7412
I. M. Geraskin et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 7410–7412
toluene or acetonitrile. The results of the oxidations are summa-
rized in Table 1.
Fund, administered by the American Chemical Society (Grant
PRF-45510-GB-3).
Using benzylic alcohols as model substrates, we have found that
IBX-ester 1 is the most efficient stoichiometric oxidant in the cata-
lytic oxidation reactions. Indeed, the oxidation of 4-methoxybenzyl
alcohol using oxidant 1 at room temperature in the presence of
Fe(III) phthalocyanine complex 4 (10 mol %) affords the respective
aldehyde in a 100% conversion (95% isolated yield after chromato-
graphy) after 1 h of stirring at room temperature (Table 1, entry
1a). The conversion is much lower when reagents 2 and 3 are em-
ployed for the oxidation of benzylic alcohols under similar condi-
tions using the same catalyst 4 (entries 1d, 1e, 2d, 3c, 4d, and
6d). Iron(III) phthalocyanine complex 4 and ruthenium(II)-car-
bonyl tetraphenylporphyrin 6 are the most efficient catalysts in
these oxidations. The oxidations in the presence of Ru(II) complex
6 (entries 1c, 2c, 3b, 4c, and 6c) proceed only slightly slower com-
pared to the Fe(III) complex 4 (entries 1a, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5, and 6a,b),
while the Co(II) tetraphenylporphyrin 5 did not show any signifi-
cant catalytic effect (entries 1b, 2b, and 4b). The availability and
low cost of iron(III) complex 4 as compared those of to the ruthe-
nium porphyrin 6 clearly make it a potentially useful reagent for
biomimetic catalytic transformations.
The oxidation of alcohols with reagent 1 in the absence of cat-
alyst proceeds extremely slow and shows measurable conversion
to the aldehyde only after 4–7 days of stirring at room temperature
(entries 1g and 2e).11 The sulfur-containing benzylic alcohols (en-
tries 7 and 8) show significantly lower reactivity in the catalytic
oxidations, and the oxidation of organic sulfur to sulfoxide or sul-
fone is not observed under these conditions. The allylic alcohol
demonstrates about the same reactivity in the catalytic oxidations
(entries 9a,b), while the aliphatic substrates are much less reactive
(entries 10–13).
References and notes
1. (a) Moriarty, R. M.; Prakash, O. Hypervalent Iodine in Organic Chemistry:
Chemical Transformations; Wiley-Interscience, 2008; (b) Wirth, T., Ed.;
Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry: Modern Developments in Organic Synthesis.
[In: Top. Curr. Chem., 2003; 224], 2003; (c) Varvoglis, A. Hypervalent Iodine in
Organic Synthesis; Academic Press: London, 1997; (d) Koser, G. F. Adv.
Heterocycl. Chem. 2004, 86, 225–292; (e) Zhdankin, V. V. Sci. Synth. 2007, 31a,
161–234; (f) Ladziata, U.; Zhdankin, V. V. ARKIVOC 2006, ix, 26–58; (g) Ochiai,
M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 2771–2781; (h) Ochiai, M. Chem. Rec. 2007, 7,
12–23; (i) Deprez, N. R.; Sanford, M. S. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1924–1935; (j)
Tohma, H.; Kita, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 111–124; (k) Kita, Y.; Fujioka, H.
Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 79, 701–713; (l) Quideau, S.; Pouysegu, L.; Deffieux, D.
Synlett 2008, 467–495; (m) Togo, H.; Sakuratani, K. Synlett 2002, 1966–1975;
(o) Feldman, K. S. ARKIVOC 2003, vi, 179–190.
2. (a) Groves, J. T.; Nemo, T. E.; Myers, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1032–
1033; (b) Moro-oka, Y. Catal. Today 1998, 45, 3–12; (c) Moro-oka, Y.; Akita, M.
Catal. Today 1998, 41, 327–338; (d) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic
Synthesis, Wiley, New York, 1994.
3. (a) Moriarty, R. M.; Kosmeder, J. W.; Zhdankin, V. V. ‘Iodosylbenzene’ in
Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, Wiley, Chichester, 2004; (b)
Stang, P. J.; Zhdankin, V. V. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1123–1178; (c) Zhdankin, V. V.;
Stang, P. J. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2523–2584.
