GEORGE Et al.
9
|
From the docking pose of ligand (Figure 7; Supplementary
During the MD run of the orlistat, H bonding was pre-
dominantly formed with Gly-76, Phe-77, His-151, Ser-152
while π-alkyl interactions were observed with Ile-78, Pro-
180, Leu-213, Trp-252, Arg-256, Ala-259 etc.
In case of 6d, initially, H bond interactions were formed
with the Ser 152 whereas prominent π–π interactions with lid
domain amino acids (Phe 77, Tyr 114 and Phe 215) were ob-
served throughout the simulation. Apart from that, π-sulphur
interactions were also exhibited with lid domain and catalytic
triad amino acids.
In case of 6e, H-bond has formed with the Ser 152 during
the later stages of the simulations, whereas π–π interactions
were prominent during the entire tenure. Numerous π-alkyl
interactions were observed, wherein various amino acids
such as Ile 78, Pro 180, Arg 256, Ala 259, Ala 260, and Leu
264 were involved. Additionally, 6e exerted π-sulphur inter-
action with Phe 77, Tyr 114, His-151, Phe 215 and His-263.
Data), it is clearly observed that these analogues formed in-
teractions such as hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking, π-sulphur
and π-cation with the active site amino acids. Interestingly,
the PL inhibitory variation trends across different substituents
and their MolDock scores exhibited a significant correlation
(Pearson's r = .8682, p < .05). For instance, 6d, the most ac-
tive analogue from the series (IC50-6.19 µM) possessed a top
docking score of −115.619 kcal/mol while, 6e, the second
most active (IC50-8.96 µM) in the series exhibited a MolDock
score of −108.706 kcal/mol. The majority of the molecules
exhibited a consistent H-bond interaction with Gly76, Phe77,
His 151 and Ser152. Further, prominent π–π interactions
were observed with the lid domain amino acid (Phe 77, Phe
215). An π-sulphur interaction has been observed with the
catalytic triad amino acid, His 263. Moreover, π-cation inter-
action with Arg 256 has also been observed that suggested
the probable role of these analogues for the opening of lid
domain amino acid.
Orlistat possessing a reactive lactone ring, will break
during the interaction with PL and results in the formation
of reversible covalent bond inhibition (Egloff et al., 1995).
Orlistat interacted with 1LPB via numerous hydrogens
bonding (with Phe-77, Ser-152 and His-263) as well as π-
alkyl interactions (Supplementary Data). Since orlistat
contains long alkyl chains, numerous π-alkyl interactions
(Tyr-114, Trp-252, Arg-256, Phe-258, Ala-259) were ob-
served in the active site of 1LPB. However, synthesized ana-
logues exerted a lesser extent of π-alkyl interaction. Overall,
the Mol Dock score of orlistat (−127.750 kcal/mol) was sig-
nificantly higher than that of synthesized analogues (−82.373
to −115.619 kcal/mol). This might be due to the variations in
the π-alkyl interaction as well as the presence of the reactive
constrained lactone ring in orlistat.
4
CONCLUSION
|
By considering the PL inhibitory potential of indole and
TZD analogues for PL inhibition, the present study aimed
to develop indole-TZD hybrid analogues as a potential PL
inhibitor. A series of indole-TZD hybrid analogues (6a to
6ab) have been synthesized and evaluated for their in vitro
PL inhibition activity. Amongst the screened analogues,
6d exhibited a potential PL inhibition (IC50-6.19 µM), fol-
lowed by 6e (IC50-8.16 µM). Enzyme kinetics established
a reversible competitive type of PL inhibition by these
synthesized analogues. Fluorescence study further sup-
ported these facts, wherein, the presence of one binding
site has been confirmed. Apart from this, a greater binding
efficiency of these analogues with PL also suggested by
the fluorescence spectroscopic studies. Molecular dock-
ing results further supported the PL inhibitory potential
of titled analogues, wherein significant correlations be-
tween the PL inhibition and MolDock score (Pearson
correlation r = .8682, p < .05) were obtained. Moreover,
the MD simulation revealed a stable confirmation of both
analogues throughout the run. Preliminary investigation
revealed that the electron-withdrawing groups on indole-
thiazolidinedione hybrids exerted decremental PL inhibi-
tory potentials. Thus, substitutions with electron-donating
groups might be helpful for the further PL inhibitory po-
tentials. Apart from that, the overall hydrophobicity of the
hybrid analogues can also be potentiated by incorporating
numerous long-chain carbon atoms similar to the reported
scaffolds. For instance, numerous natural products con-
taining isoprenoids (prenyl/geranyl/farnesyl) have been
explored due to their potent PL inhibitory activities. In
conclusion, the present study shed lights into the poten-
tial of indole-TZD hybrid analogues and further detailed
Various interactions of the analogues with PL (1LPB)
were identified by using molecular modelling studies.
Further, a 20 ns MD simulation has been performed for orli-
stat, 6d and 6e, that provides information about the stability
of the binding mode and interactions in a dynamic environ-
ment. Orlistat, 6d and 6e exhibited a stable binding confir-
mation throughout the MD simulation run (Supplementary
Data, Figure 7). Orlistat exerted a maximum deviation of
≈ 0.4 nm (throughout the MD run) while analogues 6d and
6e exhibited a maximum deviation of ≈ 0.8 nm (at ≈ 12.5
and 7.5 ns), respectively. Furthermore, a stable radius of
gyration indicated the compactness of the 1LPB during the
MD run with studied molecules. The obtained interactions
during the course MD simulation of these analogues 1LPB
complex during 20 ns of MD simulation are summarized in
Supplementary Data. The ligand analogues exhibited numer-
ous interactions such as H bonding, π–π interaction, π-alkyl
and π-sulphur interactions, while orlistat exerted H bonding
and π-alkyl interactions.