2024 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, Vol. 51, No. 7
Sánchez-del-Campo et al.
3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl chloride 4 (0.386 g, 1.68 mmol) in the
same solvent was added dropwise under nitrogen. The reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h, and then a solution
of saturated sodium bicarbonate (30 mL) and ethyl acetate (50 mL)
was added. Afterward, the mixture was extracted twice with water
(2 × 100 mL). The organic layers were dried with anhydrous
magnesium sulfate, and the solvent was removed under vacuum.
The resulting red oil was chromatographed on a silica gel column
using n-Hex/AcOEt (6:4, v/v) as solvent (Rf ) 0.64). The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure, and the solid was recrystal-
lized from Et2O/n-Hex to obtain a white solid (yield ) 71%). MS
antibiotics, under standard tissue culture conditions. Cell injury was
evaluated by a colorimetric assay for mitochondrial function using
the MTT cell proliferation assay.43 The assay is based on the ability
of a mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzyme from viable cells to
cleave the tetrazolium rings of the pale-yellow MTT and to form
dark-blue formazan crystals, which cannot pass through cell
membranes, and thus, they accumulated within healthy cells. The
number of surviving cells is directly proportional to the level of
the formazan product created, and the color can then be quantified
at 570 nm. For this assay, cells were plated in a 96-well plate at a
density of 1000 cells/well and grown until they reached 50–60%
confluence. Human epidermal melanocytes (HeM) were supplied
by Gentaur (Brussels, Belgium) and were cultured in HAM-F10
medium supplemented with 10% FCS, antibiotics and the human
melanocyte growth supplement (Gentaur).
Stability and Cellular Uptake of Catechins. Stability and
cellular uptake were determined by the difference between the initial
concentration of catechin and that calculated at specific times in
the cellular medium and expressed as a percentage of catechin at
zero time. Catechin concentrations were determined by HPLC
analysis. Briefly, a total of 50 µL of cellular medium was injected
into a HPLC system (Hitachi, LaChrom Elite) equipped with a 250
mm × 4.6 mm C18 column and a UV–vis detector. The mobile
phase was 0.1 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 2.5)
containing 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt
(Na2EDTA)/acetonitrile (87/13 v/v), and the flow rate was 1 mL/
min. The column was maintained at 30 °C. Catechins were identified
by their characteristic elution times, and their concentrations were
calculated with respect to calibration curves for known concentra-
tions of catechins.
1
(FAB+) m/z (%) 845 (M+ + 1, 10). H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz)
δ 7.30–7.43 (m, 20H, Ph), 7.17 (s, 2H, H2′′ and H6′′), 7.13 (d,
4
3
4
1H, J ) 1.9 Hz, H2′), 7.07 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.4 Hz, J ) 1.9 Hz,
3
4
H6′), 6.89 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4 Hz, H5′), 6.30 (d, 1H, J ) 2.2 Hz,
H6), 6.28 (d, 1H, 4J ) 2.2 Hz, H8), 5.11 (s, 4H, 2 × CH2O), 5.03
3
(s, 2H, CH2O), 5.02 (s, 2H, CH2O), 4.97 (d, 1H, J ) 11.7 Hz,
H2), 4.87 (d, 1H, 3J ) 11.7 Hz, H3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.80 (s,
6H, OCH3), 3.10 (m, 2H, H4). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ
164.9 (q, -COO), 158.4 (q, Ar-O), 157.6 (q, Ar-O), 155.2 (q,
Ar-O), 152.5 (2 × q, Ar-O), 148.6 (q, Ar-O), 142.0 (q, Ar-O),
136.8 (q, PhCH2), 136.7 (q, PhCH2), 136.5 (q, PhCH2), 136.4 (q,
PhCH2), 130.8 (q, C1′), 128.3 (CH, PhCH2), 128.2 (CH, PhCH2),
128.1(CH, PhCH2), 128.0 (CH, PhCH2), 127.6 (CH, PhCH2), 127.5
(CH, PhCH2), 127.4 (2 × CH, PhCH2), 127.1 (CH, PhCH2), 127.0
(CH, PhCH2), 126.9 (CH, PhCH2), 126.8 (CH, PhCH2), 124.7 (q,
C1′′), 119.6 (CH, C6′), 114.4 (CH, C6), 113.6 (CH, C2′), 106.7
(CH, C2′′ y C6′′), 100.5 (q, C4a), 94.2 (CH, C6), 93.5 (CH, C8),
71.2 (CH2, CH2Ph), 70.9 (CH2, CH2Ph), 69.8 (CH2, CH2Ph), 69.6
(CH2, CH2Ph), 68.5 (CH, C3), 60.5 (CH3, OCH3), 55.8 (CH3,
OCH3), 25.5 (CH2, C4). Anal. Calcd for C53H48O10: C, 75.34; H,
5.73. Found: C, 75.57; H, 5.94.
Antioxidant Activity. The antioxidant capacity was measured
using a method based on the abilities of different substances to
scavenge the ABTS·+ radical cation compared with a standard
antioxidant (Trolox) in a dose–response curve.36 ABTS·+ radical
cation was prepared by oxidation of ABTS (150 µM) in the presence
of H2O2 (75 µM) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (0.25 µM) in
citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 4.5. This solution was then diluted
in 5 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, to an absorbance
of 0.70 ((0.02) at 734 nm and preincubated at 30 °C prior to use.
