influence of a new tailor-made, task-specific, and stable ionic
liquid, [bmIm]OH, in Michael addition.
procedure11 to provide the corresponding adducts in high
yields. The results are summarized in Table 1. Very
interestingly, all open-chain 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds such
as acetylacetone, ethyl acetoacetate, diethyl malonate, and
ethyl cyanoacetate reacted with methyl vinyl ketone (entries
1, 4, 7, 15, 19, 22, 24) and chalcone (entries 9-12, 18) to
give the usual monoaddition products, whereas the same
reactions with methyl acrylate (entries 2, 6, 13, 16) or
acrylonitrile (entries 3, 14, 17) provided exclusively bis-
addition products. The use of 0.5 equiv or less of methyl
acrylate or acrylonitrile in these reactions also did not
produce any monoaddition product; only the bis-adducts were
isolated in proportionate yields. On the other hand, use of
excess methyl vinyl ketone did not furnish any bis-addition
product under identical reaction conditions. Surprisingly, the
reaction of nitroethane with methyl vinyl ketone, methyl
acrylate, or acrylonitrile proceeded in the normal way,
providing the monoadduct (entries 24-26). Although all the
conventional reagents produce the monoadduct in Michael
additions with these conjugated alkenes, the formation of
bis-adducts in one stroke with methyl acrylate and acryloni-
trile is not unprecedented and was reported in one procedure
using trans-hydrido(n′-o-enolato)ruthenium(II) complex.8d
But, the serious drawbacks of using this ruthenium catalyst
are a long reaction time (48-96 h) at 50-70 °C and
relatively low yields (60-89%). However, in general, the
great significance of this rather unusual bis-addition is the
formation of two C-C bonds in one step; moreover, these
adducts (entries 2, 3, 6, 13, 14, 16, 17) have great synthetic
potential, as they contain several important functional groups.
This ionic liquid, [bmIm]OH, is very successful in catalyzing
The Michael addition is one of the most useful carbon-
carbon bond-forming reactions and has wide synthetic
5
applications in organic synthesis. This reaction is tradition-
ally catalyzed by strong bases that often lead to undesirable
6
side reactions. A variety of Lewis acids are found to catalyze
this reaction, and these procedures are also not free from
7
disadvantages. Thus, a number of milder reagents such as
8
a
8b
8c
8d
2 3 2 3
Al O , K CO , rhodium complex, ruthenium complex,
8e
8f
clay-supported nickel bromide, quaternary ammonium salt,
and N-phenyltris(dimethylamino)iminophosphorane immo-
8g
bilized on polystyrene resin have been developed over the
past few years. Recently, room-temperature ionic liquids,
particularly [bmIm]BF
4
, have been used as alternative green
9
a
solvents to carry out the Michael addition using Ni(acac)
2
9
b
and Cu(II) triflate as catalysts. However, we have discov-
10
ered that a task-specific ionic liquid [bmIm]OH efficiently
promotes the Michael addition of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds,
cyano esters, and nitro alkanes to a variety of conjugated
ketones, carboxylic esters, and nitriles without requiring any
other catalyst and solvent. The dramatic influence of this
catalyst in additions to certain conjugated alkenes is observed
6-9
(Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
(9) (a) Dell’Anna, M. M.; Gallo, V.; Mastrorilli, P.; Nobile, C. F.;
Romanazzi, G.; Suranna, G. P. Chem. Commun. 2002, 434. (b) Yadav, J.
S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Baishya, G.; Narsaiah, A. V. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34,
1
02.
(10) Preparation of 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Hydroxide [bmIm]-
1
3
OH. This was prepared by modification of a reported related procedure.
