Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Wecksler et al.
nitrosyl and nitrito complexes that are capable of the photo-
chemical generation of NO for therapeutic applications.7-10
A property of considerable importance for the use of
photoactivated agents in ViVo is the ability to absorb
wavelengths of light where tissue penetration is maximized
and that are sufficiently energetic to labilize the metal-
nitrosyl bond selectively. For mammalian tissue, near-
infrared (NIR; λ ) 800-1100 nm) light has the greatest
transmission.11 Therefore, one focus of our current research
is the development of compounds that can be subjected to
single- or two-photon excitation (SPE or TPE) by NIR light,
resulting in the photochemical production of NO. TPE is
especially interesting given that this allows access to excited
states that would require near-ultraviolet wavelengths if
activation were to be achieved by SPE. Another key
advantage of TPE for pro-drug activation is spatial selectively
visible wavelengths, thus limiting potential in ViVo applica-
tions. In this context, dye-derivatized compounds, such as
Fluor-RSE (RS ) 2-thioethyl ester of fluorescein)17,18 and
PPIX-RSE (RS ) bis(2-thioethyl)diester protoporphyrin
IX),15,16 were prepared with the goal of imparting specific
optical properties to improve the light harvesting ability and
the photochemical response to longer wavelength light. Both
PPIX-RSE and Fluor-RSE proved to be much more
photochemically effective than the simple RSE complexes
at longer wavelengths, since the dye chromophores dramati-
cally improve the light collecting efficiency for longer visible
wavelengths under continuous photolysis conditions where
single-photon excitation (only) would be expected.15,17
Although attaching antennae to the iron sulfur nitrosyl
cluster improved the light harvesting efficiency, the quantum
yield for photodecomposition for these clusters decreases at
longer irradiation wavelengths.15,17 An alternative strategy
to address this issue is to use TPA in the NIR to achieve
up-conversion to higher energy state(s) from which the
desired photochemistry results. This was first achieved
qualitatively with PPIX-RSE, for which TPE with 810 nm
femtosecond pulses leads both to weak emission from the
PPIX chromophore and to photochemical NO labilization.16
While this provided “proof of concept”, the poor solubility
of PPIX-RSE and the recognition that porphyrins are very
modest TPA chromophores (δ ) 2 GM for PPIX, 1 GM )
10-50 cm4 s photon-1 molecule-1)20 led us to develop other
compounds such as Fluor-RSE with fluorescein antennae.17
Fluorescein has well-characterized photophysical behavior,
2
achieved from the intensity-squared dependence (A ∼ I0 ,
where I0 is the intensity of the incident light and A is the
absorption rate) of the two-photon absorption (TPA) process,
since the highest probability of TPA is at the focal point of
a focused excitation beam.12 For analogous reasons, TPE has
drawn attention in strategies for photodynamic therapy
involving singlet oxygen generation in tissue via organic dye
photosensitization and for the photochemical “uncaging” of
bioactive substances.13
Recent studies at the University of California at Santa
Barbara (UCSB) have been concerned with the photochemi-
cal properties of Roussin’s red salt esters (Fe2(µ-RS)2(NO)4;
RSEs), which can be prepared from Roussin’s red salt (RRS)
(eq 1).14-19 The simple esters (R ) -CH3, -CH2CH3, -CH2-
(12) (a) Denk, W.; Strickler, J. H.; Webb, W. W. Science 1990, 248, 73-
76. (b) Ko¨nig, K. J. Microsc. (Oxford) 2000, 200, 83-104. (b) So, P.
T. C.; Dong, C. Y.; Masters, B. R.; Berland, K. M. Annu. ReV. Biomed.
Eng. 2000, 2, 399-429. (c) Zhou, W.; Kuebler, S. M.; Braun, K. L.;
Yu, T.; Cammack, J. K.; Ober, C. K.; Perry, J. W.; Marder, S. R.
Science 2002, 296, 1106-9.
(13) (a) Dougherty, T. J.; Kaufman, J. E.; Goldbarb, A.; Weishaupt, K.
R.; Boyle, D.; Mittleman, A. Cancer Res. 1978, 38, 2628. (b)
Bodaness, R. S.; Heller, D. F.; Krasinski, J.; King, D. S. J. Biol. Chem.
