I. Duttagupta et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 57 (2016) 3858–3861
3859
COOH
O
O
COOH
COOH
NH2
1
, n = 1, 2, 3
HN
NH
NH
NH
NH
HO C
N
X = CH , NH, NCbz
2
NH
NH
2
Proline analogue,
X = CH , n = 1
2
X
Ph
n
Figure 1. Structure of cyclic a-hydrazino acids.
Figure 2. General structure of model tripeptide.
structure Phe-
Accordingly tripeptide 1 was chosen as our model substrate
Fig. 2). The cyclic -hydrazino acid in the central position was
varied (analogues and enantiomers). The proteolytic stability was
W
Pro-Val are recognized by the enzymes.7a,d
MeO
O
(
a
NH
compared to the stability of proline (when X = CH
containing peptide under similar conditions.
2
,
n = 1)
NCbz
2
H
N
H
N
MeO C
Methyl ester of mono Cbz protected d-azaproline (Aza-Pro)
MeO C
O
N
2
O
2
27b–d
(racemic) was used as the starting material for the
synthesis of the d-azaproline containing protected tripeptide 3
according to our previously reported procedures7 (Fig. 3).
O
O
Ph
Ph
NHFmoc
N
NCbz
NHFmoc
c
NCbz
Piperazic (Piz) acid and its seven membered (diazepane car-
boxylic acid) analogue containing tripeptides were synthesized
from the dipeptides 4 and 5 which in turn were synthesized using
our previously reported procedure.7b D/L Configuration of the
3
a
3b
Figure 3. d-Azaproline containing tripeptides.
7b
hydrazino acids were established previously. Compounds 4 and
7
b
5
on Boc deprotection followed by selective Cbz protection
Ph
Ph
yielded 6 and 7, respectively. The diastereomeric mixtures of
mono protected dipeptides (6a/6b, 7a/7b) were nicely separated
by flash column chromatography using silica gel. Diastereomers
were then separately converted to the corresponding protected
tripeptides by treating with Fmoc-Val-Cl and AgCN in benzene to
obtain 8a, 8b and 9a, 9b, respectively (Scheme 1).
The protected tripeptides were then deprotected to obtain the
model peptides. Compounds 3a, 8a, and 9a were deprotected par-
tially to prepare the Cbz protected tripeptides 10a, 11a, 12a
CO
2
Me
CO Me
2
HN
O
HN
O
1
. TFA (20%), DCM, 4 h
*
*
2
. CbzCl, Et N, DCM
NBoc
3
NH
o
-15 C, 30 min
NBoc
n
NCbz
n
4, n = 1
, n = 2
6
a (44%), 6b (39%), n = 1
7
a (46%), 7b (37%), n = 2
5
Ph
CO Me
2
(Scheme 2) and the compounds were treated with TFA to protonate
O
O
N
Fmoc-L-Val-Cl, AgCN
60 oC, C H , 30 min
the free amine in order to eliminate the chances of intramolecular
HN
7
c
cyclization during the storage or handling.
*
NHFmoc
NCbz
6
6
To synthesize the completely deprotected tripeptides, com-
pounds 3, 8, and 9 were subjected to sequential hydrolysis, hydro-
geno-lysis and Fmoc deprotection. Complete deprotection of
individual isomers yielded the tripeptides 13a, 13b, 14a, 14b,
and 15a, 15b as their respective piperidine salts (Scheme 3).
The stability of these compounds in the presence of enzymes
was evaluated against the standard proline based tripeptide 18 in
order to compare and test the efficacy of the enzymes. Compound
8
9
a (86%), 8b (80%), n = 1
a (69%), 9b (73%), n = 2
n
Scheme 1. Synthesis of protected tripeptides 8 and 9.
CO Me
2
1
. iPrOH, THF, H O
2
O
Ph
O
LiOH, CaCl , rt. 45 min
HN
2
1
8 was prepared by sequential peptide coupling from N-Boc-
L-pro-
N
2. Piperidene (20%),
DMF, rt., 12 h
line. N-Boc- -proline was subjected to EDC coupling with -pheny-
L
L
3
a, n = 1
8a, n = 2
a, n = 3
NHFmoc
NCbz
lalanine methyl ester to yield the protected dipeptide 16. This
dipeptide on N-Boc deprotection followed by EDC coupling with
N-Boc L-valine yielded the protected tripeptide 17. The protected
n
3
. TFA (10%) in
9
o
DCM, 0 C, 10 min
CO -
2
tripeptide 17 on ester hydrolysis and N-Boc deprotection yielded
the TFA salt of the control tripeptide 18 (Scheme 4). TFA salt was
O
Ph
O
Overall yield:
HN
1
3
confirmed by
C
NMR as peak corresponding at 161.9
10a (65%), n = 1
N
1
1a (62%), n = 2
2a (61%), n = 3
NH3+
(
q, JC,F = 36 Hz) and 115.9 (q, JC,F = 288 Hz) are for TFA.
NCbz
1
n
Proteolytic stability of cyclic
peptides
a-hydrazino acid-containing
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Cbz-protected tripeptides 10a, 11a, 12a.
Proteolytic cleavage breaks down proteins in food into smaller
peptides and amino acids so that they can be absorbed and used
by an organism. Similar fate is met by the therapeutic peptides
when taken orally; most of the bioactive peptides undergo prote-
olytic degradation into many smaller peptides and amino acids.
Instead of choosing individual enzymes based on their selectiv-
ity of substrates, a broad range of them ought to be used in our
study. Consequently Swiss Albino mice were chosen as model
mammals for this study.
Inbred mice were purchased and maintained in the laboratory
at 24 °C, 12 h day night cycle and fed on chick peas twice daily.
The mice were anaesthetized before being sacrificed. Extraction
of the digestive enzymes from mouse was done following the
8
reported procedure of Rao et al. The abdomen was opened and
the duodenum and a part of the proximal ileum was removed
under sterile condition and kept in 0.05 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 9)
at 4 °C for immediate processing. The alimentary canal was slit
opened and washed with 0.05 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 9) to recover