physical properties di†ered considerably depending on the
substitution mode in the phenylene moieties. It is shown from
the MO patterns of these compounds that such a change is
due to a remarkable di†erence in the extent of the p-
conjugation. In particular, the result for o-PhBT was quite
2
di†erent from those of m- and p-PhBT . The electronic struc-
2
ture of o-PhBT is rather unique and requires more attention.
The LUMO pattern of o-PhBT indicated that its excited
state can be delocalized by interaction between the excited
2
2
and the unexcited bithienyl moieties. The structureless Ñuores-
cence and decrease in lifetime with solvent polarity suggested
a contribution from the charge-transfer state to the singlet
excited state.
Fig. 10 The SÈS overlapping (pointed by an arrow) in the LUMO of
o-PhBT : (a) Pattern seen from the same direction as Fig. 9 and (b)
2
from the right-hand side
This work is a part of the project of Institute for Fundamental
Chemistry, supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of
ScienceÈResearch for the Future Program (JSPS-
RFTF96P00206).
m- and p-PhBT s in a glass matrix at 77 K can be explained
2
by the molecular structure becoming more planar in the
ground state. The change in the Ñuorescence spectra of m- and
References
p-PhBT s is similar to those of TT and pentathiophene.2b In
2
1
(a) G. Horowitz, A. Yassar and H. J. von Bardeleben, Synth. Met.,
1994, 62, 245; (b) J. Guay, P. Kasai, A. Diaz, R. Wu, J. M. Tour
and L. H. Dao, Chem. Mater., 1992, 4, 1097; (c) D. Fichou, G.
Horowitz and F. Garnier, Synth. Met., 1990, 39, 125; (d) D.
Fichou, G. Horowitz, B. Xu and F. Garnier, Synth. Met., 1990,
39, 243; (e) D. Beljonne, J. Cornil, J. L. Bredas and R. H. Friend,
Synth. Met., 1996, 76, 61; ( f ) J. Cornil, D. Beljonne and J. L.
Bredas, J. Chem. Phys., 1995, 103, 842.
m- and p-PhBT s, the Ñuorescence excitation spectra at 77 K
2
and Ñuorescence spectra at room temperature form a good
mirror image, as seen in Fig. 4. These results indicate that
these molecules in the lowest singlet excited state at room
temperature and the ground state at 77 K have similar plan-
arity. However, the observed behaviour of o-PhBT was quite
2
di†erent. The shape of the Ñuorescence band resembles that of
2
(a) D. Grebner, M. Helbig and S. Rentsch, J. Phys. Chem., 1995,
99, 16991; (b) R. S. Becker, J. Seixas de Melo, A. L. Macanita and
F. Elisei, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 18683.
BT at room temperature, as seen in Fig. 3. However, it has
been reported that BT showed a well resolved spectrum at 77
K.2b This indicates that the di†used absorption and emission
3
4
A. Aviram, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 5687.
bands observed for o-PhBT do not come from the inter-ring
T. Sato, H. Ino, M. Fujitsuka and K. Tanaka, T etrahedron L ett.,
1997, 38, 6039.
2
rotation of bithienyl moieties.
5
6
7
Y. Kanemitsu, K. Suzuki, Y. Masumoto, Y. Tomiuchi, Y. Shi-
raishi and M. Kuroda, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 50, 2301.
The absorption, Ñuorescence and transient absorption of m-
and p-PhBT s can be interpreted in terms of the extent of
2
J. Guay, A. Diaz, R. Wu and J. M. Tour, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993,
115, 1869.
p-conjugation, as discussed in the theoretical analysis. Inci-
dentally, “cuttingÏ of the p-conjugation observed in m-PhBT
has also been seen in the polymer prepared by its electro-
(a) M. Kuroda, J. Nakayama, M. Hoshino and N. Furusho,
T etrahedron L ett., 1992, 33, 7553; (b) M. Kuroda, J. Nakayama,
M. Hoshino, N. Furusho and O. Shigeru, T etrahedron L ett.,
1994, 35, 3957.