4. Drying iodosylbenzene at elevated temperatures should be avoided; a violent
explosion of 3.0 g PhIO upon drying at 110 °C in vacuum has recently been
reported: McQuaid, K. M.; Pettus, T. R. R. Synlett 2004, 2403–2405.
5. (a) Nemykin, V. N.; Addei-Maanu, C.; Koposov, A. Y.; Tretyakova, I. N.; Polshyn,
E. V. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2006, 10, 793; (b) Nemykin, V. N.; Chernii, V.
Y.; Volkov, S. V.; Bundina, N. I.; Kaliya, O. L.; Li, V. D.; Lukyanets, E. A. J.
Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 1999, 3, 87–98.
6. (a) Zhdankin, V. V.; Koposov, A. Y.; Litvinov, D. N.; Ferguson, M. J.; McDonald,
R.; Luu, T.; Tykwinski, R. R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6484–6491; (b) Zhdankin, V.
V.; Litvinov, D. N.; Koposov, A. Y.; Luu, T.; Ferguson, M. J.; McDonald, R.;
Tykwinski, R. R. Chem. Commun. 2004, 106–107; (c) According to SciFinder
Scholar, compound 1 (Benzoic Acid, 2-iodyl, 1-methylethyl ester, Registry
number 674776-90-0) is currently available from three chemical companies:
AAT Pharmaceutical, LLC (USA), Atlantic SciTech Group, Inc. (USA), and
SinoChemexper Company (China).
IBX ester 1 and iodosylbenzene show similar reactivity in the
oxidation of same substrates in the presence of Fe(III) phthalocya-
nine complex 4 as catalyst (compare entries 1a and 1f, 4a and 4e,
9a and 9c). Both iodosylbenzene and reagent 1 are commercially
available or can be conveniently prepared from common precur-
sors. However, in contrast to the insoluble, thermally unstable
and potentially explosive iodosylbenzene,3,4 reagent 1 is soluble
in organic solvents, can be stored for extended periods at room
temperature, and is not explosive. The results of our comparative
studies (Table 1) confirm that IBX ester 1 can be effectively used
as a stoichiometric oxidant in biomimetic oxidations catalyzed
by metal porphyrin or phthalocyanine complexes.
7. (a) Zhdankin, V. V.; Koposov, A. Y.; Netzel, B. C.; Yashin, N. V.; Rempel, B. P.;
Ferguson, M. J.; Tykwinski, R. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2194–2196; (b)
Koposov, A. Y.; Karimov, R. R.; Geraskin, I. M.; Nemykin, V. N.; Zhdankin, V. V. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8452–8458.
8. Koposov, A. Y.; Zhdankin, V. V. Synthesis 2005, 22–24.
9. (a) Yang, Z. W.; Kang, Q. X.; Quan, F.; Lei, Z. Q. J. Mol. Catal. A 2007, 261, 190–
195; (b) Vatele, J.-M. Synlett 2006, 2055–2058; (c) Adam, W.; Gelalcha, F. G.;
Saha-Moeller, C. R.; Stegmann, V. R. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1915–1918; (d)
Mueller, P.; Godoy, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 2361–2364.
10. Typical procedure: To a vigorously stirred solution of reagents 1–3 (0.08 mmol)
and catalysts 4–6 (0.011 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (3 ml), the appropriate
alcohol (0.11 mmol) was added. The resulting solution was stirred at room
temperature for the indicated time (Table 1). A portion of the crude reaction
mixture (0.1 ml) was passed through 1 cm of silica gel suspended in a pasteur
pipet and washed with the mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate 3:2 (1 ml). The
obtained solution was analyzed by GC–MS.
11. It was previously reported that reagents 1 and 3 do not oxidize alcohols in
dichloromethane at room temperature in the absence of acids or Lewis
acids.6,7b IBX-amide 2 can effectively oxidize alcohols without catalysts,7a and
in fact the addition of Fe(III) phthalocyanine complex 4 does not lead to any
improvement of oxidative reactivity of reagent 2 (entry 1d of Table 1).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a research Grant from the National
Science Foundation (Grant CHE-0702734) and Petroleum Research