Communication
ChemComm
4
I. Kumar, P. Ramaraju and N. A. Mir, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 28 A. P. Antonchick, C. Gerding-Reimers, M. Catarinella, M. Sch u¨ rmann,
7
09–716.
H. Preut, S. Ziegler, D. Rauh and H. Waldmann, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2,
735–740.
5
6
J.-L. Li, T.-Y. Liu and Y.-C. Chen, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, 45, 1491–1500.
K. L. Jensen, G. Dickmeiss, H. Jiang, Ł. Albrecht and K. A. Jørgensen, 29 M. M. M. Santos, Tetrahedron, 2014, 70, 9735–9757.
Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, 45, 248–264.
30 See the ESI† for details of substrate synthesis and structural
assignment.
31 To facilitate isolation and analysis, the aldehyde product was directly
derivatized via a Wittig olefination to the corresponding (E)-enoate.
32 R. A. Mosey, J. S. Fisk and J. J. Tepe, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2008,
19, 2755–2762.
33 Given the greater diastereoselectivity (typically 44 : 1) observed in
previous cycloadditions between 17 and linear dienals (see ref. 33),
steric effects from the substrate may be responsible for this reduced
selectivity.
34 To the best of our knowledge, no examples of double stereodiffer-
entiating dienamine or trienamine catalysis have been reported. For
examples of double stereodifferentiation in enamine organocataly-
sis, see: J. Marjanovic, V. Divjakovic, R. Matovic, Z. Ferjancic and
R. N. Saicic, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 5555–5560.
7
8
9
For recent examples, see: H. Jiang, B. Gschwend, Ł. Albrecht, S. G.
Hansen and K. A. Jørgensen, Chem. – Eur. J., 2011, 17, 9032–9036.
Ł. Albrecht, F. Cruz Acosta, A. Fraile, A. Albrecht, J. Christensen and
K. A. Jørgensen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 9088–9092.
C. Ma, Z.-J. Jia, J.-X. Liu, Q.-Q. Zhou, L. Dong and Y.-C. Chen, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 948–951.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
0 K. Zhu, H. Huang, W. Wu, Y. Wei and J. Ye, Chem. Commun., 2013,
4
9, 2157–2159.
1 Z.-J. Jia, K. Jiang, Q.-Q. Zhou, L. Dong and Y.-C. Chen, Chem.
Commun., 2013, 49, 5892–5894.
2 J.-X. Liu, Q.-Q. Zhou, J.-G. Deng and Y.-C. Chen, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2
013, 11, 8175–8178.
3 C. Ma, J. Gu, B. Teng, Q.-Q. Zhou, R. Li and Y.-C. Chen, Org. Lett.,
013, 15, 6206–6209.
2
4 X. Li, M.-H. Lin, Y. Han, F. Wang and J.-P. Cheng, Org. Lett., 2014, 35 F. Calder ´o n, E. G. Doyag u¨ ez and A. Fern ´a ndez-Mayoralas, J. Org.
6, 114–117, and references therein. Chem., 2006, 71, 6258–6261.
5 X. Feng, Z. Zhou, C. Ma, X. Yin, R. Li, L. Dong and Y.-C. Chen, Angew. 36 F. Calder ´o n, E. G. Doyag u¨ ez, P. H.-Y. Cheong, A. Fern ´a ndez-
Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 14173–14176. Mayoralas and K. N. Houk, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 7916–7920.
6 L. Prieto, G. Talavera, U. Uria, E. Reyes, J. L. Vicario and L. Carrillo, 37 B. Alcaide, P. Almendros, A. Luna and M. R. Torres, J. Org. Chem.,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20, 2145–2148. 2006, 71, 4818–4822.
7 X.-F. Xiong, Q. Zhou, J. Gu, L. Dong, T.-Y. Liu and Y.-C. Chen, Angew. 38 N. Palyam and M. Majewski, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 4390–4392.
1
Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 4401–4404.
8 P.-Q. Chen, Y.-C. Xiao, C.-Z. Yue and Y.-C. Chen, Org. Chem. Front.,
39 J. Carpenter, A. B. Northrup, d. Chung, J. J. M. Wiener, S.-G. Kim and
D. W. C. MacMillan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 3568–3572.
40 D. Enders and C. Grondal, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1210–1212.
2
014, 1, 490–493.
9 Y. Liu, M. Nappi, E. Arceo, S. Vera and P. Melchiorre, J. Am. Chem. 41 For an example of enhanced diastereoselectivity in enantioselective
Soc., 2011, 133, 15212–15218.
0 Y. Liu, M. Nappi, E. C. Escudero-Ad ´a n and P. Melchiorre, Org. Lett.,
organocatalysis through catalyst design, see: L. Caruana, F. Kniep,
T. K. Johansen, P. H. Poulsen and K. A. Jørgensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2014, 136, 15929–15932.
2
012, 14, 1310–1313.
1 H. Jiang, C. Rodr ´ı guez-Escrich, T. K. Johansen, R. L. Davis and 42 For these highly challenging mismatched cycloadditions, we found it
K. A. Jørgensen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 10271–10274.
2 For an elegant example of a cross-conjugated cyclohexadiene-
containing trieneamine which proceeds via a stepwise mechanism,
see: K. S. Halskov, T. K. Johansen, R. L. Davis, M. Steurer, F. Jensen
and K. A. Jørgensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 12943–12946.
3 A. Dieckmann, M. Breugst and K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013,
essential to degas the reaction solution to avoid aldehyde decomposi-
tion, a measure which allowed us to successfully employ an excess of
dienophile and only one equivalent of aldehyde, which contrasts with
previous stoichiometries employed in trienamine catalysis.
43 A question arises as to whether the terms ‘matched’ and ‘mismatched’
should refer to the rate of reaction (where 19a would be the ‘matched’
product), or its selectivity (where 19b would be the ‘matched’ product).
For the purposes of this work, we use the former definition; as the
reactions of 3b to generate 11e or 11f proceed with the same trend in
facial selectivity and rate as those to give 19a and 19b, we feel the superior
(inverse) diastereoselectivity arising in the case of 13c is a result solely of
steric interactions imparted by the substrate. In other words, we propose
that this reaction is ‘mismatched’ with respect to the dienophile, and an
overturn in endo/exo selectivity for 19b is a consequence of the enforced
approach of this dienophile to the more hindered face of the molecule.
2
2
2
2
2
1
35, 3237–3242.
4 P. R. Walker, C. D. Campbell, A. Suleman, G. Carr and E. A. Anderson,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 9139–9143.
5 For seminal work on enynes, see: B. M. Trost, G. J. Tanoury, M. Lautens,
C. Chan and D. T. Macpherson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 4255–4267.
6 V. Michelet, P. Y. Toullec and J. P. Genet, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
008, 47, 4268–4315.
7 C. V. Galliford and K. A. Scheidt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46,
748–8758.
2
8
Chem. Commun.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015