Cabail et al.
a
Scheme 2
Hendrich et al. recently reported that when 0.48 mM of
fully reduced HAO was put under 1 atm NO•, most of the
hemes were reoxidized.38 The lowest potential HAO hemes
(E° < -150 mV)37,39 might be capable of reducing NO• back
to NH2OH; however, much of the heme oxidation in these
experiments was probably coupled to the reduction of 2 equiv
of NO• to N2O, via the shunt pathway shown in Figure 2.
N2O is the most common product of nonenzymatic NH2OH
oxidation by metals,46 and significant amounts of N2O are
released in vitro when HAO reacts with NH2OH.18,47 N2O
is also produced by Nm europaea in vivo, though in this
case HAO appears to be one of several sources of the
gas.18,48,49 In our experiments, the limited oxidation of the
c-heme pool following nitrosylation shows that, with [NO•]
of up to 60 µM and on the time scale investigated herein,
N2O is not released from HAO. Such a release would require
the concomitant removal of another electron from the c-heme
pool.
a The HAO c hemes are labeled with their redox potentials subscripted
in brackets.
is consistent with the fact that at most one electron is lost
from the HAO c-heme pool, irrespective of the amount of
Ru(III) or NO• photogenerated (Figure 6).
Discussion
Figure 2 suggests that NH2OH binds to P460 to give species
2, and is then oxidized and deprotonated to give species 3.
If the reaction begins with HAO fully oxidized, and is carried
out in the absence of an external electron acceptor such as
cyt c554, then one of the electrons initially removed from 2
will end up on the high potential heme 2, and the other will
equilibrate between the two 0 mV hemes (3 and 8).37,39,40
The subsequent deprotonation step leaves the active site in
the {P460(NO)}7 state, and HAO overall in the state suggested
by Scheme 2 to result from nitrosylating the 3-e- reduced
enzyme. The complete dashed pathway in Figure 2 corre-
sponds to Scheme 2, with a protonation step added. Our
experiments do not reveal whether the product of Scheme
2, eq 2, is subsequently protonated. However, they clearly
demonstrate that in 4-e- reduced HAO (as would be obtained
by adding 1 equiv of NH2OH to a fully oxidized enzyme
subunit) only two electrons will be transferred to the c-heme
pool, while the other two will remain on the P460-NO
moiety. If Scheme 2, eq 2, did not lie far to the right, then
in the nitrosylation experiments the c-heme pool should be
oxidized by less than 1 equiv, even at saturating [NO•].
The fact that the c-heme pool was not oxidized by more
than 1 e-/subunit in the nitrosylation experiments provides
excellent evidence that, upon addition of 1 equiv NH2OH to
the fully oxidized enzyme, the first two electrons would be
readily transferred to the c-heme pool, as proposed in Figure
2. Presumably, these intramolecular electron transfer steps
would be coupled to concomitant H+ transfers. The HAO
crystal structure shows that Asp 267 and His 268 are oriented
toward the P460 active site, and it has been suggested that
these residues may contribute to coupled e--H+ transfer.10
Recent papers report the isolation of stable Fe and Ru
porphyrin species best formulated as the protonated forms
of {M(NO)}8 ({M(HNO)}8).44,45 For HAO, such a species
would sit between 2 and 3 in Figure 2. In our experi-
ments, the generation of a more highly reduced P460 nitrosy-
lation product, such as {P460(HNO)},8 would require the
removal of two electrons from the c-heme pool. Again, the
results show that the c-heme pool is reduced by only one
electron following nitrosylation, so {P460(HNO)}8 is not being
generated.
From the hyperbolic fit in Figure 6, one can obtain an
equilibrium binding constant K ) (7.7 ( 0.6) × 104 M-1
for the net nitrosylation reaction of Scheme 2. This value is
∼5 times higher than that for typical ferriheme proteins such
as Mb and Hb (∼1.4 × 104 M-1),19,35 but orders of magnitude
smaller than that for the corresponding ferroheme proteins
(∼1011 M-1).19 Presumably, the stability of {P460(NO)}7
relative to oxidation by the 0 mV c-hemes helps to minimize
NO• release from the enzyme during turnover, which should
be higher from a {P460(NO)}6 moiety (but see below).
However, excessive stabilization of {P460(NO)}7 would trap
this moiety and prevent catalysis.
Making the assumption that K2 > 10 (on the basis of the
fact that Scheme 2, eq 2, lies far to the right) provides an
upper estimate of ∼8 × 103 M-1 for the value K1, which
governs the formation of {P460(NO)}6 from NO• and 1
(Scheme 2, eq 1). This low value suggests that NO• should
bind only weakly to fully oxidized HAO, in which stabiliza-
tion of {P460(NO)}7 by IET from the c-heme pool is not an
option. As mentioned above, NO• normally binds weakly in
{Fe(NO)}6 hemoproteins,19,35 and it binds even more weakly
in nonprotein {Fe(NO)}6 moieties.50 However, in their recent
report Hendrich and co-workers reported obtaining an
extremely tenacious {P460(NO)}6 species after putting fully
oxidized HAO under 1 atm NO•.38 Indeed, after removing
all the free NO• from solution, these workers could only
remove the bound NO• by irradiating the solution with
intense white light. These results suggest that on a time scale
longer than was monitored in our experiments, a protein
conformational change can trap NO• in the active site, even
(45) Lee, J. Y.; Richter-Addo, G. B. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 98,
1247-1250.
(46) Wieghardt, K. AdV. Inorg. Bioinorg. Mech. 1984, 3, 213-274.
(47) Hooper, A. B.; Terry, K. R. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1979, 571,
12-20.
(48) Beaumont, H. J. E.; Hommes, N. G.; Sayavedra-Soto, L. A.; Arp, D.
J.; Arciero, D. M.; Hooper, A. B.; Westerhoff, H. V.; van Spanning,
R. J. M. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 2557-2560.
(49) Beaumont, H. J. E.; van Schooten, B.; Lens, S. I.; Westerhoff, H. V.;
van Spanning, R. J. M. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 4417-4421.
(50) Ellison, M. K.; Scheidt, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5210-
5219.
(44) Sulc, F.; Immoos, C. E.; Pervitsky, D.; Farmer, P. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 1096-1101 and references therein.
230 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2005