A variety of structurally diverse active methylene com-
pounds underwent Michael additions with several R,â-
unsaturated ketones, carboxylic esters, and nitriles by this
Solid potassium hydroxide (2.3 g, 40 mmol) was added to a solution of
[bmIm]Br (8.8 g, 40 mmol) in dry methylene chloride (20 mL), and the
mixture was stirred vigorously at room temperature for 10 h. The precipitated
KBr was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated to leave the crude
[
bmIm]OH as a viscous liquid that was washed with ether (2 × 20 mL)
(
3) (a) Ranu, B. C.; Das, A.; Samanta, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2002, 1520. (b) Ranu, B. C.; Dey, S. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2865.
c) Ranu, B. C.; Dey, S. S.; Hajra, A. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2417. (d)
and dried at 90 °C for 10 h to prepare the pure ionic liquid for use. This
was characterized by spectroscopic data: IR (neat) 3435, 3060, 1569, 1168
1
(
-
1 1
cm ; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.83 (t, J ) 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.15-1.32
(m, 2H), 1.76-1.86 (m, 2H), 3.18-3.25 (bs, 1H), 4.00 (s, 3H), 4.23 (t, J
) 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J ) 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J ) 1.5 Hz, 1H), 10.15
(s, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 13.1, 19.0, 31.8, 36.4, 49.3, 122.0, 123.5,
Ranu, B. C.; Dey, S. S. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4183. (e) Ranu, B. C.; Das,
A. Aust. J. Chem. 2004, 57, 605. (f) Ranu, B. C.; Jana, R.; Dey, S. S. Chem.
Lett. 2004, 33, 274. (g) Ranu, B. C.; Jana, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
+
7
75.
136.5; HRMS calcd for C8H16N2O (M - OH) 139.2182, found 139.2355.
(4) Ranu, B. C.; Banerjee, S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4517.
5) (a) Perlmutter, P. Conjugate Addition Reactions in Organic Synthesis;
(11) Representative Experimental Procedure for Michael Addition
of Methyl Vinyl Ketone with Ethyl 2-Oxo-cyclopentane Carboxylate
(Entry 19). Methyl vinyl ketone (420 mg, 6 mmol) was added dropwise to
a well stirred mixture of ethyl 2-oxo-cyclopentane carboxylate (755 mg, 5
mmol) in [bmIm]OH (468 mg, 3 mmol), and the reaction mixture was stirred
for 0.5 h until completion of the reaction (TLC). The product was then
distilled off directly from the reaction mixture to provide pure Michael
adduct (1.08 g, 96%) as a colorless oil. If the reaction was carried out in a
relatively smaller scale (1-2 mmol), the reaction mixture was extracted
with ethyl acetate. The extract was washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and
evaporated, leaving the crude product, which was purified by column
chromatography over silica gel to provide the pure product. The compound
(
Pergamon: Oxford, 1992. (b) Jung, M. E. In ComprehensiVe Organic
Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Semmelhack, M. F., Eds.; Pergamon:
Oxford, 1991; Vol. 4.
(
6) (a) Bergmann, E. D.; Ginsburg, D.; Pappo, R. Org. React. 1959, 10,
79. (b) Kobayashi, S. Synlett 1994, 689.
7) (a) Christoffers, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1259. (b) Srivastava,
1
(
N.; Banik, B. K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2109. (c) Shimizu, K. I.; Miyagi,
M.; Kan-No, T.; Kodama, T.; Kitayama, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
7
421.
(8) (a) Ranu, B. C.; Bhar, S.; Sarkar, D. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
1
13
2
811. Ranu, B. C.; Bhar, S. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1327. (b) Zhang, Z.;
was identified by comparison of its IR and H and C NMR spectroscopic
data with those reported.9b The ionic liquid left in the reaction vessel was
rinsed with ether (2 mL) and dried under vacuum at 90 °C for 2 h to
eliminate any water trapped from moisture and reused for subsequent
reactions. To compensate for the loss of some ionic liquid during washing,
an amount (200 mg) of fresh ionic liquid was added after five runs. This
procedure was followed for all the reactions listed in Table 1. However, in
bis-additions, 2 equiv of methyl acrylate and acrylonitrile was used.
Dong, Y.-W.; Wang, G.-W.; Komatsu, K. Synlett 2004, 61. (c) Paganelli,
S.; Schionato, A.; Botteghi, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2807. (d) Alvarez,
S. G.; Hasegawa, S.; Hirano, M.; Komiya, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
209. (e) Laszlo, P.; Montaufier, M.-T.; Randriamahefa, S. L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 4867. (f) Kim, D. Y.; Huh, S. C.; Kim, S. M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 6299. (g) Bensa, D.; Constantieux, T.; Rodriguez, J. Synthesis
5
2
004, 923.
3050
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 14, 2005