5226
J. Liddle et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 5222–5226
with several analogues. For example, the lipophilic (clog P 3.1)
gem-dimethyl analogue 18 maintained low rat in vivo clearance
(14 mL/min/kg), typical of the majority of 2-cyclopropyl analogues,
and a high bioavailability of approximately 100%. The correspond-
ing 2-methyl analogue 19 had high in vivo clearance (70 mL/min/
kg), and a moderate bioavailability of 32%. The homochiral ana-
logues 20 and 21 also had attractive in vitro profiles. However,
20 had poor oral bioavailability of 29% in the rat. 21 had excellent
bioavailability of 83% in the rat when dosed at 1 mg/kg but suffered
from poor aqueous solubility compared to other analogues. Such
low solubility is likely to preclude achieving sufficiently high sys-
temic concentrations required for in vivo toxicity evaluation.
Compound 16 had the preferred overall profile including low
molecular weight (357), optimal log P (2.4), good solubility and a
free fraction of approximately 7% in human blood (Table 6). Fur-
References and notes
1. Barnes, P. J.; Karin, M. N. Eng. J. Med. 1997, 336, 1066.
2. Li, Q.; Verma, I. M. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 725.
3. Karin, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Wang, Q. M. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2004, 3, 17.
4. Hayden, M. S.; Ghosh, S. Gen. Dev. 2004, 18, 2195.
5. Yamamoto, Y.; Gaynor, R. B. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2004, 29, 72.
6. Li, J.; Peet, G. W.; Pullen, S. S. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 30736.
7. Hu, Y.; Baud, V.; Delhase, M. Science 1999, 284, 316.
8. Strnad, J.; Burke, J. R. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2007, 28, 142.
9. Prajapati, S.; Tu, Z.; Yamamoto, Y.; Gaynor, R. B. Cell Cycle 2006, 5, 2371.
10. Lawrence, T.; Bebien, M.; Liu, G. Y.; Nizet, V.; Karin, M. Nature 2005, 434, 1138.
11. Bamborough, P.; Callahan, J. F.; Christopher, J. A.; Kerns, J. K.; Liddle, J.; Miller,
D. D.; Morse, M. A.; Rumsey, W. L.; Williamson, R. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2009, 9,
623.
12. Liddle, J.; Bamborough, P.; Barker, M. D.; Campos, S.; Cousins, R. P. C.; Cutler, G.
J.; Hobbs, H.; Holmes, D. S.; Ioannou, C.; Mellor, G. W.; Morse, M. A.; Payne, J. J.;
Pritchard, J. M.; Smith, K. J.; Tape, D. T.; Whitworth, C.; Williamson, R. A. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 2504.
13. The IKK2 enzyme assay, NF-jB cellular mechanistic assay, human whole blood
thermore, 16 had an acceptable P450 profile (2C9 IC50 = 7
lM,
assay and azaindole syntheses are described in WO2008/034860.
14. A homology model of IKK2 was built as previously described: Christopher, J. A.;
Avitabile, B. G.; Bamborough, P.; Champigny, A. C.; Cutler, G. J.; Dyos, S. L.;
Grace, K. G.; Kerns, J. K.; Kitson, J. D.; Mellor, G. W.; Morey, J. V.; Morse, M. A.;
O’Malley, C. F.; Patel, C. B.; Probst, N.; Rumsey, W.; Smith, C. A.; Wilson, M. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 3972.
other isoforms IC50 >10 M) with no evidence of time dependent
l
inhibition at CYP3A4 and 2D6. Importantly, 16 had low intrinsic
clearance when incubated with human hepatocytes.
Compound 16 also had excellent kinase selectivity. When
screened against over 60 in-house kinases (including ROCK, JNK1,
Aurora A and B), only IKK1 inhibition was within 30 fold of IKK2
inhibition (fold selectivity based on comparative IC50 values).
The in vivo efficacy of 16 was evaluated in a rat model of
neutrophil activation, a standard animal model of inflammation.
15. E. coli expressed GST-tagged truncated human Jnk1alpha (1-364) was purified
to homogeneity as detailed in Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 360. The
protein–ligand complex, concentrated to between ꢀ8–11 mg/ml in 50 mM Tris
pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT, was crystallized against a well solution
consisting of 0.05 M ammonium sulfate, 0.05 bis-Tris pH 6.5, 30% v/v
Pentaerythritol (15/4 EO/OH). Crystals were improved by use of seeding.
