.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
annulation of readily accessible phenols and unactivated
internal alkynes.
We started the investigation by reacting 4-nitrophenol
(1a) with diphenylacetylene (2a) in the presence of different
combinations of palladium catalysts and phosphine ligands. In
the presence of Pd(OAc)2, JohnPhos (L1) or dppe (L2) as
ligands, K2CO3 or Ag2CO3 as bases, and Cu(OAc)2·H2O as
oxidant in 1,4-dioxane, no reaction occurred or dimerization
of the phenol and/or alkyne was observed (entries 1 and 2).[21]
To our delight, the desired product 3a was formed in 40%
yield (GC analysis) under the catalytic conditions comprising
of [Pd2(dba)3], bathophenanthroline (L3), Ag2CO3, and
AgOAc in dioxane (entry 3). Interestingly, the use of Cu-
(OAc)2·H2O as oxidant and Ag2CO3 as base led to 3a with an
enhanced yield (entry 4). Among the range of Pd0 catalysts
and solvents that were surveyed, [Pd2(dba)3] and 1,4-dioxane
appeared to be optimal.[21] An extensive screening of various
combinations of catalysts, bases, and oxidants led to effective
catalytic conditions (conditions A: [Pd2(dba)3], L3, AgOAc,
and Cu(OAc)2·H2O), and 3a was isolated in 92% yield
(entry 5). Examination of other bidented ligands showed that
the 1,10-phenanthroline (L4) was equally efficient (entry 6),
while bathocuproine (L5) and 2,2’-bipyridyl (L6) produced
trace amounts of 3a (entries 7 and 8). These results show that
the Pd0 catalysts and the N-bearing bidented ligands are
pivotal to this transformation and 3a was not produced in the
absence of either [Pd2(dba)3] or L3.[21]
Entry
1
Catalyst
Ligand
Base
Yield of 3 [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1b
1b
1b
1b
1b
1b
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
L1
L2
L3
L3
L3
L4
L5
L6
L3
L3
L4
L4
L4
L4
K2CO3
n.d.
Ag2CO3
Ag2CO3
Ag2CO3
AgOAc
AgOAc
AgOAc
AgOAc
AgOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
n.d.
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
[Pd2(dba)3]
Pd(OAc)2
40[c]
60
100 (92)[d]
90
10
trace
trace
20
25
40
9
10
11
12[e]
13[f]
14[f]
100 (88)[d]
100 (51)[d]
[a] Reaction conditions: 1 (2.0 equiv), 2 (20 mg, 1.0 equiv, 0.11 mmol),
catalyst (5 mol%), ligand (10 mol%), base (2.0 equiv), Cu(OAc)2·H2O
(2.0 equiv), and 1,4-dioxane (2.0 mL) at 1308C for 24–48 h. n.d.=not
detected. [b] Conversion based on analysis of the crude by gas
chromatography (GC) using dodecane as internal standard. [c] AgOAc
was used as oxidant. [d] Yield of isolated product on 1.0 mmol scale.
[e] 1b (4.0 equiv) and base (4.0 equiv) was used. [f] 1b (5.0 equiv) and
base (5.0 equiv) was used. Entries in bold mark optimized reaction
conditions.
We recently demonstrated the hydrophenoxylation of
phenols with alkynes for the synthesis of arylvinyl ethers.[22]
A
suitable combination of base and solvent was essential for this
reaction to proceed, and we speculated that the acidity of the
phenol is crucial.[22] Therefore, we studied the reaction
between the electron-rich 4-methoxyphenol (1b) and 2a
under optimized conditions (entry 5, Table 1). Unfortunately,
only a trace of the desired benzofuran 3b was formed (GC
analysis; entry 9). Thus, various combinations of bases,
catalysts, ligands, and solvents were screened to find accept-
able catalytic conditions for the synthesis of 3b (see the
Supporting Information, Table S5).[21] Among the bases
examined, NaOAc was the most suitable (entry 10). The
yield of 3b was marginally enhanced to 25% when L4 was
employed (entry 11). Interestingly, performing the reaction
with 4.0 equivalents of phenol afforded 3b in 40% yield
(entry 12). Notably, an increased amount of 4-methoxyphenol
(5.0 equiv) with respect to 2a (1.0 equiv) significantly
enhanced the efficiency of the reaction and produced 3b in
88% yield (entry 13, conditions B). The catalyst Pd(OAc)2
was found to be moderate (entry 14).
We next turned our attention to the scope and functional-
group tolerance of this transformation. Scheme 2 summarizes
the annulation of various phenols with 2a. The nitro-
substituted benzofuran 3a was obtained in excellent yield
under conditions A in 24 h; in contrast, the known methods
for the synthesis of 3a involve multiple steps with overall poor
yield.[23] The presence of a cyano group did not affect the
reaction outcome, providing 3c in 70% yield. Interestingly,
ketone, aldehyde, and ester functionalities on the phenol were
inert to the reaction conditions, and the desired products 3d–f
were isolated in good yields. Surprisingly, conditions B were
superior over conditions A in the case of 4-hydroxybenzalde-
hyde (1e) and 4-hydroxymethylbenzoate (1 f); the reason for
this observation is unclear. The halogen functionalities (F and
Cl) were tolerated, and the reactions of 4-fluorophenol (1g)
and 4-chlorophenol (1h) with 2a under conditions B deliv-
ered the desired benzofurans. X-ray crystallographic analysis
confirms the structure of 3g.[24] We studied the relative
stability of common N- and O-protecting groups under the
current catalytic conditions. Unfortunately, 4-aminophenol or
N-methyl-4-aminophenol failed to react with 2a, whereas the
annulation between N-acetyl-4-aminophenol and 2a pro-
ceeded smoothly under conditions B, and 3i was exclusively
obtained, leaving the NHAc moiety untouched. We next
envisaged the reaction of a hydroquinone with 2a, which
would enlarge the molecular diversity; unfortunately, our
efforts to incorporate multiple benzofurans on hydroquinone
failed. Gratifyingly, the desired product 3j was obtained from
the mono-O-benzoyl protected hydroquinone (1j) and 2a in
good yield with the O-benzoate protecting group intact.
The electron-rich 4-methoxyphenol (1b) and 4-methyl-
phenol (1k) were both reacted with 2a under conditions B to
provide 3b and 3k in 88% and 70% yield, respectively.
Remarkably, when meta-substituted phenols were annulated
with 2a, highly regioselective benzofuran products 3l–n were
À
produced through the formation of C C bonds at the less-
hindered side of the phenol (Scheme 2). As expected, the
reaction of 2a with the structurally demanding ortho-sub-
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4607 –4612