ChemComm
Communication
catalytic studies: In a typical experiment 1 mmol ethyl acetoacetate,
1 mmol amine and 0.05 mmol A1 were stirred at room temperature for
appropriate time. At the end of the reaction, 10 mL of distilled water was
added to the residue. After the catalyst was filtered off, the filtrate was
extracted with ethyl acetate (3 ꢂ 10 mL). The organic layer was dried over
MgSO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure; pure
b-enaminoester was obtained by column chromatography over the silica
gel using hexane/ethyl acetate as an eluent. All isolated pure products
were fully characterized by 1H and 13C NMR or otherwise compared with
the known compounds. The recovered catalyst was washed with ethyl
acetate, dried, and reused without further purification or regeneration.
Moreover, the recovered catalysts were characterized by powder X-ray
diffraction and showed identical results to those of the fresh samples.
15 min reaction time and stirring of the filtrate continued under the
same conditions. The result confirms the assumption of a hetero-
geneous mechanism since neither additional ethyl acetoacetate is
consumed nor the product is formed after filtration. A plausible
mechanism of enamination of b-ketoester reactions is that
unsaturated Cu(II) acts as a Lewis acid active site.5 Finally, for
a more comprehensive study of the catalytic activity of A1 in the
condensation of b-ketoesters with primary amines, a recycling
test with three consecutive runs was performed (see the experi-
mental section). As mentioned before, a product yield of 97% is
achieved in the first run after 0.5 h. In the second and the third
run the product yields, determined after the same reaction time
(0.5 h), decrease to 95% and 93%, respectively. The PXRD
patterns of the recovered A1 suggest that its structure is well
maintained after several cycles of reactions (see Fig. S4, ESI†).
In summary, we have reported a pertinent method for
preparation of b-enaminoesters by condensation of b-ketoesters with
primary amines under solvent-free conditions at room temperature
with A1 as a novel heterogeneous catalyst. Compared with the
reported homogeneous catalysts for the condensation reaction, A1
has some fascinating features because of its low environmental
impact, recovery and reusability, and high chemo-selectivity. To
our knowledge, this is the first report on selective enamination of
b-ketoesters performed using Cu(II) with unsaturated coordination
spheres as active sites.
1 (a) L. Ma, C. Abney and W. Lin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1248–1256;
(b) J. Kim and M. Movassaghi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 3035–3050;
(c) F. Song, C. Wang, J. M. Falkowski, L. Ma and W. Lin, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 15390–15398; (d) L.-X. Shi and C.-D. Wu, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 2928–2930; (e) X. Jing, C. He, D. Dong, L. Yang
and C. Duan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 10127–10131;
( f ) Y.-X. Tan, Y.-P. He and J. Zhang, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24,
4711–4716; (g) H.-X. Li, W. Zhao, H.-Y. Li, Z.-L. Xu, W.-X. Wang and
J.-P. Lang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4259–4261.
2 (a) M. Banerjee, S. Das, M. Yoon, H. J. Choi, M. H. Hyun, S. M. Park,
G. Seo and K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 7524–7525;
(b) S. Horike, M. Dinca, K. Tamaki and J. R. Long, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 5854–5855; (c) Z. Xu, Q. Wang, H. Li, W. Meng, Y. Han,
H. Hou and Y. Fan, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 5736–5738; (d) M. Yoon,
R. Srirambalaji and K. Kim, Chem. Rev., 2011, 112, 1196–1231.
3 (a) H. R. Moon, N. Kobayashi and M. P. Suh, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45,
8672–8676; (b) B. Chen, M. Eddaoudi, T. M. Reineke, J. W. Kampf,
M. O’Keeffe and O. M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
11559–11560; (c) S. Kitagawa, S.-i. Noro and T. Nakamura, Chem.
Commun., 2006, 701–707; (d) A. Dhakshinamoorthy, M. Alvaro and
H. Garcia, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 8530–8536; (e) A. Corma,
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (21073082, 21271098 and 21272109), and
sponsored by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in
University (NCET-11-0947), Innovation Scientists and Technicians
Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province (134100510011)
and the Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in
Universities of Henan Province (2011HASTIT027).
´
´
M. Iglesias, F. X. Llabres i Xamena and F. Sanchez, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2010, 16, 9789–9795; ( f ) J. Kim, S. Bhattacharjee, K.-E. Jeong,
S.-Y. Jeong and W.-S. Ahn, Chem. Commun., 2009, 3904–3906;
(g) D. Sarma, K. Ramanujachary, N. Stock and S. Natarajan, Cryst.
Growth Des., 2011, 11, 1357–1369; (h) D. Shi, Y. Ren, H. Jiang, J. Lu
and X. Cheng, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 484–491.
