S. Lee et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 684–687
687
Table 2
Recycling of the CNT-supported Ru catalyst 4a after RCM of 5a in CH2Cl2 and [bmim][PF6]a
Sol/run
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CH2Cl2
>99
>99c
1
>99
57
1
>99
—
1
>99
—
1
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
96
Conv.b (%)
Time (h)
1
1
1
1
1.5
96
2
[bmim][PF6]/CH2Cl2
Conv.b (%)
Time (h)
>99
>99c
1
>99
95
1
>99
86
1
>99
40
1
>99
>99
>99
>99
94
1
1
1
1
1
1
a
b
c
Reactions were carried out with diene 5a (0.1 mmol) with 2.5 mol % 4a (based on Ru contents) at 40 °C in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) or CH2Cl2/[bmim][PF6] (1:1 v/v, 2.0 mL).
Determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Reaction was carried out in the presence of N-butylimidazolium bromide-functionalized MWCNTs and 2.5 mol % Grubbs–Hoveyda catalyst instead of the supported
catalyst 4a.
626; American Chemical Society: Washinton, DC, 1996.; (b)Green Chemistry:
Theory and Practice, Anastas, P. T., Warner, J., Eds.; Oxford University Press:
New York, 1998; (c) Blaser, H.-U.; Pugin, B. In Supported Reagents and Catalysts
in Chemistry; Hodnett, B. K., Kybett, A. P., Clark, J. H., Smith, K., Eds.; RSC:
Cambridge, UK, 1998; Vol. 216, p 101; (d)Green Chemistry: Frontie in Benign
Chemical Syntheses and Processes; Anastas, P. T., Williamson, T. C., Eds.; Oxford
University Press: New York, 1999.
loss of catalytic activity. The ICP-MS analysis of the extracts from
the first three runs indicated that approximately 100 ppm of Ru
species leached out from each run. When the catalyst was recov-
ered by filtration, leaching of Ru increased as the catalytically
active Ru-species were not completely returned to the resting
pre-catalyst form. Taking the advantage of high-dispersity of the
IM-f-MWCNT-supported Ru catalyst 4a in an ionic liquid,
[bmim][PF6] (b in Fig. 1F), we examined recyclability of 4a in an io-
nic liquid. The RCM of 5a, conducted in a mixture of [bmim][PF6]/
CH2Cl2 (1/1, v/v) in the presence of 2.5 mol % of 4a, was completed
within 1 h. After evaporation of CH2Cl2, the product was extracted
with diethyl ether, and the catalyst immobilized in [bmim][PF6]
was reused for the next run, allowing 10 times of reuse without
a significant loss of catalytic activity. As control experiments for
catalyst recycling, the RCMs of 4a with homogeneous Grubbs–
Hoveyda Ru-catalyst, in the presence of N-butylimidazolium bro-
mide-functionalized MWCNTs, were carried out. It has been found
that the conversion was dramatically decreased upon recycling of
the catalyst, suggesting significant amounts of Ru-catalysts were
leached out during the extraction of product with ethyl ether.
These results further confirmed the fact that the covalent immobi-
lization of Ru-catalysts onto the support material could be one of
the effective ways to recover and reuse of the Ru-catalyst.
In summary, the Hoveyda-type Ru–carbene complex was
immobilized successfully onto the imidazolium salt-functionalized
ionic MWCNTs. The ionic CNT-supported Ru–carbene complexes
showed high dispersity in methylene chloride and ionic liquid en-
abling the RCMs of various dienes in both methylene chloride and
ionic liquid solvents with excellent catalytic activity and recycla-
bility. Studies on further applications of the ionic CNTs as support
materials for other organometallic catalysts are currently
underway.
2. (a) Wildgoose, G. G.; Banks, C. E.; Compton, R. G. Small 2006, 2, 182–193; (b)
Georgakilas, V.; Gournis, D.; Tzitzios, V.; Pasquato, L.; Guldi, D. M.; Prato, M. J.
Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 2679–2694; (c) Srivastava, S.; Kotov, N. A. Acc. Chem. Res.
2008, 41, 1831–1841; (d) Peng, X.; Chen, J.; Misewich, J. A.; Wong, S. S. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1076–1098; (e) Capek, I. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 150,
63–89; (f) Guerra, J.; Herrero, M. A. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 1390–1400; (g)
Kauffman, D. R.; Sorescu, D. C.; Schofield, D. P.; Allen, B. L.; Jordan, K. D.; Star, A.
Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 958–963; (h) Willner, I.; Willner, B. Nano Lett. 2010, 10,
3805–3815; (i) Wu, B.; Kuang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J. Nano Today 2011, 6, 75–90.
