´
P. Erdelyi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16 (2008) 5322–5330
5329
repeated with the medium and high amount of com-
pounds (Fig. 14).
fractometers, Philipps-Universita¨t Marburg, Germany.
The structure was elucidated by SHELXS: Sheldrick,
G. M. SHELXS-97, Program for Crystal Structure
Solution, University of Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
Structure refinement was carried out by Sheldrick, G.
M. SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refine-
ment, University of Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
5.9. Synthetic procedure for compound 3a
1H NMR spectra were obtained on a Varian Unity Ino-
va 300 spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in
parts per million relative to TMS as internal standard.
MS spectra were measured on Finnigan Mat 95 SQ
and 95 XP devices.
A plate-like single crystal of 3aÆH2O was selected for X-
ray crystal structure determination. A crystal of
FT_WA was mounted on a glass fiber. Cell parameters
were determined by least-squares of the setting angles
of 25 (20.24 6 h 6 24.36ꢁ) reflections. Crystal data:
C16H16N2O5S, Fwt: 348.37, colorless, plate, size:
0.22 · 0.11 · 0.09 mm, monoclinic, space groupP21/c,
5.9.1. 4-(5-Methyl-3-phenylisoxazol-4-yl)benzenesulfonyl
chloride (2a). Compound 1 (8.00 g, 34.0 mmol) was
added to chlorosulfonic acid (22.6 mL, 340 mmol) at
5 ꢁC in small portions over 30 min and the mixture
was left to stand for 5 h at room temperature. The con-
version was followed by TLC: toluene/EtOAc 12:1.
After the completion of the reaction, the mixture was
poured into crushed ice and the resulting aqueous sus-
pension was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 · 90 mL). The
combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried
over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in
vacuo to give a crude product. Recrystallization from
cyclohexane to remove meta-isomer (2b) provided the
pure ortho-sulfonyl chloride 2a (7.26 g, 64%). TLC: tol-
uene/EtOAc 12:1, silica, Rf = 0.55. MS (EI) M+ = 333,
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 ꢁC) d 7.71–7.64
(m, 2H); 7.49–7.34 (m, 5H); 7.24–7.17 (m, 2H); 2.45 (s,
3H) ppm.
˚
˚
˚
a = 7.659(1) A, b = 23.510(1) A, c = 9.148(1) A, a = 90ꢁ,
3
˚
b = 95.65(1)ꢁ, c = 90ꢁ, V = 1639.2(3) A , T = 295(2) K,
Z = 4,
F(000) = 728,
Dx = 1.412 mg/m3,
l = 2.022 mmꢁ1. Intensity data were collected on a En-
raf-Nonius CAD4 diffractometer (graphite monochro-
mator; Cu-Ka radiation, k = 1.54184 A) at 295(2) K in
˚
the range 3.76 6 h 6 75.58ꢁ using x/2h scans. The inten-
sities of three standard reflections were monitored regu-
larly (every 60 min). The intensities of the standard
reflections remained constant within experimental error
throughout the data collection. A total of 3655 reflec-
tions were collected of which 3344 were unique
[R(int) = 0.0077, R(r) = 0.0528]; intensities of 2021
reflections were greater than 2r(I), completeness to
h = 0.981. No absorption correction was applied to the
data. The structure was solved by direct methods (and
subsequent difference syntheses). Anisotropic full-matrix
least-squares refinement on F2 for all non-hydrogen
atoms yielded R1 = 0.0406 for 2029 [I > 2r(I)] and
R1 = 0.0855 and wR2 = 0.1089 for all (3352) intensity
data. The maximum and minimum residual electron
density in the final difference map were 0.25 and
5.9.2. N-Hydroxy-4-(5-methyl-3-phenylisoxazol-4-yl)ben-
zenesulfonamide monohydrate (3aÆH2O). A suspension of
hydroxylamine hydrochloride (6.88 g, 99.0 mmol) in
dioxane (50 mL) was added to a solution of sodium ace-
tate (8.12 g, 99.0 mmol) in water (25 mL). To this mix-
ture, compound 2a (11.0 g, 33.0 mmol) in dioxane
(50 mL) was added at 10 ꢁC dropwise, over a period of
30 min and it was then stirred for additional 30 min at
room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted
with water (500 mL) and shaken for 2 h. The suspension
was filtered off, the filtrate was dissolved in EtOAc
(200 mL), extracted with an aqueous solution (40 mL)
of 5 m/m% Na2EDTA, with water (40 mL) and finally
with brine (20 mL) and evaporated in vacuo. The resi-
due was dissolved in EtOH (90 mL), decolorized by acti-
vated carbon (1 g), filtered, and water (270 mL)
containing ascorbic acid (3 g) was added to the solution
at 60 ꢁC. The mixture was cooled to 5 ꢁC, the precipitate
formed was collected by filtration, washed with water
and dried to provide the title compound 3aÆH2O
ꢁ3
˚
ꢁ0.26 e A
. The weighting scheme applied was
2
w ¼ 1=½r2ðF 2oÞ þ ð0:055PÞ þ 0:0000Pꢃ
where
P ¼ ðF 2o þ 2F 2cÞ=3. Hydrogen atomic positions were cal-
culated from assumed geometries except –OH and –NH
H atoms that were located in difference maps. Hydrogen
atoms were included in structure factor calculations but
they were not refined. The isotropic displacement
parameters of the hydrogen atoms were approximated
from the U(eq) value of the atom they were bonded to.23
Acknowledgments
1
(7.80 g, 68%). Mp 95–110 ꢁC. MS (EI) M+ = 330, H
We thank Drs. Gabor Tarkanyi and Tamas Gati for the
measurements and elucidations of the NMR spectra. We
´
´
´
´
´
NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 ꢁC) d 9.66 (s, 2H);
7.87–7.80 (m, 2H); 7.50–7.32 (m, 7H); 2.49 (s, 3H) ppm.
´
also thank Sandor Levai for his contribution to the sta-
bility assays and HPLC measurements.
´
5.10. Crystal structure determination of 3aÆH2O
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for
the structure in this paper have been deposited with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supple-
mentary publication No. CCDC 660035.
References and notes
1. Vane, J. R. Nature (New Biol.) 1971, 231, 232.
2. Raz, A.; Wyche, A.; Siegel, N.; Needleman, P. J. Biol.
Chem. 1988, 263, 3022.
Data reduction was obtained from Harms, K. (1996)
XCAD4 Data Reduction Programme for CAD4 Dif-
3. Fu, J. R.; Masferrer, J. L.; Seibert, K.; Raz, A.; Needle-
man, P. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 16737.