2
chemical polymerization.9c For o-PhBT , unusual behaviour
2
was observed in the absorption, Ñuorescence and transient
8
9
(a) K. Maruyama and A. Osuka, Pure Appl. Chem., 1990, 62,
1511; (b) A. Osuka, S. Nakajima, T. Nagata, K. Maruyama and
K. Toriumi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 582.
(a) R. Danieli, P. Ostoja, M. Tiecco, R. Zamboni and C. Taliani,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1986, 1473; (b) J. Birgerson, K.
Kaeriyama and P. Barta, Adv. Mater., 1996, 8, 982; (c) T. Sato, K.
Hori and K. Tanaka, J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 589.
absorption. It can be considered that the structureless band is
not only due to rotations around the inter-ring bond but also
to quite di†erent characteristics of the excited state of o-
PhBT from those of m- and p-PhBT . The result of the
2
2
StricklerÈBerg equation suggested one-to-one correspondence
of the ground state with the lowest singlet excited state. The
energy gap estimated from the crossing points of the absorp-
tion and Ñuorescence were 3.04, 3.22 and 2.93 eV at room
temperature and 3.04, 3.18 and 2.84 eV at 77 K for o-, m- and
10 K. Tamao, S. Komada, I. Nakajima, M. Kumada, A. Minato and
K. Suzuki, T etrahedron, 1982, 38, 3347.
11 J. Nakayama, T. Konishi, S. Murabayashi and M. Hoshino, Het-
erocycles, 1987, 26, 1793.
p-PhBT , respectively. A decrease in energy gap with decrease
12 S. Chodorowski-Kimmes, M. Beley, J-P. Collin and J-P. Sauvage,
T etrahedron L ett., 1996, 37, 2963.
2
in temperature was observed for m- and p-PhBT . These
2
13 I. G. C. Coutts, H. R. Goldshmid and O. C. Musgrave, J. Chem.
Soc. C, 1970, 488.
results indicate that the p-conjugation is more extended at low
temperature because of the planarity of the structures. On the
14 M. Meyer, J. C. Mialocq and M. Rougee, Chem. Phys. L ett., 1988,
150, 484.
15 S. J. Strickler and R. A. Berg, J. Chem. Phys., 1962, 37, 814.
16 R. Colditz, D. Grebner, M. Helbig and S. Rentsch, Chem. Phys.,
1995, 201, 309.
17 M. J. S. Dewar, E. G. Zoebisch, E. F. Healy and J. J. P. Stewart,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 3902.
18 J. J. P. Stewart, J. Comput. Chem., 1989, 10, 209; MOPAC
V ersion 7.
19 (a) M. Belletete, M. Leclerc and G. Durocher, J. Phys. Chem.,
1994, 98, 9450; (b) M. Belletete, N. Di Cesare, M. Leclerc and G.
Durocher, Chem. Phys. L ett., 1996, 250, 31; (c) C. Quattorocchi,
R. Lazzaroni and J. L. Bredas, Chem. Phys. L ett., 1993, 208, 120;
(d) S. Samdal, E. J. Samuelsen and V. Volden Hans, Synth. Met.,
1993, 59, 259.
other hand, the energy gap of o-PhBT did not change. The
2
energy gap of o-PhBT is intermediate between those of m-
2
and p-PhBT at both room temperature and 77 K. Hence, the
p-conjugation in o-PhBT is more extended than that of m-
PhBT . However, this extension is not due to an increase in
the planarity in the excited state, as shown by the structureless
2
2
2
Ñuorescence spectra. The overlap of p orbitals on the adjacent
sulfur atoms indicated that the excited state of o-PhBT could
2
be extended somewhat by interaction between the excited and
the unexcited bithienyl moieties. The structureless Ñuorescence
and decrease in lifetime with the solvent polarity suggested a
contribution from the charge-transfer state to the singlet
excited state.
20 P. Bucci, M. Longeri, C. A. Veracini and L. Lunazzi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 1305.
21 K. Fukui and K. Tanaka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1977, 50, 1391.
22 I. B. Berlman, J. Phys. Chem., 1970, 74, 3085.
Conclusion
Three types of PhBT s were successfully synthesized and their
2
photophysical properties were investigated. Their photo-
Paper 8/02514B; Received 2nd April, 1998
2360
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1998, V ol. 94