(
)
R.C. Richter et al.rChemical Physics Letters 319 2000 341–348
345
is available for translation and the NO fragments are produced with velocities of 610 and 670 mrs. The TOF
profile, Fig. 2, shows that no fast NO fragments are formed and that NO production occurs exclusively via
1
Ž .
reaction 2 with O D as the co-fragment.
Ž
.
In contrast, Fig. 3 shows the TOF profiles obtained by excitation of overlapping lines in the A–X 2–5 band
Ž
.
Ž .
at 247.995 nm. In this case we excite the overlapping Q2 43 and R1 36 transitions probing fragments in both
spin–orbit components in Õs5, Js42.5, 36.5. The photodissociation energetics are summarized in Table 2. In
1
Ž .
this case production of O D is not energetically feasible and only reaction 1 is open, predicting NO fragment
velocities of ;1700 mrs with O3P as the co-fragment. The observed TOF profiles are consistent with this and
again indicate an anisotropic dissociation via a parallel transition. We obtained TOF profiles for NO fragments
produced in vibrational levels Õs0–5. In some cases analysis is complicated by simultaneous excitation of
multiple levels, however the results are consistent with O1D being the exclusive co-fragment produced with NO
Õs0, 1, 2, 3. For NO Õs4, 5 O3P is the only energetically allowed co-fragment.
1
Ž
.
We attempted to directly monitor O D via 3q1 REMPI at ;276 nm, however in this case production of
O1D via multiphoton dissociation by the tightly focused probe laser dominated over production via the 212.8
nm photolysis. O3P was detected via excitation of the 3p 3P – 2p 3P2, 1, 0 transitions at 226 nm. Strong ‘probe
only’ signals were observed at the excitation wavelength of each spin–orbit component. Fig. 4 shows TOF
profiles for O3P2 obtained after photolysis with the horizontally and vertically polarized 212.8 nm laser and
after subtraction of the probe signal. In this case the coproduced NO fragments can be formed in any of the 12
energetically accessible vibrational energy levels and hence the O3P2 can be formed with velocities ranging
from 0 to almost 5000 mrs. In contrast to the TOF profiles of the NO fragments shown in Figs. 2 and 3 which
have well-defined translational energies, Fig. 4 is a superimposition of many such profiles and consequently is
rather more difficult to interpret. The energy scale in the figure shows the O3P2 fragment velocities
corresponding to the production of NO in a specific vibrational level. It is immediately clear that there is no
production of fast O3P2 atoms which would correspond to co-fragment NO molecules produced in the first four
vibrational levels. Our TOF profiles of NO fragments produced in Õs4, 5 are indicative of anisotropic
dissociation, clearly the coproduced O3P2 has an identical anisotropy. If this holds for all O3P2 production then
the lack of a clearly defined anisotropic profile in Fig. 4 indicates that O3P2 must be formed with a significant
fast and slow components. A more detailed analysis would require a simulation of the superimposed profiles and
would require a knowledge of the NO vibrational state distribution in Õs5–12. For O3P1 we found a
significant signal due to the probe laser but very little signal due to 212.8 nm photolysis, a direct comparison of
the respective ion signals at similar photolysis powers gives an O3P2:O3P1 ratio of ;11:1. For O3P0, variation
in photolysis and probe power precluded determining a ratio of the signals but again suggested that the signal is
much smaller than that obtained for O3P2.
Ž .
Ž .
The relative importance of channels 1 and 2 can be assessed from yields of the photofragments, both from
an analysis of the vibrational product distribution of the NO fragments and by directly measuring the relative
yields of O1D and O3P. REMPI excitation spectra were obtained by scanning the probe laser between 220 and
Table 2
Energetics of photofragment production at 246.214 nm
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž .
Excitation: 247.995 nm, Fig. 2a , A–X 2–5 , Q2 43 , Q12 43 , R1 36 , P21 36 . Branch: Q2 43 , Q12 43 , Js42.5, R1 36 , P21 36 ,
Js36.5
3
Ž .
Reaction 1 , NOqO P
J
Available energy
NO velocity
O3P velocity
y1
Ž
cm
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
mrs
mrs
36.5
42.5
10421
9831
1700
1651
3187
3096
1
Ž .
Reaction 2 , NOqO D: endothermic