158
Z. Bıyıklıog˘lu et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 378 (2013) 156–163
Fig. 2. UV–vis spectrum in THF for complexes 4 and 5. (For interpretation of the
references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of
this article.)
Fig. 3. UV–vis spectrum of iron(II) phthalocyanine 4 in different solvents (concen-
tration = 10 × 10−6 mol dm−3). (For interpretation of the references to color in this
figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
822, 751, 685. UV–vis (THF), ꢁmaks(log ε) nm: 333 (4.68), 605 (4.27),
668 (4.61). MS (ESI), (m/z): 1168 [M-C6H4-N(CH3)2]+.
in different solvents (CHCl3, CH2Cl2, THF, DMF, DMSO, EtOAc)
(Fig. 3 for complex 4). While iron phthalocyanine 4 showed little
aggregation in CHCl3, CH2Cl2, THF, DMF, EtOAc, DMSO showed full
aggregation. The absence of aggregated species in solution of 4 in
DMSO, DMF may be attributed to the axial coordination ability of
Fe(II) center. It is well known that the nature of solvent has a great
influence on the aggregation behavior of phthalocyanines [48,49].
On the other hand, the complex 5 showed little aggregation only in
EtOAc but cobalt phthalocyanine 5 did not show any aggregation
in CHCl3, CH2Cl2, THF, DMF, and DMSO.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis and characterization
The synthesis route for the compounds is described in Fig. 1. In
this study, the initial phthalonitrile derivative 3 [39] was obtained
from the reaction between 2-[3-(dimethylamino)phenoxy]ethanol
1 and 4-nitrophthalonitrile 2 [40] in dry DMF at 50 ◦C [41,42]. Dry
K2CO3 was used to supply the basic reaction conditions. Cyclote-
tramerization of the phthalonitrile derivative 3 to the iron(II) and
cobalt(II) phthalocyanines 4 and 5 was accomplished in the pres-
ence of anhydrous Fe(CH3COO)2, CoCl2 in n-pentanol and DBU and
the crude product chromatographed on basic alumina. The struc-
The aggregation behavior of iron and cobalt phthalocyanine
complexes 4 and 5 were also investigated at different concen-
trations in DMSO. In DMSO, as the concentration increased, the
intensity of absorption of the Q band also increased and there were
no new bands (normally blue shifted) due to the aggregated species
for all phthalocyanines (Fig. 4 for complex 4). Beer–Lambert law
was obeyed for all of the compounds in the concentrations ranging
tures of the target compounds were confirmed using UV–vis, IR, 1
H
NMR, 13C NMR, MS spectroscopic data. The analyses are consistent
with the predicted structures as shown in Section 2.
from 12 × 10−6 to 2 × 10−6 mol dm−3
The IR spectrum of the iron and cobalt phthalocyanines 4
and 5 clearly indicates the cyclotetramerization of the phthaloni-
2232 cm−1, respectively. The 1H NMR spectrum of iron(II) phthalo-
cyanine 4 indicated the aromatic protons at 7.56, 7.29, 6.45 ppm
and aliphatic protons at 4.41, 2.94 ppm. The 1H NMR spectrum of
cobalt phthalocyanine 5 could not be taken due to the paramagnetic
cobalt(II) centers [43,44]. The mass spectra of tetra-substituted
phthalocyanines 4 and 5 confirmed the proposed structure, with
the molecular ion being easily identified at 1286 [M+H]+, 1168
[M−C6H4-N(CH3)2]+, respectively.
3.3. Catalytic studies
3.3.1. Oxidation of cyclohexene with 4 and 5
As shown in Tables 1–4, all oxidation experiments to evalu-
ate the catalytic effect of complexes 4 and 5 on the oxidation
of cyclohexene were performed under different reaction condi-
tions. Schlenk tube was filled with cyclohexene (1.16 × 10−3 mol),
complex 4 (3.88 × 10−6 mol) or complex 5 (3.89 × 10−6 mol) and
with two strong absorption regions, one of them in the UV region at
about 300–350 nm (B band) and the other one in the visible region
at 600–700 nm (Q band). The electronic absorption spectra of the
iron and cobalt phthalocyanines 4 and 5, in THF at room temper-
ature are shown in Fig. 2. UV–vis spectra of iron phthalocyanine
4 (in THF) split Q bands appeared at 652, 603 nm. UV–vis spectra
of cobalt phthalocyanine 5 (in THF) split Q bands appeared at 668,
605 nm, while the split B band remained at 333 nm.
3.2. Aggregation studies
rings progressing from monomer to dimer and higher order
complexes. It is dependent on the concentration, nature of the
solvent, nature of the substituents, complexed metal ions and
temperature [45–47]. In this study, the aggregation behavior of the
iron and cobalt phthalocyanine complexes 4 and 5 are investigated
Fig. 4. UV–vis spectrum of cobalt phthalocyanine 5 in DMSO at different concen-
trations, 12 × 10−6, 10 × 10−6, 8 × 10−6, 6 × 10−6, 4 × 10−6, 2 × 10−6 mol dm−3. (For
interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred
to the web version of this article.)