3. (a) Baleizao, C.; Gigante, B.; Garcia, H.; Corma, A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 10461;
(b) Xing, L.; Xie, J.-H.; Chen, Y.-S.; Wang, L.-X.; Zhou, Q.-L. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2008, 350, 1013–1016.
4. Reviews, see: (a) Lee, S.-g. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1049–1063; (b) Lee, S.-g.;
Zhang, Y. J. Enantioselective Catalysis in Ionic Liquid and Supercritical CO2. In
Handbook of Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis; Ding, K., Uozumi, Y., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; pp 233–292. Chapter 8; (c) Lee, J. W.;
Shin, J. Y.; Chun, Y. S.; Jang, H. B.; Song, C. E.; Lee, S.-g. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43,
985–994.
5. (a) Lee, B. S.; Chi, Y. S.; Lee, J. K.; Choi, I. S.; Song, C. E.; Namgoong, S. K.; Lee, S.-g.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 480–481; (b) Chi, Y. S.; Lee, J. K.; Lee, S.-g.; V, I. S.
Langmuir 2004, 20, 3024–3027; (c) Chi, Y. S.; Hwang, S.; Lee, B. S.; Kwak, J.;
Choi, I. S.; Lee, S.-g. Langmuir 2005, 21, 4268–4271; (d) Park, M. J.; Lee, J. K.; Lee,
B. K.; Lee, Y.-W.; Choi, I. S.; Lee, S.-g. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1546–1551; (e)
Shin, J. Y.; Lee, B. S.; Jung, Y.; Kim, S. J.; Lee, S.-g. Chem. Commun. 2007, 5238–
5240; (f) Chun, Y. S.; Shin, J. Y.; Song, C. E.; Lee, S.-g. Chem. Commun. 2008,
942–944; (g) Park, C.-L.; Jee, A. Y.; Lee, M.; Lee, S.-g. Chem. Commun. 2009,
5576–5578; (h) Shin, J. Y.; Kim, Y. S.; Lee, Y.; Shim, J. H.; Lee, C.; Lee, S.-g. Chem.
Asian J. 2011, 6, 2016–2021; (i) Kim, Y. S.; Cha, A.; Shin, J. Y.; Jeon, H. J.; Shim, J.
H.; Lee, C.; Lee, S.-g. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8940–8942.
6. Selected reviews on olefin metathesis, see (a) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 18–29; (b) Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2003, 42, 4592–4633; (c) Grubbs, R. H. Handbook of Metathesis; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2003; (d) Connon, S. J.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
1900–1923; (e) Astruc, A. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 42–56.
7. Our efforts on supported metathesis catalysts. See: (a) Lee, B. S.; Namgoong, S.
K.; Lee, S.-g. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4501–4503; (b) Chen, S.-W.; Kim, J. H.;
Song, C. E.; Lee, S.-g. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3845–3848; (c) Chen, S.-W.; Kim, J. H.;
Shin, H.; Lee, S.-g. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2676–2678; (d) Chen, S.-W.; Kim,
J. H.; Ryu, K. Y.; Lee, W.-W.; Hong, J.; Lee, S.-g. Tetrahedron 2009, 17, 3397–
3403.
8. Review on supported Ru-catalysts, see (a) Clavier, H.; Grela, K.; Kirschning, A.;
Mauduit, M.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6786–6801; (b)
Copéret, C.; Basset, J. M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 78–92.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation
(NRF-20120005673 and SRC Program 2012-0000648).
9. (a) Gatti, M.; Vieille-Petit, L.; Luan, X.; Mariz, R.; Drinkel, E.; Linden, A.; Dorta, R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9498–9499; (b) Kuhn, K. M.; Bourg, J.-B.; Chung, C.
K.; Virgil, S. C.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5213–5320; (c) Vorfalt,
T.; Wannowius, K.-J.; Plenio, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5533–5536.
10. (a) Gomez, F. J.; Chen, R. J.; Wang, D.; Waymouth, R. M.; Dai, H. Chem. Commun.
2003, 190–191; (b) Liu, Y.; Adronov, A. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 4755–4760;
(c) Liu, G.; Wu, B.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Shao, M.; Wang, J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48,
2383–2390.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
11. Park, K. C.; Jang, I. Y.; Wongwiriyapan, W.; Morimoto, S.; Kim, Y. J.; Jung, Y. C.;
Toya, T.; Endo, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 5345.
References and notes
1. (a) For selected recent reviews and monographs on green chemistry, see: Green
Chemistry: Designing Chemistry for the Environment, ACS Symposium Series No.