O
S
H
H
N
N
N
R2
Cl
R2
O
O
N
S
N
S
S
i
ii
O
O
iii
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
NH
R3
H
O
NO2
R2
NH
R1
NH2
NO2
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
, R1 = H; R2 = Me; R3 = Ph (77%)
, R1 = R2 =Me; R3 = Ph (75%)
, R1 = H; R2 = Me; R3 = 1-Naphthyl (68%)
, R1 = R2 = Me; R3 = 1-Naphthyl (69%)
, R1 = H; R2 = Me; R3 = Benzhydryl (84%)
, R1 = R2 = Me; R3 = Benzhydryl (81%)
10a
10b
10c
10d
, R2 = Ph (85%)
, R2= 1-Naphthyl (82%)
, R2= Benzhydryl (80%)
11a
11b
11c
11d
, R2= Ph (91%)
, R2= 1-Naphthyl (94%)
, R2= Benzhydryl (91%)
, R2= Bis(3,5-trifluoromethyl) (76%)
, R2= Bis(3,5-trifluoromethyl) (90%)
4f
4g
4h
, R1 = H R2 = Me; R3 = Bis(3,5-trifluoromethyl) (68%)
, R1 = R2 = Me; R3 = Bis(3,5-trifluoromethyl) (66%)
o
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) 9a/9b/9c/9d, DIEA, DCM, rt, 3 h; (ii) SnCl2.2 H2O, 55 C, 6 h; (iii) (a) Cbz-Ala-OH/Cbz-NMe-Ala-
OH, ClCOOEt, Et3N, THF, reflux, 24 h; (b) HBr in AcOH, rt, 20 mins.
Table 1. In vitro Cytotoxicity against human breast cancer cell line
MDA-MB-231
Acknowledgments
Sr.
No.
Sr.
No.
Compnd IC50 (μM)
Compnd IC50 (μM)
S.B.B, M.A.W. and D. P. are thankful to CSIR, New Delhi for
research fellowships. GJS thanks BSC0120 drug discovery
program (CSIR, New Delhi) for funding.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AVPIa
3a
80.6±5.2
>100
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
3j
17.5±1.2
>100
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
3b
3c
>100
>100
Supplementary Material
>100
>100
Full experimental procedures, characterization data, HR-MS,
3d
3e
>100
36.5±1.5
82.6±2.6
35.8±2.4
67.8±3.5
31.5±1.6
1
IR, H and 13C NMR spectra for all compounds. Supplementary
data associated with this article can be found, in the online
version.
82.5±2.7
>100
3f
4. References
3g
78.5±3.4
32.5±0.5
>100
4g
4h
1.
2.
3.
Tsuruo, T.; Naito, M.; Tomida, A.; Fujita, N., Mashima, T.;
Sakamoto, H. Haga, N. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94, 15-21.
(a) Martin, S. J. Cell 2002, 109, 793-796. (b) Verhagen, A. M.;
Vaux, D. L. Apoptosis 2002, 7, 163-166.
Takahashi, R.; Deveraux, Q. L.; Tamm, I.; Welsh, K.; Munt, A.
N.; Salvesen, G. S.; Reed, J. C. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 7787-
7790.
3h
3i
a AVPI – Smac tetrapeptide was synthesized and used as a positive control for
the comparison.
4.
5.
Ekert, P. G.; Silke, J.; Hawkins, C. J.; Verhagen, A. M.; Vaux, D.
L. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 152, 483-490.
Verhagen, A. M.; Ekert, P. G.; Pakusch, M.; Silke, J.; Connolly,
L. M.; Reid, G. E.; Moritz, R. L.; Simpson, R. J.; Vaux, D. L.
Cell, 2000, 102, 43-53.
Liu, Z.; Sun, C.; Olejniczak, E. T.; Meadows, R. P.; Betz, S. F.;
Oost, T.; Herrmann, J.; Wu, J. C.; Fesik, S. K. Nature 2000, 408,
1004-1008.
(a) Chauhan, D.; Neri,P.; Velankar, M.; Podar, K.; Hideshima, T.;
Fulciniti, M.; Tassone, P.; Raje, N.; Mitsiades, C.; Mitsiades, N.;
Richardson, P.; Zawel, L.; Tran, M.; Munshi, N.; Anderson, K. C.
Blood 2007, 109, 1220-1227. (b) Liu, N.; Tao, Z.; Le Blanc, J. M.;
Zaorsky, N. G.; Sun, Y.; Vuagniaux, G.; Dicker, A. P.; Lu, B. Am.
J. Cancer Res. 2014, 4, 943-951. (c) Flygare, J. A.; Beresini, M.;
Budha, N.; Chan, H.; Chan, I. T.; Cheeti, S.; Cohen, F.; Deshayes,
K.; Doerner, K.; Eckhardt, S. G.; Elliott, L. O.; Feng, B.; Franklin,
M. C.; Reisner, S. F.; Gazzard, L.; Halladay, J.; Hymowitz, S. G.;
La, H.; LoRusso, P.; Maurer, B.; Murray, L.; Plise, E.; Quan, C.;
Stephan, J. P.; Shin, Y. G.; Tom, J.; Tsui, V.; Um, J.;
Varfolomeev, E.; Vucic, D.; Wagner, A. J.; Wallweber, H. J. A.;
Wang, L.; Ware, J.; Wen, Z.; Wong, H.; Wong, J. M.; Wong, M.
Wong, S.; Yu, R.; Zobel, K.; Fairbrother W. J. J. Med. Chem.
2012, 55, 4101-4113. (d) Senzer, N. N.; LoRusso, P.; Martin, L.
P.; Schilder, R. J.; Amaravadi, R. K.; Papadopoulos, K. P.; Segota,
Z. E.; Weng, D. E.; Graham, M.; Adjei A. A. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013,
31, 3621-3628.
Compound 3j with N, N-dimethylation at N-terminus showed 4-
fold better activity than AVPI having IC50 value 17.5 μM. This
data suggested that N-methylated analogues 3h, 3j, 4d, 4f and 4h
showed more activity as compared to their free amine (NH2)
counterparts. Compounds having sulfonamide backbone (sAnt-
Pro) were relatively more active than carboxamide (Ant-Pro)
analogues, probably owing to their improved conformational
stability compared to their carboxamide counterparts. Indeed, this
has been observed in many bioactive molecules.16 Furthermore,
compounds having larger hydrophobic groups such as naphthyl,
benzhydril and bis(trifluoromethyl)aniline at C-terminus were
found to be more active than derivatives with phenyl group.
6.
7.
3. Conclusion
In summary, we have successfully synthesized 18 Smac
mimics, containing “Ant-Pro” and “sAnt-Pro” as reverse turn
inducing motifs. The synthesis of “Ant-Pro” containing mimics
has been carried out using benzoxazinone ring opening reaction,
while “sAnt-Pro”-tethered mimics have been synthesized via
standard coupling reaction. In vitro anticancer studies revealed
that most of the compounds show better activity than standard
AVPI tetrapeptide. Further studies are underway in refining the
structural features of the reverse-turn motifs embedded on the
Smac backbone with a view to improve bioactivity.
8.
9.
Sun, H.; Coleska, Z. N.; Lu, J.; Qiu, S.; Quin, D.; Yang, C. Y.;
Gao, W.; Meagher, J.; Stuckey, J.; Wang, S. J. Med. Chem. 2006,
49, 7916-7920.
Fandrich, M.; Fletcher, M. A.; Dobson, C. M. Nature 2001, 410,
165-166.