Organic Letters
Letter
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions for the
Ni-Catalyzed Asymmetric Reductive Arylbenzylation
and both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups
were well tolerated (3ga and 3ha). Moreover, the highly
enantioselective construction of the dihydrobenzofuran (3ia
and 3ja) and indoline (3ka) framework turned out to be viable
using our method. However, only poor enantiocontrol could
be achieved for the synthesis of tetrahydroisoquinoline (3la).
In this case, the use of chiral BOX L4 as ligand also led to low
enantioselectivity. Subsequently, diverse substituted benzyl and
naphtyl chlorides 2b−r were reacted with the aryl iodide
appended alkene 1a. To our delight, all of the products 3ab−
aq were afforded in excellent enantioselectivities. Of note is
that both alkyl (3ag) and aryl chloride (3an) remained intact
in this Ni-catalyzed reaction. Furthermore, the electron-
deficient benzyl chloride 2q with higher propensity to undergo
homocoupling also turned out to be a competent precursor in
the studied reaction (3aq). Unfortunately, our method could
not allow the use of secondary benzyl chlorides as the coupling
partner in this arylbenzylation reaction. In the case of benzyl
chlorides containing an aryl bromide moiety, the reactions
compound 3aj (CCDC number: 1967238) was unambiguously
determined to be R through X-ray crystal structure analysis.
The stereochemistry of the other arylbenzylation products
were assigned by assuming an analogy reaction pathway.
To shed light on the mechanism of this Ni-catalyzed
asymmetric arylbenzylation, we performed a number of control
experiments. First, the tethered aryl halides were subjected to
a
b
c
entry
ligand
Ni precatalyst
solvent
yield (%)
ee (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L8
L8
L8
L8
L8
L8
L8
L8
L8
L8
Ni(BF ) ·6H O
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
NMP
DMF
DMA
DMA
DMA
0
0
4
2
2
Ni(BF ) ·6H O
4
2
2
Ni(BF ) ·6H O
34
52
58
65
69
66
56
88
84
91
80
93
38
52
53-
97
97
97
97
97
98
97
89
90
97
97
4
2
2
Ni(BF ) ·6H O
4
2
2
Ni(BF ) ·6H O
4
2
2
Ni(BF ) ·6H O
4
2
2
Ni(BF ) ·6H O
4
2
2
Ni(BF ) ·6H O
4
2
2
NiBr2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NiBr ·(dme)
2
NiCl ·(dme)
2
Ni(COD)2
the stoichiometric reaction with Ni(COD) in the presence of
2
d
NiBr ·diglyme
96 (94 )
2
the chiral ligand L8, followed by quenching with water (Table
3). In the case of the aryl iodide 1a, a high conversion was
achieved within 10 min wherein the 5-exo hydroarylation
product 4 and the dimerization product 5 were afforded in
45% and 42% yield, respectively (entry1). Notably, the
formation of 6-endo cyclization product 7 was not detected,
which is the major product in the stoichiometric reaction with
Ni(0) under the conditions of our previously reported
NiBr ·diglyme
78
33
58
45
31
2
NiBr ·diglyme
2
e
NiBr ·diglyme
2
f
NiBr ·diglyme
2
g
NiBr diglyme
2
a
Unless otherwise specified, reactions were performed on a 0.2 mmol
scale of aryl iodide 1a with 1.2 equiv of p-acetoxybenzyl chloride (2a),
1
0 mol % NiBr ·diglyme, 15 mol % ligand, and 2.0 equiv of Zn as
11
2
arylalkylation. This result suggests that this arylbenzylation
b
reductant in 0.5 mL of solvent at 40 °C for 16 h. GC yields using n-
dodecane as an internal standard. Determined by HPLC analysis on
chiral stationary phase. Yield of the isolated product. Mn was used
as the reductant instead of Zn. The bromo analogue of 1a was used
might proceed in a distinct reaction pathway. Furthermore, the
stoichiometric reaction using the corresponding aryl bromide
required a much longer reaction time to achieve a similar
conversion (entry 2). This reaction differentiating our aryl-
alkylation only in the ligand gave a different product profile
with compound 7 as a minor product (14% yield), suggesting
that the mode of the migratory insertion across the olefinic
unit is significantly influenced by the ligand. We also found
that the dimerization of benzyl chloride in the presence of
c
d
e
f
g
instead of 1a. p-Acetoxybenzyl bromide was used instead of 2a.
polar solvents such as NMP and DMF provided only inferior
results (entries 14 and 15). When Mn was used as reductant
instead of Zn, both efficiency and enantioselectivity diminished
(
entry 16). Finally, the influence of the leaving group on both
stoichiometric Ni(COD) could be complete within 10 min,
2
substrates was investigated. The use of a less reactive bromo
analogue of 1a as the coupling partner resulted in a much
lower yield (entry 17), and replacing the benzyl chloride 2a by
the corresponding more reactive benzyl bromide also
demonstrated significant detrimetal effect on the desired
reaction (entry 18). In these two cases, the homocoupling of
benzyl chloride or bromide turned out to be the major
reaction.
Under the optimal reaction conditions, we began to explore
the substrate spectrum of this Ni-catalyzed asymmetric
reductive arylbenzylation (Table 2). First, a panel of pendant
terminal alkenes 1a−f were subjected to the reaction with the
benzyl chloride 2a. Gratifying, all these reactions proceeded
smoothly, furnishing the corresponding products 3aa−fa in
high yields and enantiomeric excesses. We then studied the
electronic effect of the substitution on the tethered aryl ring,
indicating the match of the high reactivity of aryl iodide and
benzyl chloride toward Ni(0) is possibly the premise for their
efficient cross-coupling.
Next, the sequential stoichiometric reaction of 1a with
Ni(COD) and the benzyl chloride 2a was conducted in the
2
absence of the reducing agent (Scheme 2). The arylbenzylation
product 3aa was isolated in a moderate yield and slightly lower
enantioselectivity than the one of the catalytic reaction, while
the major byproduct in this sequential stoichiometric reaction
is the dimerization product 5. This result reveals that Zn could
serve as a terminal reductant in the catalytic cycle unlike our
5d,11
arylalkylation,
which require an intermediate reduction.
The difference regarding mechanism may lie in the distinct
propensity of the respective organohalides used in these
reactions to undergo reduction with low-valent Ni to generate
the corresponding radicals.
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX