H. Li et al.
Phytochemistry Letters 27 (2018) 229–233
displayed any appreciable level of cytotoxicity when evaluated against
the HEK 293 cell line. This structure activity relationship is in ac-
cordance with previous findings (D’Arcy et al., 1987; Inbaraj and
Chignell, 2004; Klaus et al., 2010; Klotz et al., 2014), and, given that
both 1 and 5 are C-2 methyl substituted, it would follow that the me-
chanism of cytotoxicity exhibited in the HEK 293 cells is predominantly
redox-based rather than a consequence of Michael-type alkylation of
nucleophilic cellular targets (Inbaraj and Chignell, 2004; Kumagai
et al., 2012). The marked difference observed in our bioassay data
therefore suggests that the antimycobacterial activity of the naptho-
quinones isolated from M. uniflora is being elicited through a more
specific mechanism of action such as DNA gyrase inhibition (Karkare
et al., 2013) that may warrant further in-depth study.
(23 mg) and 2 (6 mg). The CH
Sephadex LH-20 (1:1 CH Cl
portion of fraction D (47 of 72 mg) was subjected to normal phase
HPLC (17:3 hexane/EtOAc) to obtain 4 (12 mg). A portion of fraction
(30 of 85 mg) was subjected to normal phase HPLC (33: 17 hexane/
EtOAc) to give 6 (5 mg) and 7 (9 mg). A portion of the EtOAc fraction
(176 of 712 mg) was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 (1:1 CH Cl /MeOH)
resulting ten fractions (E – E10). Fraction E (20 mg) was subjected to
O) to obtain 5 (11 mg).
2
Cl
2
fraction (654 mg) was subjected to
2
2 1
/MeOH) to give ten fractions (D – D10). A
7
D
8
2
2
1
4
reverse phase HPLC (17:33 MeOH/H
2
3.3.1. Chimaphilin (1)
Yellow needles; IR (thin film) νmax 2956, 2924, 1667, 1599,
−
1 1
1298 cm ; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
7
3
) δ 7.93 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-5),
.87 (dq, 1.8, 0.6 Hz, 1H, H-8), 7.50 (ddq, J = 7.9, 1.8, 0.7 Hz, 1H, H-
3
. Experimental
6), 6.79 (q, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, H-3), 2.48 (bs, 3H, 7-Me), 2.17 (d,
J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, 2-Me), consistent with literature values (Kosuge et al.,
1985; Saxena et al., 1995, 1996); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
) δ 186.0
s, C-1), 185.1 (s, C-4), 148.0 (s, C-2), 144.8 (s,C-7), 135.8 (d, C-3),
3.1. General experimental procedures
3
(
All solvents for extraction and fractionation were purchased from
134.5 (d, C-6), 132.2 (s, C-8a), 130.2 (s, C-4a), 127.0 (d, C-5), 126.4 (d,
C-8), 22.0 (q, 7-Me), 16.6 (q, 2-Me), data were consistent with literature
Fisher Scientific (Ottawa, ON, Canada). NMR solvents were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Flash chromatography was
performed using a Biotage Flash + chromatography system on KP-Sil
values (Kagawa et al., 1992; Kosuge et al., 1985; Saxena et al., 1995,
1996); ESIHRMS m/z 187.0755 (M + H+), calcd for (C12
H
11
O
2
+ H ),
+
25 + S silica cartridges (40 − 63 μm, 60 Å) and size exclusion chro-
187.0759.
matography was performed with Sephdex LH-20 (25–100 μm). Semi-
preparative normal phase HPLC was performed on a Waters 510 pump,
a Waters R401 refractive index detector and a Phenomenex Luna silica
column (250 × 10 mm, 10 u, 100 Å) at a flow rate of 4.0 mL/min.
Optical rotations were determined on a Rudolph autopol III polarimeter
at 589 nm using a 5 cm sample cell. IR spectra were recorded on a
Perkin Elmer Spectrum Two FT-IR spectrometer as thin films on a so-
dium chloride disk. NMR spectra were recorded on an Agilent 400-MR
3.3.2. 3-Hydroxychimaphilin (2)
Yellow needles; IR (thin film) ν
max
3364, 2919, 2850, 1698,
−
1 1
1646 cm ; H NMR (CDCl ) δ 7.94 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H-5), 7.90 (dq,
3
1.7, 0.6 Hz, 1H, H-8), 7.45 ((ddq, J = 7.8, 1.7, 0.7 Hz, 1H, H-6), 7.35
(bs, 1H, 3-OH), 2.48 (bs, 3H, 7-Me), 2.08 (s, 3H, 2-Me), consistent with
literature values (Saxena et al., 1995, 1996);13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl ) δ 185.4 (s, C-1), 181.0 (s, C-4) 153.3 (s, C-3), 146.4 (s, C-7),
3
DD2 instrument in CDCl
protonated solvent resonances (δ
9.000, respectively). HRMS was recorded on a Thermo LTQ Exactive
3
or CD
3
OD and were calibrated to residual
133.6 (d, C-6), 133.0 (s, C-8a), 127.4 (d, C-8), 127.2 (s, C-4a), 126.5 (d,
H
7.260 and 3.310; δ 77.160 and
C
C-5), 120.2 (s, C-2), 22.2 (q, 7-Me) 8.8 (q, 2-Me), consistent with lit-
4
erature values (Saxena et al., 1995, 1996); ESIHRMS m/z 203.0704 (M
+
+
instrument with an ESI source. Antimycobacterial susceptibility tests
were performed using modified Middlebrook 7H9 broth base (BBL™
MGIT™, Becton Dickinson, Mississauga, Ontario) in non-tissue culture
treated, low-binding, black 96-well microtitre plates sealed with
polyester films (50 μm). Fluorometric readings (in relative fluorescence
units, RFU) were recorded using a Molecular Devices Gemini EM dual-
scanning microplate spectrofluorometer with a 530 nm excitation filter
and a 590 nm emission filter operating in top-scan mode.