Fresh ABTS·+ radical cation solution was prepared each day.
Trolox (2.5 mM) was prepared in PBS for use as stock standard.
Fresh working standards were prepared daily by diluting 2.5 mM
Trolox with PBS. All catechins were dissolved in PBS to a
concentration of 50 µM. After addition of 1 mL of ABTS•+ solution
to aliquots of Trolox or catechins (1–100 µL, depending on the
activity of the particular compound) the solutions were vortexed
for exactly 30 s and the absorbance at 734 nm was taken exactly
1 min after initiation of mixing in a Perkin-Elmer Lambda-35
spectrophotometer. PBS blanks were run in each assay. The
dose–response curve for Trolox consisted of plotting the absorbance
at 734 nm as a percentage of the absorbance of the uninhibited
radical cation and was based on triplicate determinations. The
activities of catechins were assayed at four different concentrations
previously determined to be within the range of the dose–response
curve. All the measurements were repeated on triplicate samples
at these four concentrations. By reference to the Trolox dose–re-
sponse curve, the mean Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity
(TEAC) value was derived for each catechin compound.
3-O-(3, 4, 5-Trimethoxybenzoyl)-(-)-epicatechin, 6. Under
normal pressure, a solution of 5 (0.600 g, 0.71 mmol) and 10%
Pd/C (0.06 g of palladium, 0.56 mmol) in THF/MeOH (1:1, 40
mL) was treated with molecular hydrogen. The solution was stirred
for 18 h at room temperature and then filtered on a Celite pad,
which was then washed with methanol (300 mL). The solvent was
removed under vacuum, and the resulting solid was recrystallized
from Et2O (yield ) 62%). MS (FAB+) m/z (%) 485 (M+ + 1, 28).
1H NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz) δ 8.31 (bs, 1H, OH), 8.10 (bs,
1H, OH), 7.94 (bs, 1H, OH), 7.80 (bs, 1H, OH), 7.14 (s, 2H, H2′′
4
3
and H6′′), 7.11 (d, 1H, J ) 2.0 Hz, H2′), 6.90 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.2
Hz, 4J ) 2 Hz, H6′), 6.79 (d, 1H, 3J ) 8.2 Hz, H5′), 6.03 (d, 1H,
4
4J ) 2.2 Hz, H6), 6.02 (d, 1H, J ) 2.2 Hz, H8), 5.48 (m, 1H,
H3), 5.19 (bs, 1H, H2), 3.80 (s, 6H, OCH3), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH3),
3.10 (m, 1H, Hgem, H4), 3.05 (m, 1H, Hgem, H4). 13C NMR
(acetone-d6, 100 MHz) δ 165.9 (q, -COO), 157.9 (q, Ar-O), 157.4
(q, Ar-O), 156.8 (q, Ar-O), 154.0 (q, Ar-O), 145.7 (q, Ar-O),
145.4 (q, Ar-O), 143.3 (q, Ar-O), 131.4 (q, C1′), 126.2 (q, C1′′),
118.7 (CH, C6′), 115.6 (CH, C5′), 114.6 (CH, C2′), 107.6 (CH,
C2′′ and C6′′), 98.5 (q, C4a), 96.4 (CH, C7), 95.5 (CH, C9), 77.7
(CH, C2), 70.7 (CH, C3), 60.6 (CH3, CH3O), 56.4 (CH3, CH3O),
26.0 (CH2, C4). Anal. Calcd for C25H24O10: C, 61.98; H, 4.99.
Found: C, 61.69; H, 5.24.
Materials. Highly purified tea polyphenols, EGCG (>95%),
ECG (>98%), EGC (>98%) EC (>98%), and (-)-catechin (>98%)
were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (Madrid, Spain).
rHDHFR was purchased from Sigma and dialyzed exhaustively
against distilled water prior to use. The enzyme concentration was
determined by MTX titration of enzyme fluorescence.41 DHF (90%)
was obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Madrid, Spain) and
NADPH from Sigma. The concentrations of NADPH and DHF
were determined enzymically at 340 nm using DHFR and a molar
absorbance change (∆ꢀ) of 11 800 M-1 cm-1 for the reaction at
this wavelength.42 SOD from bovine liver was obtained from Sigma
and used without further purification.
NADPH Oxidation by Catechins. NADPH oxidation in the
presence of catechins was determined by following the decrease
in absorbance of NADPH at 340 nm in a Perkin-Elmer Lambda-
35 spectrophotometer.
DHFR Assays. The activity of DHFR in the absence or presence
of catechins was determined at 25 °C by following the decrease in
the absorbance of NADPH and DHF at 340 nm. Experiments were
performed in a buffer containing 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic
acid (Mes, 0.025 M), sodium acetate (0.025 M), tris(hydroxy-
methyl)aminomethane (Tris 0.05 M), and NaCl (0.1 M) at pH 7.4.
To prevent the oxidation of catechins, the reaction mixture contained
Cell Cultures. Human cancer cells lines (SkMel-28, MCF7,
H1264, and Caco-2) were obtained from the American Type Tissue
Culture Collection (ATCC) and were maintained in appropriate
culture media supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and