6
276 Deng et al.
Asian J. Chem.
methanol (30:70), 55 min, 214 nm, 1 mL/min]. LC/MS spectra
were recorded on an Agilent 6120 single quadrupole LC/MS
δ 22.5, 24.5, 25, 30, 32.3, 41.7, 46.5, 46.8, 47.1, 117.9, 164.5,
5
165; MS (m/z): 173.1 [M + 1] .
(
model G6120B) equipped with an Agilent C18 column, 50 ×
Preparation of 1-[[(3-hydroxytricyclo[3.3.1.1(3,7)]dec-
1-yl)amino]acetyl]-2-pyrrolidine carbonitrile (vildgliptin)
(1): 3-Aminoadamantanol (3 g,18 mmol), 2-butanone (21 mL),
potassium carbonate (10 g, 72.5 mmol) and potassium iodide
(0.25 g, 1.5 mmol) were added to a 150 mL three-neck round
bottom flask which was equipped with a condenser pipe, a
thermometer and a constant pressure funnel. The mixture was
heated to 40 °C under stirring and then the compound 4 (3 g,
16.5 mmol) dissolved in 22 mL THF was added dropwise for
1.5 h. After dropped over, the reaction mixture was stirred at
40 °C for 1 h and then heated up to reflux for 0.5 h. The reaction
2
.1 mm, 1.8 µm and a ESI (+) scan mode detector [buffer:
000 mL water with 1 mL formic acid, mobile phase, buffer:
1
acetonitrile (30:70), 20 min, 210 nm, 0.3 mL/min].
Preparation of 1-(2-chloroacetyl)-pyrrolidine-2-carbo-
xylic acid (3): The L-proline (10 g, 0.087mol) dissolved in
1
00 mL THF was added to a 250 mL three-neck round bottom
flask. Then chloroacetyl chloride (10.5 mL, 0.132 mol) was
added dropwise in ice-bath. The reaction mixture was refluxed
under stirring for 2.5 h and monitored by TLC (25 % MeOH-
2 2
CH Cl ).After completing the reaction, the mixture was cooled
to about 25 °C, diluted with 20 mL water and stirred for 15 min.
Then 20 mL saturated brine and 50 mL ethyl acetate were
added and the organic layer was collected. The aqueous layer
was re-extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). The combined
organic layers were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate for
3 2 2
was monitored by TLC (5 % CH OH-CH Cl ). After comple-
ting the reaction, the hot mixture was filtered and the filter
cake was washed with hot 2-butanone (3 × 20 mL). The collec-
ted filtrate was concentrated under vacuum and stirred under
slowly cooling.After the mixture became viscous, it was stirred
in the ice-bath. The resulting white crystalline solid was filtered
and washed with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL) and then dried at
45 °C under vacuum to afford the target compound of vildagliptin
(4.1 g, 82 %). HPLC purity 99.17 %, m.p. 148-150 °C, IR
2
4 h and then concentrated under vacuum. The semisolid
residue was stirred in 30 mL diisopropyl ether for 20 min at
about 25 °C and then cooled to 0 °C for 24 h to give crystalline
white solid which was filtered and washed with cold diiso-
propyl ether, then dried at 45 °C under vacuum to afford com-
-1
1
(KBr, νmax, cm ): 3293, 2915, 2848, 2241, 1656, 1405; H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d ) 1.41-1.49 (m, 14H, CH ), 1.97-2.02
(m, 2H, OH, NH), 3.44-3.63 (m, 2H, COCH ), 4.70-4.73 (t,
1H, CHCN), 2.10-2.14 (m, 4H, CH ), 3.26-3.32 (t, 2H, NCH );
) δ 22.07, 34.22, 38.79, 39,
-1
pound 3 (15.8 g, 95 % ). m.p. 106-108 °C, IR (KBr, νmax, cm ):
1
420, 3050, 2988, 2941, 2810, 1723, 1610, 1475,1462; H
6
2
3
2
NMR (400 MHZ, CDCl ): δ 2.02-2.4 (m, 4H), 3.55-3.8 (m,
3
2
2
1
3
13
2
H), 4-4.2 (m, CH
2
Cl), 4.65 (m, H, CHCOOH); C NMR (75
C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d
6
6
) : δ 22, 24.5, 28.5, 31.5, 41.6, 41.8, 47.2,
MHz, DMSO-d
6
39.21, 39.43, 39.64, 39.85, 40.06, 44.62, 47.09, 47.09, 47.16,
4
7.6, 59.3, 60, 166.2, 166.5, 174.9, 175.1.
