894
Transition Met Chem (2015) 40:891–897
oxo ligands and assisted by electrostatic repulsion. The
angles involving both the oxo and phenolate oxygens differ
significantly from the ideal 90°/180° (Table 3), possibly
also because of electrostatic repulsion. The smallest angle
between the cis-positioned donor atoms is N2–Mo1–N1 at
76.2(4)°. This also results in values of the C–N–Mo angles
involving the carbon atoms of the central bridge (C8 and
C10) which are significantly smaller than those involving
the imine C7 or C11 values.
Table 4 Catalytic oxidation of cyclooctene at room temperature
No.
Catalyst
Oxidant
Conversion (%)
1
2
3
None
H2O2
None
H2O2
0
0
MoO2L
MoO2L
100
Reaction conditions: catalyst (0.04 mmol), alkene (0.4 mmol), H2O2
(25 mmol). Reaction time 4 h
The geometry of the Schiff base ligand is typical for
such complexes. The imine bond lengths, C7–N1 1.284(15)
100
˚
and C11–N2 1.302(19) A, are similar to those reported
Ethanol
Methanol
Chloroform
80
60
40
20
0
previously [14] for other Schiff base ligands. The phenolate
O–C bonds are O3–C1 1.358(15) and O4–C17
˚
1.314(16) A. The Br1–C4 and Br2–C14 distances of
˚
1.926(14) and 1.931(13) A are typical for such bonds.
Further analysis revealed the effect of bromine substituents
on the geometry of the Schiff base phenyl rings. The bonds
involving C4 and C14 (Fig. 1) are among the shortest C–C
bonds in these rings. Also C3–C4–C5 and C13–C14–C15
angles both of 123.9(13)° are significantly larger than those
in the rest of the rings.
0
1
2
3
4
Time (h)
Fig. 2 Effect of various solvents on the epoxidation of cyclooctene
with H2O2 catalyzed by MoO2L. Reaction conditions: cyclooctene
(0.4 mmol), catalyst (0.04 mmol), solvent (3 mL), H2O2 (2 mL);
reflux
The central bridge of the Schiff base ligand is defined by
torsion angles C7–N1–C8–C9 -115.5(13), N1–C8–C9–
C10 -45.8(16), C8–C9–C10–N2 -25.0(16) and C9–C10–
N2–C11 -94.4(14)°, which are different from those
reported for the dimethoxy analog MoO2{salnptn(3-
OMe)2} [14]. The torsion angles N1–C7–C6–C1 and N2–
C11–C12–C17 of 10.0(19) and -20(2), respectively,
indicate significant differences in the positions of the
phenyl ring relative to the central N1–Mo1–N2 moiety.
The dihedral angle between the best planes of the two
phenyl rings in the ligand is 69.5(8)°. As a result, the six-
membered chelate rings Mo1–O3–C1–C6–C7–N1, Mo1–
O4–C17–C12–C11–N2 and Mo1–N1–C8–C9–C10–N2
reveal conformations of twist boat, screw boat and twist
boat, respectively. The steric strain within the complex
results in significant displacement of the central Mo1 from
the best planes of the phenyl rings, being 0.609(1) and
100
0.02 mmol
0.04 mmol
0.06 mmol
80
60
40
20
0
1
2
3
4
Time (h)
Fig. 3 Influence of catalyst concentration on the oxidation of
cyclooctene. Reaction conditions: cyclooctene (0.4 mmol), ethanol
(3 mL), H2O2 (2 mL); reflux
˚
-0.971(2) A for the C1–C6 and C12–C17 moieties,
respectively. The phenolic O atoms of the Schiff base
ligand form two longer bonds to Mo, with distances of
˚
1.916(9) and 2.109(9) A for Mo1–O3 and Mo1–O4,
respectively.
The pairs of torsion angles N1–C8–C9–C18 -164.0(12)
and N1–C8–C9–C19 76.2(15), and C18–C9–C10–N2
90.9(14) and C19–C9–C10–N2 -147.0(13) indicate that
the position of the gem-dimethyl group at C9 is not sym-
metric relative to the central bridge, resulting in an
respectively. The longest bonds are formed by the N atoms
of the Schiff base, the Mo1–N2 and Mo1–N1 distances
˚
being 2.155(10) and 2.334(10) A, respectively. The dif-
˚
ferences observed for these pairs of bonds can be attributed
to the trans effects of the oxo ligands positioned opposite
to O4 and N1 in the coordination sphere. The O2–Mo1–O1
angle between the oxo ligands is 104.1(5)°, larger than the
values reported previously for similar cis-dioxomolybde-
num complexes reported previously [14]. This might be
related to the relatively short Mo–O bonds formed by the
intramolecular C18…C11 contact of 3.44(3) A but a lack
of such contact for the C19 methyl group.
For the suggested mechanism of catalytic olefin epoxi-
dation, access to the oxo ligands followed by formation of
a hepta-coordinated Mo intermediate seems to be important
[15–17]. The analysis of the intramolecular contacts reveal
that O1 forms such contacts with C1, C10 and H10A, the
123