1986, 261, 12098-12101. (c) Fischer, W. G.; Partridge, W. P., Jr.;
Dees, C.; Wachter, E. A. Photochem. Photobiol. 1997, 66, 141-155.
(d) Bhawalkar, J. D.; Kumar, N. D.; Zhao, C.-F.; Prasad, P. N. J.
Clin. Lasers Med. Surg. 1997, 15, 201-204. (e) Jaconi, M.; Pyle, J.;
Bortolon, R.; Ou, J.; Clapham, D. Curr. Biol. 1997, 7, 599-602. (f)
Lipp, P.; Niggli, E. J. Physiol. 1998, 508, 801-809. (g) Brown, E.
B.; Webb, W. W. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 291, 356-380. (h) Furuta,
T.; Wang, S. S.; Dantzker, J. L.; Dore, T. M.; Bybee, W. J.; Callaway,
E. M.; Denk, W.; Tsien, R. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96,
1193-1200. (i) Frederiksen, P. K.; Jørgensen, M.; Ogilby, P. R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1215-1221. (j) Dichtel, W. R.; Serin, J.
M.; Edder, C.; Fre´chet, J. M. J.; Matuszewski, M.; Tan, L.-S.;
Ohulchanskyy, T. Y.; Prasad, P. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
5380-5381. (k) Nikolenko, V.; Yuste, R.; Zayat, L.; Baraldo, L. M.;
Etchenique, R. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1752-1754.
CH2OH, -CH2CH2SO3) undergo photochemical decomposi-
tion with moderate quantum yields (Φd ) 0.02-0.13) when
irradiated with near-UV light and release ∼4 mol of NO
per mole of cluster decomposed.14 However, the absorptivity
of the iron sulfur nitrosyl chromophore is quite low at longer
(7) (a) Hoshino, M.; Ozawa, K.; Seki, H.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 9568-9575. (b) Lorkovic, I. M.; Miranda, K. M.; Lee, B.;
Bernhard, S.; Schoonover, J. R.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 11674-11683. (c) Laverman, L.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 11614-11622. (d) Joseph, C.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 6737-6743.
(8) (a) Works, C. F.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7592-
7593. (b) Works, C. F.; Jocher, C. J.; Bart, G. D.; Bu, X.; Ford, P. C.
Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3728-3739.
(9) (a) De Leo, M.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1980-
1981. (b) De Leo, M.; Ford, P. C. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 208, 47-
59. (c) DeRosa, F.; Bu, X.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 4157-
4165. (d) DeRosa, F.; Bu, X.; Pohaku, K.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem.
2005, 44, 4166-4174.
(10) (a) Bourassa, J.; DeGraff, W.; Kudo, S.; Wink, D. A.; Mitchell, J. B.;
Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2853-2860. (b) Bourassa,
J.; Lee, B.; Bernard, S.; Schoonover, J.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem.
1999, 38, 2947-2952. (c) Bourassa, J.; Ford, P. C. Coord. Chem.
ReV. 2000, 200-202, 887-900.
(11) (a) Dougherty, T. J.; Marcus, S. L. Eur. J. Cancer 1992, 28A, 1734-
1742. (b) Master, B. R.; So, P. T.; Gratton, E. Biophys. J. 1997, 72,
2405-2412.
(14) Conrado, C. L.; Bourassa, J.; Egler, C.; Wecklser, S.; Ford, P. C. Inorg.
Chem. 2003, 42, 2288-2293.
(15) Conrado, C. L.; Wecksler, S.; Egler, C.; Magde, D.; Ford, P. C. Inorg.
Chem. 2004, 43, 5543-5549.
(16) Wecksler, S. R.; Mikhailovsky, A.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 13566-13567.
(17) Wecksler, S. R.; Hutchinson, J.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45,
1192-1200.
(18) Wecksler, S. R.; Mikhailovsky, A.; Korystov, D.; Ford, P. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3831-3837.
(19) (a) Roussin, F. Z. Ann. Chim. Phys. 1858, 52, 285. (b) Butler, A. R.;
Glidewell, C.; Li, M.-H. AdV. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 32, 335-393.
(20) Goyan, R. L.; Cramb, D. T. Photochem. Photobiol. 2000, 72, 821-
827.
396 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2007