Preparation of 1-(2-chloroacetyl)-pyrrolidine-2-carbo-
52.72, 68.39, 120.03, 171.32; MS m/z 304.2 [M + 1], 305.2
13
[M + 2] .
11,12
nitrile (4):Acetonitrile (50 mL), CDMT (homemade , 3.85
g, 3.85 mol), NH HCO (9.12 g, 0.12 mol) and compound 3
3.85 g, 0.02 mol) were added to a 150 mL three-neck flask
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4
3
(
There are several reported approaches to synthesize com-
pound 1shown in Scheme-I, but all the methods more or less
had some disadvantages.Villhauer et al. prepared vildagliptin
which was equipped with a thermometer, a condenser pipe and
a constant pressure funnel. N-Methyl morpholine (2.4 mL,
5
0
.022 mol) was added after the mixture stirred for 10 min.
The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4.5 h
and monitored by TLC (95 % CH Cl -CH OH). After comp-
started from expensive L-prolinamide as shown in route 1. It
involved the expensive and corrosive reagent trifluoro acetic
acid. Moreover, the purity of the target product could be lowered
because the excessive 3-aminoadamantanol was difficult to
be removed. Besides, the reaction time was as long as 6 days
2
2
3
letion of the reaction, the mixture was filtered and the filter
cake was washed with methylene chloride (3 × 40 mL). The
filtrates were collected, combined and concentrated under
vacuum to give some oily mass. To this oily mass was added
DMF (20 mL) and TCT (2 g, 0.011 mol) and the reaction
mixture was then stirred at 40 °C for 4 h. The reaction was
6
and the yield was not reported. Singh et al. synthesized vildag-
liptin not only using the expensive trifluoro acetic acid but
also the unstable DCC as shown in route 2. Furthermore, the
total yield of the target compound was only 18 %. Route 3
7
monitored by TLC (95 % CH
2
Cl
2
-CH OH). After completing
3
was designed by Manne et al. to prepare vildagliptin. The
the reaction, water (100 mL) and ethyl acetate (100 mL) were
added and the organic layer was collected. The aqueous layer
was re-extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). The combined
organic layers were washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate
solution (3 × 30 mL) and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate,
then concentrated under vacuum to give a honey-like residue.
To this residue 15 mL isopropyl ether was added under stirring,
the resulting crystalline solid was filtered and dried at 45 °C
under vacuum to afford compound 4 (2.4 g, 70 %). m.p. 62-
2
use of (Boc) O made the reaction process cumbersome and
the operation complicated. Moreover, it involved large number
of expensive reagents. So it was not suitable for industrial
production. Route 4 was the latest reported method to prepare
8
vildagliptin which was researched by our laboratory . This
method could afford target compound with relatively good
yield and high purity, but it involved four steps and consumed
large amounts of reagents, which made the process complex.
Therefore, it was not the most efficient way to reduce costs.
In our study, we designed a facile and economical method
to afford vildagliptin (1) just with three steps (Scheme-II) using
commercially available and inexpensive raw materials. It was
an optimization and improvement of route 4. It was started
-1
1
6
3 °C, IR (KBr, νmax, cm ): 2952, 2887, 2241, 1655; H NMR
400 MHz, CDCl ): δ 2.15-2.4 (m, 4H, CH ), 3.55-3.65 (m,
), 3.7-3.8 (m, 1H, CH ), 4.075-4.125 (s, 2H, CH Cl),
.725-4.875 (m, 1H, CHCN); C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d
(
3
2
1
H, CH
2
2
2
13
4
6
)