P. Botella et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 398 (2011) 143–149
149
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Huntsman Polyurethanes and CICYT
(MAT2006-14274-C02-01), Project Prometeo from Generalitat
Valenciana, Project MULTICAT (Consolider-Ingenio 2010) and Fun-
dación Areces for financial support.
References
[1] R.E. Kirk, F. Orthmer, J.I. Kroschwitz, M. Howe-Grant, Kirk-Othmerˇıs Encyclo-
pedia of Chemical Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991.
[2] APC Plastics Industry Producer Statistic Group, as compiled by VERIS Consult-
[3] G. Weneger, M. Brandt, L. Duda, J. Hofmann, B. Klecszewski, D. Koch, R.J. Kumpf,
H. Orzesek, H.G. Pirkl, C. Six, C. Steinlein, M. Weisbeck, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 221
(2001) 303–335.
[4] A. de Angelis, P. Ingallina, C. Perego, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43 (2004) 1169–1178,
and references therein.
[5] J.L. Nafzinger, L.A. Rader, I.J. Seward, Jr., US Patent 4,554,378 (1985).
[6] G. Saischek, F. Fuchs, G. Stern, EP Patent 78,414 (1983).
[7] L.J. Chen, J. Jimenez, WO Patent 09/129286 (2009).
[8] E.T. Marquis, L.W. Watts, M. Gipson, US Patent 4,284,815 (1981).
[9] E.T. Marquis, L.W. Watts, US Patent 4,284,816 (1981).
[10] F.F. Frulla, A.A.R. Sayigh, H. Ulrich, P.J. Whitman, US Patent 4,039,580 (1977).
[11] F.F. Frulla, A.A.R. Sayigh, H. Ulrich, P.J. Whitman, US Patent 4,039,581 (1977).
[12] F.F. Frulla, A.A.R. Sayigh, H. Ulrich, P.J. Whitman, US Patent 4,092,343 (1978).
[13] R.A. Prater, N.N. Shah, US Patent 4,294,987 (1981).
[14] F.E. Bentley, US Patent 3,362,979 (1968).
[15] E.T. Marquis, US Patent 3,971,829 (1976).
[16] E.T. Marquis, H. Schulze, US Patent 4,172,847 (1979).
[17] C. Perego, A. de Angelis, A. Bosetti, WO Patent 01/74755 (2001).
[18] C. Perego, A. de Angelis, O. Farias, A. Bosetti, BE Patent 1013456 (2002).
[19] C. Perego, A. de Angelis, A. Carati, C. Flego, R. Millini, C. Rizzo, G. Bellussi, Appl.
Catal. A: Gen. 307 (2006) 128–136.
Fig. 6. Rearrangement of the neutral condensate (A/F = 4.0 M; ∼1.5% H2O) over ITQ-
18 extrudates in a continuous flow fixed-bed reactor. (a) Production of primary (ꢀ)
and secondary amines (ꢁ); (b) 4,4ꢀ-DADPM/(2,2ꢀ + 2,4ꢀ-DADPM) (wt/wt) ratio. Other
experimental conditions: T = 125 ◦C; P = 4 bar; W/F = 1.00 h.
[20] K. Yoshihisa, T. Toshiro, H. Tetsuo, EP Patent 329,367 (1989).
[21] M. Clerici, G. Bellussi, U. Romano, US Patent 5,241,119 (1993).
[22] C. Perego, A. de Angelis, O. Farias, A. Bosetti, US Patent 6,380,433 (2000).
[23] A. de Angelis, C. Flego, O. Farias, A. Bosetti, WO Patent 02/20458 (2002).
[24] A. de Angelis, C. Perego, O. Farias, A. Bosetti, WO Patent 02/88067 (2002).
[25] M. Salzinger, M.B. Fichtl, J.A. Lercher, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 393 (2011) 189–194.
[26] A. Corma, P. Botella, C. Mitchell, Chem. Commun. (2004) 2008–2010.
[27] A. Corma, V. Fornés, S.B. Pergher, T.L.M. Maesen, J.G. Buglass, Nature 396 (1998)
353–356.
∼0.5%. Lower levels of N-methylated impurities (0.1–0.3%) can be
obtained when the process is operated at lower temperatures for
the initial conversion of aminal to ABAs.
4. Conclusions
Delaminated materials ITQ-2, ITQ-6 and ITQ-18 are active and
selective for the synthesis of DADPM. The exfoliation process allows
excellent accessibility of their acid sites to reactant molecules as
well as fast desorption of products. As a consequence, these cata-
lysts offer significant advantages over conventional zeolites for the
synthesis of DADPM: (i) Higher activity; (ii) Lower levels of impu-
rities formation (basically, N-methylated products); (iii) Ability to
control product selectivity, as the amines distribution can be tuned
according to the topology of the delaminated material. In the case of
ITQ-18, the interaction of the intermediate 4-ABA with its surface
and the 4-substitution are favored, thus, resulting in the highest
selectivity to the most desired isomer 4,4ꢀ-DADPM. This catalyst
constitutes a real option for replacing HCl in the industrial produc-
tion of DADPM by a non-salt producing catalytic system based in a
solid silico–aluminate with zeolite type structure where the active
sites are highly accessible through the external surface.
[28] A. Corma, U. Díaz, M.E. Domine, V. Fornés, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000)
2804–2809.
[29] A. Corma, V. Fornés, U. Díaz, Chem. Commun. (2001) 2642–2643.
[30] S. Zanardi, A. Alberti, G. Cruciani, A. Corma, V. Fornés, M. Brunelli, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 4933–4937.
ˇ
[31] W.J. Roth, J. Cejka, Catal. Sci. Technol. (2011), doi:10.139/c0cy00027b.
[32] I.Y. Chan, P.A. Labun, M. Pan, S.I. Zones, Microporous Mater. 3 (1995) 409–418.
[33] L. Schreyeck, P. Caullet, J.C. Mougenel, J.L. Guth, B. Marier, Microporous Mater.
6 (1996) 259–271.
[34] T.V. Whittam, US Patent 5,266,541 (1993).
[35] C.A. Emeis, J. Catal. 141 (1993) 347–354.
[36] P. Botella, A. Corma, M.T. Navarro, F. Rey, G. Sastre, J. Catal. 217 (2003) 406–416.
[37] M. Salzinger, J.A. Lercher, Green Chem. 13 (2011) 149–155.
[38] P.J. Whitman, F.F. Frulla, G.H. Temme, F.A. Stuber, Tetrahedron Lett. 27 (1986)
1887–1990.
[39] J. Plöchl, Ber. Deut. Chem. Ges. 21 (1888) 2117–2119.
[40] F.P. Recchia, H. Ulrich, US Patent 3,676,497 (1972).
[41] A. Corma et al. Data to be published elsewhere.
[42] C. Perego, A. de Angelis, O. Farias, A. Bosetti, WO Patent 01/97969 (2001).