1
610
H. Berthold et al.
SPECIAL TOPIC
Table 4 Recyclability of the Catalytic System with Respect to Time
um formate was replaced by a freshly prepared, cold mixture of
Et N and 96% formic acid.
3
Entry
Time of Run
Recovery
(%)
4a
(%)
b
(
min)
Study of the Recycleability
The procedure was performed exactly as described in route B. After
extraction, traces of MTBE were removed by bubbling a gentle
stream of argon through the heated (80–100 °C) mixture of 1 and
the used catalyst (Tables 3 and 4).
1
2
3
4
5
32
50
60
72
90
61
43
98
100
100
101
100
100
100
100
90
79
67
59
79
92
Acknowledgment
We are indebted to Prof. Eric Carreira, ETH Zürich, and Drs. Gerd
Ruehter, Mark J. Tebbe and Macharri Vorndran-Jones, Eli Lilly Re-
search Laboratories for helpful discussions.
1
–5 averaged
6a
References
a
After addition of ca. 40% (92 mg, 0.86 mmol) of the original amount
of dry 10% Pd/C to the reaction mixture of entry 5, catalytic activity
was almost restored.
(1) (a) Kappe, C. O.; Stadler, A.; Pichler, S.; Horeis, G.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3177. (b) Chamberlin, A. R.; Hart,
M. E.; Krutzik, P. O.; Lew, A. J. Comb. Chem. 2002, 4, 2.
b
Including the temperature ramp to reach 150 °C.
(
c) Lidström, P.; Tierney, J.; Wathey, B.; Westman, J.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9225. (d) Caddick, S.; McCarroll,
A.; Sandham, D. A. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6305.
(e) Caddick, S. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 10403.
ports,10 reduction of aryl nitriles was unexpectedly
sluggish. This observation was utilized for the selective
reduction of a nitro group in presence of a nitrile (Table 1,
entry 7). Recyclability of the solvent/catalyst system has
been demonstrated. After five repetitive catalytic cycles a
(2) (a) Loupy, A.; Perreux, L.; Petit, A. Ceram. Trans. 2001,
111, 163. (b) Varma, R. S. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 193.
(
(
3) Huddleston, J. G.; Willauer, H. D.; Griffin, S. T.; Rogers, R.
D. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 2523.
4) (a) Seddon, K. R. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1997, 68,
4
0% loss in catalytic activity was observed, which could
almost be restored by adding a corresponding amount of
fresh catalyst (Table 4).
351. (b) Brennecke, J. F.; Maginn, E. J. AIChE J. 2001, 47,
2384.
(
5) (a) Westman, J. PCT Int. Appl. WO 0072956 A1, 2000;
Chem. Abstr. 2001, 134, 17312. (b) Leadbeater, N. E.;
Torenius, H. M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3145. (c) Ley, S.
V.; Leach, A. G.; Storer, R. I. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1H NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker AVANCE 300 instru-
ment at 300 MHz. Irradiations were performed in a multimode re-
actor (MLS ETHOS 1600 Milestone Inc.). All experiments were
carried out in sealed 100 mL PTFE reaction vessels. Magnetic stir-
ring with teflon-coated stirring bars was used in all operations. Dur-
ing the experiments, time, pressure (APC-80 pressure sensor),
microwave power and internal temperature (ATC-FiberOptic) were
monitored/controlled.
2
001, 358. (d) Olivier-Bourbigou, H.; Magna, L. J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 2002, 182-183, 419.
(
6) (a) Ram, S.; Ehrenkaufer, R. E. Synthesis 1988, 91.
(
b) Heck, R. F.; Cortese, N. A. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42,
3491. (c) Ranu, B. C.; Sarkar, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
8649. (d) Nolan, S. P.; Hiller, A. C.; Lee, H. M.; Stevens, E.
Chemicals were purchased from the following suppliers: From Flu-
D. Organometallics 2001, 20, 4246.
ka 1; from Aldrich 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, formic acid 96% and dry 10% Pd/C;
(7) (a) Bose, A. K.; Banik, B. K.; Barakat, K. J.; Wagle, D. R.;
Manhas, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5746. (b) Danks, T.
N.; Desai, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5963.
from Acros 5, 6, and Et N; from Janssen 2; from Merck-Schuchart
3
ammonium formate. All reagents were used as purchased. Ammo-
nium formate was handled under exclusion of moisture in an argon
atmosphere. All experiments were run in 100 mL Teflon bombs
(8) (a) Welton, T. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071. (b) Dupont, J.;
Suarez, P. A. Z.; Dullius, J. E. L.; Einloft, S.; De Souza, R.
F. Polyhedron 1996, 15, 1217. (c) Dupont, J.; Suarez, P. A.
Z.; Dullius, J. E. L.; Einloft, S.; De Souza, R. F. Inorg. Chim.
Acta 1997, 255, 207. (d) Dupont, J.; De Souza, R. F.; Zinn,
F. K.; Monteiro, A. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8,
177. (e) Jessop, P. G.; Liotta, C. L.; Eckert, C. A.; McKoon,
E.; Pollet, P.; Brown, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
1254. (f) Eyman, D. P.; Wu, X.; Letuchy, Y. A. J. Catal.
1996, 161, 164. (g) Seddon, K. R.; Adams, C. J.; Earle, M. J.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 1043. (h) Welton, T.; Parker, D. G.;
Dyson, P. J.; Ellis, D. J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 25.
(i) Olivier, H.; Chauvin, Y.; Mussmann, L. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2698. (j) Welton, T.; Dyson, P. J.;
Ellis, D. J. Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 705.
®
equipped with Teflon coated stirring bars. IL 1 was handled pref-
erably with plastic lab ware.
Catalytic Tranfer Hydrogenation; General Procedures
Route A (Table 1, Entries 1–7): Substrates (3.27 mmol to 3.85
mmol) were dissolved in the ionic liquid 1 (3 mL) and 10% Pd/C
(50 mg/mmol substrate) was added. A five molar excess of finely
ground ammonium formate was added and the vessel sealed. The
vessel was irradiated with microwaves of max. 300 W with a tem-
perature ramp to reach 150 °C within 10 min, retaining this temper-
ature until the total time of 80 min had been expired. After cooling,
the reaction mixture was exhaustively extracted with MTBE and
checked by TLC (hexane–EtOAc, 80:20). The collected organic
phases were filtered through a short plug of silica gel to remove
traces of catalyst and evaporated. No further purification of the
products was required, since purity was typically >95% as checked
by NMR spectroscopy.
(9) Kost, A. N.; Sheinkman, A. K. J. Gen. Chem. USSR 1963,
33, 538.
(10) Brown, G. R.; Foubister, A. J. Synthesis 1982, 1036.
(11) Sasson, Y.; Blum, J.; Wiener, H. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
4
481.
Route B: (Table 2, Entries 1–7): The experiments were run under
identical conditions as described for route A, except that ammoni-
(
12) Ngo, H. L.; LeCompte, K.; Hargens, L.; McEwen, A. B.
Thermochim. Acta 2000, 357-358, 97.
Synthesis 2002, No. 11, 1607–1610 ISSN 0039-7881 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York