S. Kalari, S. Balasubramanian and H.B. Rode
Tetrahedron Letters 71 (2021) 153028
in water afforded solely 3a in 90% yield (entry 9, Table 1). In the
crystal structure of 3a, two molecules of 3a exist in an asymmetric
unit (Fig. 2). This crystal packing arrangement is possible due to
the hydrogen bond between hydroxyl of one molecule with N1
of other molecule of 3a. Such interactions in crystal packing have
implications on solubility of these compounds and are important
in drug development. After having the optimized reaction condi-
tion in hand, the substrate scope of difluorinative-hydroxylation
reaction with respect to imidazo[1,2-a] pyridines were explored
(Scheme 1).
In some reactions, CH3CN:H2O (2:8) was employed due to lim-
ited solubility of substrates in water. Various 2-aryl imidazo[1,2-a]
pyridines containing both electron-donating and electron-with-
drawing groups on 2-aryl ring readily furnished the corresponding
products 3b-3h and 3i-3r in good to excellent yields. These sub-
stituents include alkyl (3b, 3c, 3d, 3e), methoxy (3f), 3,4-
methylenedioxy (3g), biphenyl (3h), cyano (3i), trifluoromethoxy
(3j), nitro (3k, 3l), fluoro (3m), 3,5-difluoro (3n), chloro (3o, 3p),
and bromo (3q, 3r). Furthermore, different substitution on pyridine
part of 2-aryl imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine scaffold smoothly underwent
difluorinative-hydroxylation affording 3s-3u in good to excellent
yields. Moreover, 2-sustituted polycyclic aromatic and heteroaro-
matic compounds such as 2-naphthyl, 2-bromofluorenyl, and 2-
thiophenyl, and 2-furyl were also compatible under the present
reaction condition and furnished the products (3v-3y) in moderate
yields. In addition, when the substrates with strong electron with-
drawing groups like CF3 and NO2 on imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine ring
were used, the reaction failed to give corresponding products. Of
note, Zolimidine drug underwent difluorohydroxylation to afford
3zb in 88% yield (Scheme 2). This protocol was successfully applied
to a gram scale synthesis of 3m (Scheme 3).
Interestingly, regioselective monofluorinated imidazo[1,2-a]
pyridines 2a-2f could be obtained when CHCl3:H2O (9:1) was used
in the reaction of 1a/1p/1r/1i/1y/1zb and Selectfluor (1 equivalent)
in moderate to good yields (Scheme 4). The substrates containing
4-cyanophenyl and furyl on imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine afforded
monofluorinated 2d and 2e respectively. Importantly, gastropro-
tective drug, Zolimidine (1zb), underwent monofluorination
affording 2f in 66% yield. Unfortunately, 3-pyridyl substituted imi-
dazo[1,2-a]pyridine failed to produce 2g. It is important to note
that this protocol is much better than the Sun et al. protocol
[10]. In Sun et al. protocol, the C-3 monofluorinated imidazo[1,2-
a]pyridines were obtained using DMAP as base with 2 equivalents
of Selectfluor in chloroform: water (3:1) for 14 h from imidazo[1,2-
a]pyridines. While, in current protocol, the products are obtained
in 45 min, require only 1 equivalent of Selectfluor and reaction
Fig. 1. Structre of the drugs containing difluoro substituent.
through dearomative difunctionalization and C-3 functionalization
of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines using dual reactivity of Selectfluor
under simple and mild reaction condition.
Results and discussion
In order to identify the optimal reaction condition for difluoro-
hydroxylation, we employed 2-aryl imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (1a)
and Selectfluor (1 equivalent) in dichloromethane at room temper-
ature (entry 1, Table 1). This condition furnished monofluorinated
compound 2a in 23% yield along with unreacted 1a. The use of
other chlorinating solvents i.e. CHCl3, DCE, TCE afforded 2a in
low yields and no traces of 3a were detected (entry 2, 3 and 4).
When the reaction was carried out in CHCl3:H2O (9:1, entry 5),
the trace amount of 3a was obtained along with 79% of 2a. The
similar observation was made when the reaction was performed
in TCE:H2O (9:1, entry 6). Further, we employed 2 equivalents of
Selectfluor in CH3NO2:H2O (9:1, entry 7) to afford 61% of required
3a with traces of 2a.
The reaction in CH3CN:H2O (9:1) resulted in 81% of 3a exclu-
sively. The increased yields for 2a or 3a in entry 5 to 8 could be
attributed to the presence of protic solvent as scarce solubility of
Selectfluor in aprotic solvent is reported [18]. Of note, the reaction
Table 1
Optimization of difluoro-hydroxylation of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine.a
No.
Solvent
Selectfluor (equiv.)
Time (h)
Yield of 2ab
Yield of 3ab
1c
2c
3c
4c
5
6
7
8
9
CH2Cl2
CHCl3
DCE
TCE
CHCl3:H2O (9:1)
TEC:H2O (9:1)
CH3NO2:H2O (9:1)
CH3CN:H2O (9:1)
H2O
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
0.45
1.5
3.5
3
23
31
20
25
79
74
trace
–
–
–
–
–
trace
trace
61
81
90
0.45
–
a
b
c
Reaction condition: 1a (0.1 g), Selectfluor in 2 mL of solvent at room temperature. isolated yields. unreacted 1a isolated. DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane, TCE = 1,1,2,2-
tetrachloroethane.
2