+ H ), calcd for (C12H11O3 + H ), 203.0708.
3.3.3. 5,8-Dihydro-3-hydroxychimaphilin (4)
Orange needles; IR (thin film) ν
max
3392, 2898, 1652, 1383,
−
1
1
13
1355 cm
; H and C NMR see Table 1; ESIHRMS m/z 227.0679
(M + Na+), calcd for (C12H12O3 + Na ), 227.0684.
+
3.3.4. 4-Hydroxy-2,7-dimethylnaphthylene-1-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (5)
2
5
D
Purple amorphous solid; [α] = –9.2 (c 0.8, MeOH); IR (thin film)
−
1
1
13
3.2. Plant material
νmax 3353, 2923, 1660, 1294, 1075 cm ; H and C NMR see Table 2;
+
+
ESIHRMS m/z 373.1258 (M + Na ), calcd for (C18
H
22
O
7
+ Na ),
Whole plants of M. uniflora were collected by hand from Saint
373.1263.
Léonard, New Brunswick, Canada (47°16.024′ N, 67°43.874′ W) in
October 2013. The whole plants were washed with water to remove
debris, freeze dried and stored at –20℃. Species identification was
confirmed by Dr. Stephen Clayden (New Brunswick Museum
Herbarium; voucher number NBM VP-37097).
3.3.5. Isofraxetin (6)
White needles; IR (thin film) ν
max
3345, 2927, 1692, 1582,
−
1 1
1121 cm
; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) δ 7.61 (d, J = 9.5, 1H, H-4),
3
6.53 (s, 1H, H-8), 6.28 (d, J = 9.5, 1H, H-3) 3.94 (s, 3H, 7-OMe),
consistent with literature values (Artem’eva et al., 1973a; Artem’eva
1
3
.3. Extraction and isolation
et al., 1973b); H NMR (400 MHz, CD
6
3
OD) δ 7.83 (d, J = 9.4, 1H, H-4),
.71 (s, 1H, H-8), 6.21 (d, J = 9.4, 1H, H-3) 3.89 (s, 3H, 7-OMe),
consistent with literature values (Zhou et al., 2017);
1
3
The freeze dried M. uniflora (16 g) was ground to a powder and
C NMR
exhaustively extracted in MeOH for 8 h using a Soxhlet apparatus to
obtain crude extract (5.5 g) that exhibited significant anti-
mycobacterial activity and was subjected to bioassay-guided fractio-
nation. A portion of the crude extract (4.4 g) was fractionated using a
modified Kupchan solvent-solvent partition to give five fractions (Li
(100 MHz, CD OD, assignments marked with asterisks may be inter-
3
a
changed) δ 163.7 (s, C-2), 147.1 (s, C-7), 146.7 (d, C-4), 140.7 (s, C-
* *
8a ), 140.6 (s, C-5 ), 134.1 (s, C-6), 112.7 (d, C-3), 112.2 (s, C-4a),
+
101.1 (d, C-8), 56.8 (q, 7-OMe); ESIHRMS m/z 209.0445 (M + H ),
+
calcd for (C10
H
9
O
5
+ H ), 209.0450.
2 2
et al., 2012). The antimycobacterial hexane, CH Cl and EtOAc frac-
tions were further separated to obtain pure compounds. The hexane
fraction (511 mg) was subjected to silica flash column chromatography
eluting from 100% hexanes to 100% EtOAc with 10% increment re-
3.3.6. Umbelliferone (7)
Yellow needles; IR (thin film) νmax 3171, 1687, 1610, 1131 cm ; H
NMR (400 MHz, CD
J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-5), 6.79 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H, H-6), 6.70 (bd,
J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, H-8), 6.18 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, H-3), consistent with
−
1 1
3
OD) δ 7.84 (bd, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, H-4), 7.44 (d,
sulting eight fractions (H
1
- H
8
). A portion of fraction H
3
(46 of 93 mg)
was subjected to normal phase HPLC (9:1 hexane/EtOAc) to obtain 1
231