4 M. A. Halcrow, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 1784–1795.
5 (a) J. Park, J.-R. Li, Y.-P. Chen, J. Yu, A. A. Yakovenko, Z. U. Wang,
L.-B. Sun, P. B. Balbuena and H.-C. Zhou, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48,
9995–9997; (b) S.-K. Yoo, J. Y. Ryu, J. Y. Lee, C. Kim, S.-J. Kim and
Y. Kim, Dalton Trans., 2003, 1454–1456; (c) D. A. Evans, S. J. Miller,
T. Lectka and P. von Matt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 7559–7573;
(d) Y. Gong, T. Wu, P. G. Jiang, J. H. Lin and Y. X. Yang, Inorg. Chem.,
2012, 52, 777–784; (e) D. Jiang, T. Mallat, F. Krumeich and A. Baiker,
J. Catal., 2008, 257, 390–395; ( f ) I. H. Hwang, J. M. Bae, W.-S. Kim,
Y. D. Jo, C. Kim, Y. Kim, S.-J. Kim and S. Huh, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41,
12759–12765.
6 A.-Z. A. Elassar and A. A. El-Khair, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 8463–8480.
7 (a) N. N. Salama, K. R. Scott and N. D. Eddington, Biopharm. Drug
Dispos., 2004, 25, 227–236; (b) N. D. Eddington, D. S. Cox,
M. Khurana, N. N. Salama, J. P. Stables, S. J. Harrison, A. Negussie,
R. S. Taylor, U. Q. Tran, J. A. Moore, J. C. Barrow and K. R. Scott, Eur. J.
Med. Chem., 2003, 38, 49–64; (c) A. P. Marcus and R. Sarpong, Org.
Lett., 2010, 12, 4560–4563.
8 (a) A. R. Katritzky, A. E. Hayden, K. Kirichenko, P. Pelphrey and Y. Ji,
J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 5108–5111; (b) D. S. Reddy, T. V. Rajale,
K. Shivakumar and J. Iqbal, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 979–982.
9 (a) Z.-H. Zhang, L. Yin and Y.-M. Wang, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006, 348,
184–190; (b) J. S. Yadav, V. N. Kumar, R. S. Rao, A. D. Priyadarshini,
P. P. Rao, B. V. S. Reddy and K. Nagaiah, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2006, 256,
234–237; (c) R. K. Vohra, J.-L. Renaud and C. Bruneau, Collect. Czech.
Chem. Commun., 2005, 70, 1943–1952; (d) Y. Zhao, J. Zhao, Y. Zhou, Z. Lei,
L. Li and H. Zhang, New J. Chem., 2005, 29, 769–772; (e) A. Arcadi,
G. Bianchi, S. D. Giuseppe and F. Marinelli, Green Chem., 2003, 5, 64–67;
( f ) Z.-H. Zhang, T.-S. Li and J.-J. Li, Catal. Commun., 2007, 8, 1615–1620;
(g) M. A. Harrad, R. Outtouch, M. Ait Ali, L. E. Firdoussi, A. Karim and
A. Roucoux, Catal. Commun., 2010, 11, 442–446.
Notes and references
‡ Synthesis of A1: [Cu(Hnbta)(1,3-btp)]ꢀ2H2O. A mixture of H3nbta
(0.1 mmol, 25.5 mg), 1,3-btp (0.1 mmol, 17.8 mg), Cu(OAc)2ꢀH2O
(0.1 mmol, 19.8 mg) and H2O 12 mL was placed in a Teflon-lined
stainless steel vessel, heated to 130 1C for 3 days, and then cooled to
room temperature for over 24 h. Blue block crystals of A1 were obtained.
Yield: 18.5 mg, 51% (based on Cu). Elemental analysis (%): calcd for
C16H17CuN7O10 C 36.20, H 3.23, N 18.47; found C 36.29, H 3.15, N 18.40.
IR (cmꢁ1): 3118 m, 1723 s, 1574 s, 1537 s, 1432 m, 1338 s, 1132 m,
995 m, 734 s, 665 m.
§ Crystal data for A1: C16H17CuN7O10, M = 530.91, orthorhombic, space
group P212121, a = 5.7467(5) Å, b = 17.9631(16) Å, c = 20.3944(19) Å, V =
2105.3(3) Å3, Z = 4, S = 1.057, Flack parameter = 0.007(12), Dc
=
1.675 g cmꢁ3, F(000) = 1084, m = 1.109 mmꢁ1, 3809 reflections were
used in the refinement. Rint = 0.0277, R1 = 0.0277, and wR2 = 0.0696 for
[I > 2s (I)], and R1 = 0.0326, wR2 = 0.0719 for all data, Drmax = 0.241 e Åꢁ3
,
Drmin = ꢁ0.246 e Åꢁ3. Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of A1 was
carried out on a Bruker APEX II CCD diffractometer equipped with
graphite monochromated Mo-Ka radiation (l = 0.71073 Å) using the
f/o scan technique at room temperature. A total of 3809 reflections were
used in the refinement for A1. The structure was solved by direct methods
with SHELXS-97. The hydrogen atoms were included in the final refine-
ment by use of geometrical restraints and assigned with isotropic
displacement factors. The hydrogen atoms of water molecules were
located by different maps and the bond length of O–H was restrained
to 0.85 Å and the bond angle was 1071 and then refined by a riding mode
with Ueq = 1.5Ueq(O). A full-matrix least-squares refinement on F2 was
carried out for the non-H atoms using SHELXL-97. A typical procedure for
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun.