading of the
phosphorus ligand in the polymer backbone (e.g., 0.17 mmol/
5
b
g). Many of these issues relate to the fact that polymers
that are purchased commercially, or are prepared by con-
ventional radical polymerization of styrene, have high
molecular weight and/or broad molecular weight distribution.
Thus, they have poor solubility properties. The slower
kinetics of reactions catalyzed by gel-phase or solid-phase
catalysts have important practical effects as well. For
instance, the conjugate addition of arylboronic acids to
enones suffers from competing hydrolysis of the costly
boronic acids: the slower the catalyst is, the more hydrolysis
occurs. Thus, when a heterogeneous polystyrene-supported
catalyst is used for the conjugate addition, a 4-5-fold excess
5
of boronic acid is required. We hypothesized that problems
such as this could be solved by synthesis of soluble polymer-
supported rhodium catalysts that have a narrow molecular
weight distribution yet can be readily recycled by precipita-
tion and filtration. In addition to molecular weight control,
it was important to design a polymer support that could bind
Rh in a bidentate fashion. Such binding was expected to
better site-isolate the rhodium catalysts as well as prevent
leaching of rhodium from the polymer.
indicating that the polymer can support 0.32 mmol of
rhodium per gram of polymer.
11
The polymer-supported phosphite is quite soluble in
tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane, and toluene (e.g., 60 mg/
ml in toluene), but is insoluble in methanol. Thus, it is
recovered quantitatively by simple precipitation with MeOH
and filtration.
Next, we turned our attention to the examination of the
supported rhodium complexes in catalytic hydroarylations
of enones. The typical experimental procedure is straight-
forward and simple to operate. A mixture of enone (1 mmol)
and arylboronic acid (1.3 equiv) was placed in a round-
bottomed flask and a toluene solution (3 mL) containing
Ultimately, we have been able to synthesize a well-
characterized polymer having comparatively low molecular
weight and a narrow molecular weight distribution (∼1.2 ×
4
9
1
0 , PDI ) 1.3, Scheme 1). Control of the molecular weight
and distribution was achieved by adopting a living free
radical polymerization technique that is mediated by the
9
stable nitroxyl radical, TEMPO. Conducting the copolym-
erization of the functional monomer 1 and styrene (1:10 ratio)
at 123 °C produced a functional polymer whose ligand
incorporation into the polystyrene backbone was estimated
2
Rh(acac)(CO) and JanaPhos was added to it under an inert
1
at 10% from the H NMR spectrum. Interestingly, end group
atmosphere. Finally, a solution of methanol and water (1:1,
0.5 mL) was added to it via syringe and the resulting reaction
mixture was heated at 50 °C. As can be seen from Table 1,
enals, aliphatic enones, chalcones, and cyclic enones all give
1
analysis of the vinyl region of the H NMR spectrum suggests
that the polymer is not cross-linked under these conditions.
In other words, a single alkene in the bis-alkene 1 undergoes
polymerization. The resulting polymer was deprotected and
the phosphite ligands introduced onto the polymer backbone.
The result is a polymer-supported Biphephos derivative that
1
2
high yields of hydroarylation products with our ligand.
Importantly, these high yields are obtained when using just
.3 equiv of boronic acid partners; related reactions with
1
1
0
polymer-supported rhodium catalysts require 4-5-fold excess
we call JanaPhos. If incorporation of the phosphite into
the polymer was perfect, one would expect a P-loading of
5
of boronic acids. In fact, our recyclable catalyst performs
as well as, or better than, typical small-molecule catalysts
1
.10 mmol/g and thus the ligand loading would be 0.55
2
a,5
3
1
which typically utilize 1.3-10 equiv of boronic acid.
It is important to note that the MeOH/H O cosolvent used
mmol/g. Estimation of the P loading by P NMR spectros-
copy shows that the P-loading is 0.65 mmol/g. This value
was further confirmed by ICP-OES analysis of the polymer,
2
in the hydroarylations was not enough to cause precipitation
of the catalyst. In fact, the use of water as a cosolvent has a
marked positive effect on the reaction yield; in the absence
of protic cosolvent, the hydroarylation of cyclohexenone
proceeds to only 35% conversion after 15 h.
(
8) (a) Grubbs, R. H.; Kroll, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 3062.
(
b) Nozaki, K.; Itoi, Y.; Shibahara, F.; Shirakawa, E.; Ohta, T.; Takaya,
H.; Hiyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4051. (c) Nozaki, K.;
Shibahara, F.; Itoi, Y.; Shirakawa, E.; Ohta, T.; Takaya, H.; Hiyama, T.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1999, 72, 1911. (d) Shibahara, F.; Nozaki, K.; Hiyama,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8555.
(11) Recent reaction improvements have led to phosphorus loadings of
1.06 mmol/g; however, the experiments reported in this paper utilized
polymer with lower (0.65 mmol/g) phosporus loading.
(
9) Since our functional monomer proved to be equally active toward
polymerization as styrene, the PDI is expected to be similar to that reported
for pure polystyrene: Dollin, M.; Szkurhan, A. R.; Georges, M. K. J. Polym.
Sci., Part A 2007, 45, 5487.
(12) A control experiment wherein cyclohexenone was treated with
phenylboronic acid without added Rh(acac)(CO)
product under identical conditions.
2
and did not produce any
(
10) Cuny, G. D.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2066.
972
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 4, 2009