K. Karami et al.
1.5 mmol base, 8 ml methanol, 0.02 g 1/TiO2 or 2/TiO2 as catalyst.
The mixture was stirred in a pre-heated oil bath. After the
reactions were completed, the solid catalyst was separated by
centrifuge, washed with water several times to eliminate base
and solid, washed with acetone to eliminate adsorbed organic
substrate and dried at 100ꢀC. The product of the reaction blend
was analyzed by GC. Also, the products were characterized by
comparing their melting points, 1H and 13C NMR spectra with
those found in the literature.[21]
Figure 1. The structures of dispersed palladium complexes.
emission scanning electron microscope was employed to
show nano dimensions. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns
were recorded on a Philips X’Pert diffractometer with Cu Ka
radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA, with a scan speed of 2ꢀ minÀ1
and a range of 2θ from 5ꢀ to 80ꢀ. The morphology, structure
and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) of catalyst were
analyzed on a JSM2100F transmission electron microscope
with an EDS spectrometer. The sample for transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) was prepared by placing a drop of the
suspension in ethanol on to a continuous carbon-coated copper
TEM grid and drying at room temperature under atmospheric
pressure.
Results and Discussion
XRD Pattern
Powder XRD analysis confirmed that the TiO2 nanoparticles were
in the anatase phase in comparison with standard diffractions
from JCPDS card 21-1272. In the case of 1/TiO2, the XRD pattern
indicated that the amount of metallic Pd was less than 3%,
verifying complex 1 coated on the TiO2 (Fig. 2).
Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM)
Microstructure
The FESEM images showed catalysts with nanoparticles. The
surface morphology of the catalysts has also been investigated.
It was indicated that palladium complex 1 was agglomerated
on the TiO2, which was synthesized without pH adsorption
method (Fig. 3a). But in the case of 2/TiO2, it was verified that pH
adsorption method played an important role in the distribution of
nanoparticles (Fig. 3b).
Catalyst Preparation
Synthesis of palladium complexes
Synthesis of complex 1 has been reported previously..[19] Besides,
complex 2 was prepared by the method reported in our earlier
work.[20]
2: Yield 93%; m.p. 180–184. Elemental analysis calcd for
C25H23NIPPd: C, 49.90; H, 3.85; N, 2.33. Found: C, 49.79; H, 3.76; N,
2.41%. IR (KBr, cmÀ1); a (N-H) 3223, s (N-H) 3161. 1HNMR (300MHz,
ppm, CDCl3); d = 4.02 (brs, 2H, CH2), 4.23(brs, 2H, NH2), 6.37
Transmission Electron Micrsoscopy (TEM) Microstructure and
Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS)
3
(m, 2H, C6H4), 6.82 (t, 1H, C6H4, JHH = 6 Hz), 6.95 (d, 1H, C6H4,
3JHH = 6 Hz), 7.30 (m, 9H, 3C6H5), 7.69 (m, 6H, 3C6H5). 13CNMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3, ppm); Caliphatic {d =49.2}, Caromatic {d = 120.05, 120.29,
To study the possible reason for the different catalytic performance
of the catalysts, the surface morphology of the catalysts was also
characterized by TEM. A series of TEM figures were taken from
1/TiO2 and 2/TiO2 catalysts before use in the Suzuki and Heck
reactions, and are presented in Fig. 4(a) and (b) respectively,
which indicate size distribution and EDS spectra of the
isolated catalyst. Evidently, highly dispersed spherical palladium
complex nanoparticles of size 5–20 nm on the TiO2 surface
were observed.
2
122.63, 123.76, 132.89, 137.10, 134.18, 134.30 (Co, PPh3, JPC = 16),
1
125.71, 126.03, 129.71, 130.05, 135.54, 135.66 (Ci, PPh3, JPC = 40)}.
31PNMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 42.21.
Nano-catalyst preparation
2/TiO2 catalyst was prepared according to the adsorption
method by following the literature.[18] 0.68 g TiO2 was added to
60 ml aqueous solution of 2 (0.01 mol lÀ1). pH was adjusted 1.5
by 2 M HCl aqueous solution and the suspension was vigorously
stirred for 6 h at room temperature. By filtration of the suspension
after adsorption, the powdery solid was separated and washed
with a large amount of water several times. Then powdery solid
was dried at 100ꢀC. To prepare 1/TiO2 this process was done
using 1 without pH adjustment.
EDS provides an elemental analysis of the samples,
showing the presence and relative distribution of the present
Catalytic Reactions
In the Suzuki reaction, 0.02 g (0.12 mol% Pd) 1/TiO2 or 2/TiO2
as heterogeneous catalyst, 0.5 mmol aryl halide, 0.75 mmol
phenylboronic acid and 1.5 mmol base were added to a balloon,
followed by addition of methanol 8 ml. The mixture was stirred in
a pre-heated oil bath. In the Heck reaction, a round-bottom flask
was charged with 0.5 mmol aryl halide, 0.75 mmol alkene,
Figure 2. Powder XRD profile of 1/TiO2 nanoparticle.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/aoc
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Appl. Organometal. Chem. (2013)