Letter
a
Table 1. Reaction Condition Optimizations
Enantio-
meric
Excess, ee
(
%)
variation from the
standard conditions
(S)-
conversion,
selectivity
d
b
b
c
entry
1a
2a
C (%)
factor, s
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
None
97
13
76
30
52
96
89
99
31
78
3
93
20
72
17
59
85
90
84
68
73
14
60
92
51
39
51
64
47
53
50
54
32
51
17
51
51
116
1.7
14
1.8
6.4
48
A2 instead of A1
A3 instead of A1
A4 instead of A1
A5 instead of A1
A6 instead of A1
A7 instead of A1
A8 instead of A1
B1 instead of A1
DCM instead of Tol
56
69
7.2
15
1.4
7.5
101
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
Et O instead of Tol
2
e
CHCl instead of Tol
62
97
3
−60 °C instead of
Figure 1. Asymmetric halogenations of electron-rich arenes and
−
78 °C
kinetic resolution of hydroquinolines.
1
4
−40 °C instead of
99
89
52
78
−
78 °C
a
Reactions were run with 1a (0.1 mmol), NBS (0.06 mmol) with
CPA catalyst (0.005 mmol, 5 mol %) in solvents (5 mL) at designated
temperatures. Determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary
phase. Conversion (C) = ee /(ee + ee ). Selectivity factor (s) =
introduced hydrazine motif were relatively limited, which
could only be removed or converted to amino groups. Herein,
we report the first KR of 2,2-disubstituted hydroquinolines via
b
c
d
1
8
s
s
p
CPA catalyzed C6-selective asymmetric halogenations with
high stereoselectivities, which also represent the first
application of asymmetric electrophilic aromatic halogena-
e
ln[(1 − C)(1 − ee )]/ln[(1 − C)(1 + ee )]. At −60 °C.
s
s
1
9
tions of nonphenol-type substrates (Figure 1e).
With the optimal KR conditions in hand, we set out to
explore the scope of this reaction (Scheme 1). A series of para-
and meta-substituted phenyl groups at the 2-position of DHQs
were first studied, which were well-tolerated with the standard
conditions, giving s-factors up to 149 (1b−1g). The absolute
configurations of the bromination products were assigned by
analogy to (S)-2a, whose structure was unambiguously
determined by X-ray crystallography. Disubstituted phenyl
groups were also amenable to this KR reaction, albeit providing
slightly diminished KR performances (1h and 1i). Because of
the limitation of the protocol for the preparation of the racemic
substrates, the electron-deficient aryl-substituted dihydroqui-
nolines were not investigated under the standard conditions.
However, the tetrahydroquinolines bearing α-electron-defi-
cient aryl substitutions only afforded poor KR performances
under these conditions. Furthermore, the heteroaryl groups,
such as furan and thiophene, were compatible with the
standard conditions as well, which generated both recovered
DHQs and bromination products with high enantioselectivities
(1j and 1k). Note that no other brominated side products
occurring at the highly nucleophilic heteroaryl groups was
detected in these reactions. With the excellent compatibility of
the 2-aryl groups in these reactions, we turned our attention to
the 2-alkyl groups of DHQs. Switching the 2-Me group to a 2-
We started our studies by choosing racemic 2-methyl-2-
phenyl substituted dihydroquinoline (DHQ) 1a as model
substrate. After careful optimizations of the reaction con-
ditions, the optimal KR condition was determined. In the
20
presence of spirocyclic CPA A1 (5 mol %), treatment of
racemic 1a with NBS (0.6 equiv) in toluene at −78 °C for 24 h
afforded the recovered (R)-1a with 97% ee and the C-6
brominated product (S)-2a with 93% ee, corresponding to a
2
2
2
1
selectivity factor (s) of 116 (Table 1, entry 1). Note that the
bromination reaction proceeded with excellent regioselectivity,
and no C-8 brominated DHQ was observed. Variation of the
CPA catalysts was studied (Table 1, entries 2−8), which
suggested that only sterically hindered catalysts provided
decent KR performances (Table 1, entries 6−8). Switching the
chiral scaffold of CPA A1 from SPINOL-type to BINOL-type
led to significant diminishment of the selectivity factor (Table
1
, entry 9), which suggested the critical role of the chiral
spirocyclic scaffold of the catalyst. However, a series of solvents
were also screened at low temperatures, which afforded poor
KR performances (Table 1, entries 10−12). The reaction
temperature was also evaluated, which indicated that −78 °C
was optimal and increases in the reaction temperature led to
erosion of the selectivity factors (Table 1, entries 13−14).
4
105
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 4104−4108