7034
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 116, No. 16, 22 April 2002
W. S. McGivern and S. W. North
4 I. Nadler, H. Reisler, M. Noble, and C. Wittig, Chem. Phys. Lett. 108, 115
͑1984͒.
5 I. Nadler, M. Noble, H. Reisler, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 2608
͑1985͒.
6 I. Nadler, H. Reisler, M. Noble, and C. Wittig, Chem. Phys. Lett. 84, 115
͑1984͒.
7 C. X. W. Qian, M. Noble, I. Nadler, H. Reisler, and C. Wittig, J. Chem.
Phys. 83, 5573 ͑1985͒.
8 C. X. W. Qian, A. Ogai, H. Reisler, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 209
͑1989͒.
9 L. R. Khundkar, J. L. Knee, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 77
͑1987͒.
10 S. J. Klippenstein, L. R. Khundkar, A. H. Zewail, and R. A. Marcus, J.
Chem. Phys. 89, 4761 ͑1988͒.
11 S. J. Klippenstein, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 6469 ͑1991͒.
12 S. J. Klippenstein, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1996 ͑1994͒.
13 P. Pechukas and J. C. Light, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 3281 ͑1965͒; C. E. Klots,
J. Phys. Chem. 75, 1526 ͑1971͒; J. Troe, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 6017 ͑1983͒.
14 C. Wittig, I. Nadler, H. Reisler, M. Noble, J. Catanzarite, and G.
Radhakrishnan, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5581 ͑1985͒.
15 W. L. Hase, Acc. Chem. Res. 31, 659 ͑1998͒.
16 S. W. North and G. E. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 60 ͑1997͒.
17 S. W. North, A. J. Marr, A. Furlan, and G. E. Hall, J. Phys. Chem. A 101,
9224 ͑1997͒.
FIG. 7. Calculated values of the translationally and rotationally depolarized
v–J correlation for the 355 nm photodissociation of NO2 at 295 K. The
solid line represents the v–J correlations with both the translational and
rotational corrections, and the dashed line represents the v–J correlations
with only the translational correction.
18 R. Li, A. Derecskei-Kovacs, and S. W. North, Chem. Phys. 254, 309
͑2000͒.
19 R. Li, W. S. McGivern, and S. W. North, Chem. Phys. Lett. 334, 47
͑2001͒.
tional states, the depolarization factors decrease slowly with
increasing values of J0 . However, as the coincident frag-
ments become higher in energy, less translational energy is
available, and the rotational depolarization becomes more
important. When the coincident rotational quantum number,
NNO , exceeds 30, products may only be observed from ro-
tationally excited parent molecules. For these coincident
states, the depolarization factor begins at Ϫ0.50 at threshold
and increases smoothly for each coincident NO state. In
practice, this correction is applied to the calculated PST v–J
correlations, and the translational depolarization correction is
subsequently applied to these values.
As a test of the applicability of this depolarization
method, we have calculated rotational depolarization factors
for the photodissociation of NO2 at 355 nm in a room tem-
perature bulb. Since NO2 is triatomic, a limiting v–J corre-
lation of Ϫ0.5 is expected for all J states in the absence of
parent translational and rotational motion. This provides an
ideal method for directly measuring the depolarization fac-
tors. Baker et al. have measured v–J correlations for NO2
photodissociation under these conditions using laser induced
fluorescence ͑LIF͒ detection of the NO products.39 For jNO
ϭ14.5, the authors measured values for 00(22) of Ϫ0.31
Ϯ0.12 and Ϫ0.25Ϯ0.12 for the F1 and F2 spin states, re-
spectively. Shown in Fig. 7 are calculated depolarization fac-
tors as a function of the detected NO rotational state. The
solid line includes both translational and rotational contribu-
tions, while the dashed line shows the effect of the transla-
tional depolarization alone. The depolarized value of the v–J
correlation at jNOϭ14.5 was calculated to be Ϫ0.27, in good
agreement with the experimentally measured correlations.
20 E. A. Dorko, P. H. Flynn, U. Grimm, K. Scheller, and G. W. Maeller, J.
Phys. Chem. 81, 2088 ͑1977͒.
21 J. R. Morton and H. W. Wilcox, Inorg. Synth. 4, 48 ͑1953͒.
22 S. W. North and G. E. Hall, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51, 243 ͑2000͒.
23 R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1866 ͑1986͒.
24 S. W. North, A. J. Marr, A. Furlan, and G. E. Hall, J. Phys. Chem. A 101,
9224 ͑1997͒.
25 W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Nu-
merical Recipes in Fortran, 2nd ed. ͑Cambridge University Press, New
York, 1992͒.
26 C. Taatjes, J. Cline, and S. Leone, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 6554 ͑1990͒.
27 C. G. Morgan, M. Drabbels, and A. M. Wodtke, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 7460
͑1996͒.
28 Since the v–J correlations in the present paper were found to be small, we
have tested this procedure on previously obtained data from NCCN ͑Ref.
16͒, which is characterized by significantly higher values of 00(22). De-
spite the significant differences between the Q- and R-branches for NCCN
at early times, the late time data show very good overlap, and we are
confident this procedure is a valid means for ensuring the correct widths
from scan to scan.
29 T. Baer and W. L. Hase, Unimolecular Reaction Dynamics ͑Oxford, New
York, 1996͒.
30 As suggested in Ref. 29, the value of the C6 term was determined from the
bond energy and the equilibrium bond distance. The value of C6 used in
the present work is 6.37ϫ106 cmϪ1 Å6.
31 P. Pechukas and J. C. Light, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 3281 ͑1965͒.
32 D. Cerny, R. Bacis, G. Guelachvili, and F. Roux, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 73,
154 ͑1978͒.
33 S. W. North and G. E. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1864 ͑1996͒.
34 S. W. North and G. E. Hall, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 101, 459 ͑1997͒.
35 NCNO is nonlinear in the ground state with rotational constants A
ϭ2.71 cmϪ1, Bϭ0.180 cmϪ1, and Cϭ0.168 cmϪ1; R. Dickinson, G.
W. Kirby, J. G. Sweeny, and J. K. Tyler, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2
74, 1393 ͑1978͒.
36 W. H. Green, Jr., C. B. Moore, and W. F. Polik, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
43, 591 ͑1992͒.
37 M. L. Costen, H. Katayanagi, and G. E. Hall, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 10247
͑2000͒.
1
¨
J. Pfab, J. Hager, and W. Krieger, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 266 ͑1983͒.
38 J. D. Barnwell, J. G. Loesser, and D. R. Herschbach, J. Phys. Chem. 87,
2781 ͑1983͒.
2 I. Nadler, J. Pfab, G. Radhakrishnan, H. Reisler, and C. Wittig, J. Chem.
Phys. 79, 2088 ͑1983͒.
39 R. P. Baker, M. L. Costen, G. Hancock, G. A. D. Ritchie, and D. Sum-
merfield, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2, 661 ͑2000͒.
3 I. Nadler, J. Pfab, H. Reisler, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 653
͑1984͒.
202.28.191.34 On: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:23:15