7
28
H. V. Nguyen et al.
LETTER
Synthesis of 2
A mixture of ferrocenyltributyltin, (0.440 g, 0.92 mmol) and 4
0.140 g, 0.42 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (4 mL). To this was
added CsF (0.256 g, 1.69 mmol), PdCl (3 mg, 17 mmol), P(t-Bu)
References and Notes
8
(
1) For reviews on achiral 4-aminopyridine nucleophilic
catalysts, see: (a) Scriven, E. F. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1983,
2, 129. (b) Grondal, C. Synlett 2003, 1568. (c) Murugan,
(
2
3
1
(
0.32 mL of 0.052 M solution in dioxane, 17 mmol), and CuI (6.4
mg, 34 mmol). The mixture was heated under nitrogen for 15 h at
00 °C. To the cooled reaction mixture was added CH Cl (30 mL)
R.; Scriven, E. F. V. Aldrichimica Acta 2003, 36, 21.
2) For reviews on chiral 4-aminopyridine nucleophilic
catalysts, see: (a) Fu, G. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 542.
(b) Spivey, A. C.; Maddaford, A.; Redgrave, A. Org. Prep.
Proced. Int. 2000, 32, 331. (c) Connon, S. J. Lett. Org.
Chem. 2006, 3, 333.
(
1
2
2
and H O (10 mL). After vigorous shaking, the mixture was filtered
2
®
through Celite washing with a CH Cl –EtOAc mixture. The or-
2
2
ganic layer was separated, dried (MgSO ) and the solvent removed
4
in vacuo. Column chromatography (SiO , 2% MeOH–CH Cl ) gave
2
2
2
(3) Nguyen, H. V.; Butler, D. C. D.; Richards, C. J. Org. Lett.
2
1
as an orange crystalline solid (0.186 g, 82% yield), mp 193–
96 °C. Anal. Calcd for C H Fe N ·0.25H O: C, 67.85; H, 5.97;
2006, 8, 769.
3
1
32
2
2
2
2
0
(4) (a) Whitesell, J. K. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1581. (b) Najdi,
S.; Kurth, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3279.
N, 5.10. Found: C, 67.81; H, 5.99; N, 4.86. [a]D –88 (c 0.105,
MeOH). H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl ): d = 0.69 (6 H, d, J = 6.0 Hz,
1
3
(
(
5) (a) Naraku, G.; Shimomoto, N.; Hanamoto, T.; Inanaga, J.
Enantiomer 2000, 5, 135. (b) Spivey, A. C.; Maddaford, A.;
Fekner, T.; Redgrave, A. J.; Frampton, C. S. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3460.
2
2
4
ꢀ CH ), 1.13–1.18 (2 H, m, 2 ꢀ CHH), 1.68–1.80 (2 H, m,
3
ꢀ CHH), 3.08–3.14 (2 H, m, 2 ꢀ CH), 4.17 (10 H, s, 2 ꢀ C H ),
5
5
.20 (2 H, s, Fc), 4.27 (2 H, s, Fc), 4.41 (4 H, s, Fc), 8.85 (2 H, br s,
13
1
py). C{ H} NMR (68 MHz, CDCl ): d = 21.4 (CH ), 34.2 (CH ),
3
3
2
6) Lieser, J. K. Synth. Commun. 1983, 13, 765.
5
5.3 (CH), 67.8 (Fc), 67.9 (Fc), 70.0 (Fc), 70.1 (Fc), 71.3 (Fc), 86.6
+
(7) Canibano, V.; Rodríguez, J. F.; Santos, M.; Sanz-Tejedor,
M. A.; Carreno, M. C.; González, G.; García-Ruano, J. L.
Synthesis 2001, 2175.
(py), 129.5 (py), 152.8 (py). HRMS (ES ): m/z C H Fe N :
31 33 2 2
+
5
45.1337; found: 545.1338 [MH ].
(
(
8) Guillaneux, D.; Kagan, H. B. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2502.
9) Mee, S. P. H.; Lee, V.; Baldwin, J. E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Representative Method of Alcohol Acetylation
-Phenylethanol 5 (0.148 mL, 1.23 mmol) was dissolved in toluene
2.46 mL), followed by the addition of 2 (3.3 mg, 6 mmol) and
1
(
2004, 43, 1132.
(
(
10) Nguyen, H. V.; Motevalli, M.; Richards, C. J. manuscript in
preparation.
11) Crystal data of 2.
Hünig’s base (0.15 mL, 0.86 mmol). The reaction vessel was cooled
to –40 °C and to this was added Ac O (0.08 mL, 0.85 mmol). The
2
reaction mixture was stirred and maintained at –40 °C for 24 h. Af-
ter quenching with MeOH (10 mL), the solvent was removed in vac-
C H Cl Fe N , M = 663.65, orthorhombic, a = 7.3563(2),
32 33
3
2
2
1
b = 17.9280(6), c = 21.8849(7) Å, a = 90°, b = 90°, g = 90°,
uo and H NMR was used to determine the level of conversion [9:
3
V = 2886.26(15) Å , space group P2 2 2 , Z = 4, D = 1.527
CH(CH )OH = 4.85 ppm, 10: CH(CH )OAc = 5.86 ppm]. The
1
1
1
c
3
3
3
–1
mg/m , m = 1.309 mm , reflections measured 21200,
product 9 was isolated by column chromatography (SiO , 25%
2
reflections unique 6560 with R = 0.0495, T = 120 (2) K,
EtOAc–PE (40–60), changing the solvent mixture to 2% MeOH–
CH Cl led to recovery of the catalyst), and the ee was determined
int
2
2
final R indices [F >2s(F )] R1 = 0.0370, wR2 = 0.0670 and
for all data R1 = 0.0457, wR2 = 0.0701 (CCDC 619938).
12) Hassner, A.; Krepski, L. R.; Alexanian, V. Tetrahedron
2
2
by gas chromatography (Chirasil-Dex CB 25 m ꢀ 0.25 mm), start-
ing temperature 80 °C, initial time 1 min, rate 1 °C/min, final tem-
(
(
1978, 34, 2069.
perature 180 °C, final time 10 min;. t = 42.27 min (R)-9 and 44.28
R
13) Toluene has frequently been found to be one of the best
solvents for this reaction, for example see: (a) Ruble, J. C.;
Tweddell, J.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2794.
(b) Priem, G.; Pelotier, B.; Macdonald, S. J. F.; Anson, M.
S.; Campbell, I. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3844.
min (S)-9.
Acknowledgment
We thank the EPSRC for financial support (HVN) and the EPSRC
National Crystallography Service (Southampton University) for
data collection.
(
14) (a) Spivey, A. C.; Arseniyadis, S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 5436. (b) Xu, S.; Held, I.; Kempf, B.; Mayr, H.;
Steglich, W.; Zipse, H. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 4751.
Synlett 2007, No. 5, 725–728 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York