1256
TANG et al.
Evaluation of isothiocyanate derivatives against
REFERENCES
E. carotovora. The synthesized compounds were
tested for their antibacterial activity against
E. carotovora using the turbidimetric method. An aliquot
(0.1 mL) of the bacterial suspension (109 CFU/mL)
was added into a conical flask (35 mL) containing
10 mL of lysogeny broth (LB), which contained ITCs at
different concentrations (µg/mL) dissolved in DMSO.
The amount of DMSO in both control and assay was
below 0.1% (v/v). The mixtures were cultivated in a
shaker at 30°C for 12 h. After cultivation, the turbidity
of the bacteria solution was determined by using an
Agilent 8453 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. A sample
(1 mL) was taken from each conical flask, and optical
density (OD) value was measured at the wave length
of 600 nm. The relation of OD value with the
predetermined concentration of bacteria was used for
determining the actual concentrations of bacteria.
Inhibition rates of ITCs against bacteria were cal-
culated by comparing OD values with controls.
1. Lalancette, N., Furman, L.A., and White, J.F., Crop
Prot., 2013, vol. 43, p. 7. doi 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.08.006
2. Belakhov, V.V. and Garabadzhiu, A.V., Russ. J. Gen.
Chem., 2014, vol. 84, no. 13, p. 2664. doi 10.1134/
S1070363214130271
3. Belakhov, V.V. and Garabadzhiu, A.V., Russ. J. Gen.
Chem., 2016, vol. 86, no. 13, p. 3002. doi 10.1134/
S1070363216130120
4. Perelló, A., Lampugnani, G., Abramoff, C., Slusarenko, A.,
and Bello, G.D., Int. J. Pest Manage., 2016, vol. 63,
no. 2, p. 157. doi 10.1080/09670874.2016.1252478
5. Smolinska, U., Morra, M.J., Knudsen G.R., and James, R.L.,
Plant Dis., 2007, vol. 87, no. 4, p. 407. doi 10.1094/
pdis.2003.87.4.407
6. Deng, Q., Zinoviadou, K.G., Galanakis, C.M., Orlien, V.,
Grimi, N., Vorobiev, E., Lebovka N., and Barba, F.J.,
Food Eng. Rev., 2015, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 357. doi 10.1007/
s12393-015-9122-2
7. Dufour, V., Stahl M., and Baysse, C., Microbiology,
2015, vol. 161, no. Pt 2, p. 229. doi 10.1099/
mic.0.082362-0
8. Ugolini, L., Martini, C., Lazzeri, L., D’Avino, L., and
Mari, M., Postharvest Biol. Tec., 2014, vol. 90, p. 34.
doi 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.12.002
Data analysis. The half maximal effective con-
centration (EC50) values were calculated by the linear
regression of the probit % of inhibition of mycelial
growth or the number of bacteria as a function of the
log of inhibitor concentrations. All data were subjected
to one-way ANOVA using SPSS 17.0 statistical
analysis software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA.). The
confidence limits used in this study were based on 95%
(P < 0.05).
9. Ntalli, N. and Caboni, P., Phytochem. Rev., 2017,
vol. 16, no. 5, p. 827. doi 10.1007/s11101-017-9491-7
10. Mochida, K. and Ogawa, T., J. Sci. Food Agr., 2010,
vol. 88, no. 10, p. 1704. doi 10.1002/jsfa.3268
11. Main, M., Mccaffrey J.P., and Morra, M.J., J. Appl.
Entomol., 2015, vol. 138, no. 9, p. 701. doi 10.1111/
jen.12128
CONCLUSIONS
12. Bangarwa, S.K. and Norsworthy, J.K., Crop Prot.,
2015, vol. 74, p. 145. doi 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.04.012
13. Pilyugin, V.S., Sapozhnikov, Y.E., and Sapozhnikova, N.A.,
A series of aromatic ITCs were prepared by
reacting p-aromatic amines with carbon disulphide and
further treating with molecular iodine to yield
corresponding isothiocyanate derivatives. Structure-
activity relationships for the newly synthesized com-
pounds against plant pathogenic fungi and bacteria
were evaluated. The results indicated that p-nitro-
phenyl ITC was the most effective in inhibiting
R. solani and E. carotovora. The present study
revealed that some of the compounds exhibited
promising antimicrobial activities and could be used as
an acceptable alternative to the traditional synthetic
fungicides in controlling R. solani and E. carotovora.
Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2004, vol. 74, no. 5, p. 738.
14. Ko, M.O., Kim, M.B., and Lim, S.B., J. Microbiol.
Biotechnol., 2016, vol. 26, no. 12, p. 2036. doi 10.4014/
jmb.1606.06008
15. Milelli, A., Fimognari, C., Ticchi, N., Neviani, P.,
Minarini A., and Tumiatti, V., Mini Rev. Med. Chem.,
2014, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 963. doi 10.2174/
1389557514666141106131909
16. Li, D., Shu, Y., Li, P., Zhang, W., Ni H., and Cao, Y.,
Med. Chem. Res., 2012, vol. 22, no. 7, p. 3119. doi
10.1007/s00044-012-0323-4
17. Hansch, C., Gao, H., and Hoekman, D., A Generalized
Approach to Comparative QSAR, Devillers. J., Ed.,
Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis, 1998, p. 285.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Key Projects in the
National Science and Technology Pillar Program of
China (2014BAC14B00).
18. Schultz, T.W. and Comeaux, J.L., B. Environ. Contam.
Tox., 1996, vol. 56, no. 4, p. 638. doi 10.1007/
s001289900093
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 88 No. 6 2018