SIMILARITY AND KNOWLEDGE
61
±
(Eds.), Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses (pp. 203 230). Hills-
dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Medin, D.L., Goldstone, R.L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological
±
Review, 100, 254 278.
Medin, D.L., & SchaŒer, M.M. (1978). Context theory of classi®cation learning. Psychologi-
±
cal Review, 85, 207 238.
Medin, D.L., & Smith, E.E. (1981). Strategies and classi®cation learning. Journal of Experi-
±
mental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 241 253.
Medin, D.L., & Wattenmaker, W.D. (1987). Category cohesiveness, theories, and cognitive
±
archeology. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 25 62). Cam-
bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, G.L., & Allopenna, P.D. (1994). The locus of knowledge eŒects in concept
learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20,
±
909 919.
Murphy, G.L., & Medin, D.L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psycho-
±
logical Review, 92, 289 316.
Murphy, G.L., & Spalding, T.L. (1995). Knowledge, similarity, and concept formation. Psy-
±
chologica Belgica, 35, 127 144.
Nakamura, G.V. (1985). Knowledge-based classi®cation of ill-de®ned categories. Memory
±
and Cognition, 13, 377 384.
Nosofsky, R. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classi®cation. Journal of
±
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 104 114.
Nosofsky, R. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experi-
±
mental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 54 65.
±
Nosofsky, R.M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identi®cation categorization relation-
±
ship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39 57.
Nosofsky, R.M. (1992a). Exemplar-based approach to relating categorization, identi®cation,
and recognition. In F.G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cogni-
±
tion (pp. 363 393). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Nosofsky, R.M. (1992b). Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. In A. Healy, S.
±
Kosslyn, & R. ShiŒrin (Eds.), Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 1, pp. 149 167).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Nosofsky, R.M., Clark, S.E., & Shin, H.J. (1989). Rules and exemplars in categorization,
identi®cation, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
±
and Cognition, 15, 282 304.
Nosofsky, R.M., & Kruschke, J.K. (1992). Investigations of an exemplar-based connectionist
model of category learning. In D.L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motiva-
±
tion (Vol. 28, pp. 207 250). New York: Academic Press.
Pazzani, M.J. (1991). In¯ uence of prior knowledge on concept acquisition: Experimental and
computational results. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cog-
±
nition, 17, 416 432.
Posner, M.I., & Keele, S.W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experi-
±
mental Psychology, 77, 353 363.
±
Reed, S.K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382 407.
Rosch E.H (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental
±
Psychology: General, 104, 192 233.
Schyns, P.G., & Rodet, L. (1997). Categorization creates functional features. Journal of
±
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 681 696.
Spalding, T.L., & Murphy, G.L. (1996). EŒects of background knowledge on category con-
struction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22,
±
525 538.