regioselectivity control in radiation-induced reaction using the
b-CD restricted nanospace. These results should provide a
breakthrough in finding useful high sensitive and selective
radiation-induced reactions for nanolithography and nanofabrica-
tion by reaction-field control. Further studies on the EB-induced
reactions in a restricted matrix are underway.
Notes and references
1
(a) J. R. Sheats and B. W. Smith, Microlithography, Science and
Technology, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998; (b) K. Suzuki, S. Matsui
and Y. Ochiai, Sub-Half-Micron Lithography for ULSIs, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2000; (c) G. M. Wallraff and
W. D. Hinsberg, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 1801; (d) H. G. Craighead,
Science, 2000, 290, 1532; and references therein; (e) H. Namatsu,
Y. Watanabe, K. Yamazaki, T. Yamaguchi, M. Nagase, Y. Ono,
A. Fujiwara and S. Horiguchi, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B, 2003, 21, 1; (f)
A. Dutta, S. P. Lee, Y. Hayafune and S. Oda, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B,
Fig. 3 Proposed mechanism of the EB-Fries rearrangement of sulfona-
mide and sulfonate within b-CD inclusion complexes: (a)–(c) BSA/b-CD,
(d) TSA/b-CD and PTS/b-CD.
2000, 18, 2857.
2
3
(a) Y. Tabata, Y. Ito and S. Tagawa, CRC Handbook of Radiation
Chemistry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1991; (b) J. W. T. Spinks and
R. J. Woods, An Introduction to Radiation Chemistry, Wiley, New York,
which aids the escape of anilino radicals from the cage of b-CD.
These results show that b-CD as a restricted nanospace has a large
effect on the EB-Fries rearrangement, suggesting that other EB-
induced reactions could also be controlled by appropriate choice of
reaction spaces.
1990; (c) Farhataziz and M. A. J. Rodgers, Radiation Chemistry,
Principles and Applications, VCH Publishers, New York, 1987.
(a) Y. Maekawa, T. Inaba, H. Hobo, T. Narita, H. Koshikawa,
S. Moon, J. Kato and M. Yoshida, Chem. Commun., 2002, 2088; (b)
K. Yuasa, K. Enomoto, Y. Maekawa, J. Kato, T. Yamashita and
M. Yoshida, J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol., 2004, 17, 21.
J. Kato, Y. Maekawa and M. Yoshida, Chem. Lett., 2005, 34, 266.
(a) J. Kato, K. Yuasa, H. Matsushita, Y. Maekawa, K. Enomoto,
T. Ishii, K. Itoh and T. Yamashita, J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol., 2006,
The proposed mechanism of the EB-Fries rearrangement of
b-CD inclusion complexes is shown in Fig. 3. This reaction
proceeds through two radicals generated by the homolytic cleavage
at the S–X bond via ionization/excitation by radiation, in analogy
with the photo-Fries rearrangement. There are two possibilities for
the directions of the guest molecules in the b-CD cavity; namely
the aniline group (a) or the benzenesulfonyl group (b, c) is included
in the b-CD cavity. In the former case (a), benzenesulfonyl radical,
which is produced by EB-induced scission of the S–N bond,
cannot attack the anilino radical residue because both para- and
ortho-positions are sterically blocked by b-CD. On the other hand,
the anilino radical in (c) can be attacked by the sulfonyl radical in
b-CD at the wider open end of the b-CD to give a preferentially
para-substituted one due to the steric hindrance with b-CD in (b).
Since TSA and PTS with a methyl group are included shallowly in
the b-CD cavity owing to the methyl group as shown in (d), para-
selectivity should be smaller than that of BSA/b-CD. The depth of
inclusion can also be understood by the magnitude of the high-
field shift of the inner H-5 proton of the b-CD moiety upon
4
5
19, 105; (b) H. Onozeki, J. Kato, Y. Maekawa, Y. Muroya,
Y. Katsumura and T. Yamashita, Proc. of the 9th International
Conference on Radiation Curing (RadTech Asia ’03), 2003, 618.
(a) H.-P. Brack, C. Padeste, M. Slaski, S. Alkan and H. H. Solak, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 1004; (b) P. Krsko, S. Sukhishvili, M. Mansfield,
R. Clancy and M. Libera, Langmuir, 2003, 19, 5618; (c) S. Uchino,
J. Yamamoto, S. Migitaka, K. Kojima, M. Hashimoto and H. Shiraishi,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B, 1998, 16, 3684; (d) J. Fujita, Y. Ohnishi,
S. Manako, Y. Ochiai, E. Nomura, T. Sakamoto and S. Matsui, Jpn. J.
Appl. Phys., Part 1, 1997, 36, 7769.
6
7 J. Szejtli, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1743.
8
M. L. Bender and M. Komiyama, Cyclodextrin Chemistry, Springer-
Verlag, New York, 1978.
K. Takahashi, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 2013; and references therein.
9
1
0 (a) M. Ohara and K. Watanabe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1975, 14,
820; (b) R. Ch eˆ nevert and R. Plante, Can. J. Chem., 1983, 61, 1092; (c)
M. S. Syamala, B. Nageswer Rao and V. Ramamurthy, Tetrahedron,
1988, 44, 7234; (d) K. Pitchumani, M. C. Durai Manickam and
C. Srinivasan, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 2975.
11 H.-J. Schneider, F. Hacket, V. Rudiger and H. Ikeda, Chem. Rev., 1998,
98, 1755.
1
complexation in the H NMR spectra (Fig. S1{).
In conclusion, EB irradiation of an inclusion complex BSA/
b-CD induced the Fries rearrangement under a constrained
environment which led to changes in reaction rate and selectivity.
To the best of our knowledge this is the first example of
12 (a) M. S. Matheson, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1962, 13, 77; (b) M. Burton
and W. N. Patrick, J. Phys. Chem., 1954, 58, 421; (c) P. J. Dyne and
J. Denhartog, Nature, 1964, 202, 1105; (d) J. F. Merklin and S. Lipsky,
J. Phys. Chem., 1964, 68, 3297.
4
500 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 4498–4500
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006