Data from a single frozen crystal was collected at the European Synchrotron
Radiation Facility, Grenoble and processed using MOSFLM and scaled using
SCALA to give a 1.90 Å dataset. The P212121 cell (a = 50.438 Å, b = 72.747 Å,
c = 110.155 Å, a = b = g = 90°) has a single molecule in the ASU. After rigid body
refinement using a previously determined in house structure, model building
was performed using Coot and refined using REFMAC. There was clear
difference density for the ligand in the ATP binding site and the binding
mode could be unambiguously determined. The final model (R/Rfree = 18.8/
21.9%) has been deposited in the protein databank under the accession codes
4awi.pdb.
16 was dosed orally at 10, 30 and 100 lmol/kg to male rats
30 min prior to the rats being exposed to aeorosolised LPS.16 16
was found to inhibit neutrophil lung infiltration in a dose depen-
dent manner giving approximately 50% reduction with a corre-
sponding plasma concentration of approximately 2
lM (Fig. 2).
At 30 mol/kg po (equivalent to approximately 11 mg/kg), there
l
was a significant reduction in neutrophil infiltration as compared
to those animals receiving the vehicle.17 This data is consistent
16. Compound 16 was dissolved in 2% DMSO with 0.5% methylcellulose for a final
with the potency value obtained using the rat LPS/TNFa cellular as-
say (pIC50 = 5.2)
concentration of 10
assist in solubilisation. Dilutions were made with 0.5% methylcellulose to
obtain concentrations of 3 and 1 mol/ml. Male Lewis rats were dosed orally at
a volume of 10 ml/kg 30 min prior to LPS aerosol. Final doses were 10, 30 and
100 mol/kg. Each group, including vehicle, was n = 4. Thirty minutes
following the compound dose, the rats were exposed to aerosolized 0.1 mg/
ml LPS solution from E. coli, serotype 026:B6 (Sigma, St. Louis) at a rate of 4.5 L/
min for 20 min. At 4 h-post LPS exposure the rats were euthanized by Fatal Plus
i.p. (100 mg/kg). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed through a 14
gauge blunt needle inserted into the exposed trachea in five, 5 ml washes of
Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) to collect a total of 20–23 ml of
BAL fluid. Blood was taken via cardiac puncture for DMPK analysis. BAL fluid
was centrifuged at 1000–1500 rpm for 10 min. Supernatant was aspirated and
lmol/kg (3.57 mg/ml). 200 ll 1 N NaOH was added to
l
The compounds described in this paper were prepared by previ-
ously reported chemistry.13 Analogues were generally prepared via
a divergent route involving a final Suzuki reaction coupling the
azaindole core to the phenylsulphonamide moiety. The synthetic
route to 16 is shown in Scheme 1. An initial lithiation of a Boc-
protected 2-amino-3-methyl pyridine and condensation with
N-methoxy-N-methylcyclopropanecarboxamide furnished the
cyclopropyl-azaindole 23. Oxidation of the azaindole followed by
addition of methane sulphonyl chloride yielded the 4-chloroazain-
dole 25. Routine chemistry furnished the borane ester 28 and sub-
sequent Suzuki reaction gave 16 in 60% yield.
In summary, we have presented the lead optimisation of a ser-
ies of potent and selective azaindole IKK2 inhibitors. The medicinal
chemistry strategy was focussed on maintaining the excellent
physicochemical properties of the lead 1 whilst optimising the
whole blood activity and rodent pharmacokinetics; this led to
the discovery of 16 which had an excellent physicochemical and
in vitro profile. Furthermore, 16 had good rat pharmacokinetics
and demonstrated in vivo efficacy in a rat model of neutrophil
activation.
l
discarded. Cell pellet was resuspended in 5 ml PBS. An aliquot of 70–100 ll
was centrifuged on a Shandon cytospin at 300 rpm for 5 min. Slides were
stained with Diff-Quick (a Wright-Giemsa stain) for differential cell counts.
Total cell counts were performed with
calculated as inhibition of each dose as compared to vehicle-treated
animals and and ED50 was calculated of 28.2 mol/kg (10.1 mg/kg). Plasma
a haemocytometer. Data were
%
l
concentrations at 4.5 h post-compound administration were determined.
17. Statistical analysis using Anova followed by Post Hoc Dunnett’s test confirmed
that the 30 lmol/kg dose led to significant inhibition compared to control.
The human biological samples were sourced ethically and their research use
was in accord with the terms of the informed consents.
All animal studies were ethically reviewed and carried out in accordance with
animals (scientific procedures) Act 1986 and the GSK Policy on the Care,
Welfare and Treatment of Animals.