binaphthyl N,O-ligands,11 which showed much improved
enantioselectivity compared with that of the corresponding
2-dimethylamino-2′-hydroxy-1,1′-binaphthyl.12
prepared from the known O-methyl NOBIN 1115 with
N-triflation followed by demethylation of 12 with BBr3.
The sulfonamido alcohol ligands 10a-c and 13 were
subjected to the ethylation of benzaldehyde with Et2Zn in
the presence of Ti(OiPr)4 in toluene (Table 1). Ligand 10a
In this report, we prepared binaphthyl-based sulfon-
amido alcohols from chiral binaphthol and used them as
ligands for enantioselective Ti(IV)-catalyzed ethylation of
aldehydes.
Table 1. Addition of Diethylzinc to Benzaldehyde Using
Ligands 10a-c and 13
Sulfonamides 10a-c were prepared by conversion of 7
to the amide 8, which was reduced to the amine 9 with LAH
followed by the corresponding sulfonations (Scheme 1).11,13
yielda
(%)
eeb,c
(%)
Scheme 1. Synthesis of
ligand
time
(h)
2-Sulfonamidomethyl-2′-hydroxy-1,1′-binaphthyl Derivativesa
entry
(mol %)
solvent
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10a (5)
10b (5)
10c (5)
13 (5)
10a (3)
10a (1)
10a (1)
10a (1)
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
hexane
CH2Cl2
2
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
99
60
61
79
99
99
99
99
96
34
23
8
96
95
93
99
a Conversion yield (Chiraldex G-TA column). b Determined by chiral
HPLC (Chiralcel OD column). c Absolute configuration assigned by
comparison to the literature.
showed a very high enantioselection with the use of 5 mol
% in toluene (entry 1). With sulfonamides 10b and 10c, much
decreased conversion yields were observed despite the
extended reaction time under the same condition, and the
enantioselections were very poor (entries 2 and 3). As was
expected from the result of using 6, ligand 13 was a very
poor chiral ligand for the ethylation (entry 4). Decreasing
the amount of ligand 10a used resulted in almost the same
conversion yield and enantioselection (entries 5 and 6). By
changing the solvent from toluene or hexane to dichlo-
romethane, almost quantitative conversion and complete
enantioselection were accomplished with the use of only 1
mol % of 10a (entry 8).
With conditions optimized for benzaldehyde, the use of
ligand 10a was extended to the asymmetric ethylation of
other aromatic, aliphatic, and R,â-unsaturated aldehydes
(Table 2). The yields and enantioselectivities for the substi-
tuted benzaldehydes (entries 2-7) and naphthaldehydes
(entries 8 and 9) were all excellent regardless of the position
of substituents. The additions were completed within 2 h at
-25 °C with the use of 3 mol % of ligand 10a, and the
reduced alcohol products, observed in about 2-5% in our
previous study using 2-dialkylaminomethyl-2′-hydroxy-1,1′-
binaphthyl ligand,10 were not detected at all.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) NaCN (0.1 equiv), NH3, MeOH,
70-80 °C, 48 h, 94%; (b) LiAlH4 (4 equiv), THF, reflux, 24 h,
48%; (c) n-BuLi (2 equiv), THF, -78 °C; Tf2O (2 equiv), -78
°C, 1 h; LiOH-H2O (12 equiv), rt, 12 h, 89% (for 10a); (d) Tf2O
(2 equiv), CH2Cl2, -78 °C, 1 h, 92%; (e) BBr3 (3 equiv), CH2Cl2,
69%.
Ester 7 was highly resistant toward ammonia or amide for
the aminolysis to amide 8, but the conversion proceeded
slowly in methanolic ammonia on heating in the presence
of a catalytic amount of NaCN.14 Selective N-sulfonation of
amino alcohol 9 to 10a-c was not possible, probably because
of the intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the amino
and hydroxy groups. Bis-N,O-sulfonation of 9 followed by
the selective hydrolysis of the resulting sulfonate moiety
provided sulfonamides 10a-c. For comparative purpose,
sulfonamide 13, not having the methylene unit of 10a, was
(8) (a) Zhang, F.-Y.; Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8,
3651-3655. (b) Shen, X.; Guo, H.; Ding, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000,
11, 4321-4327.
(9) (a) Kitajima, H.; Ito, K.; Katsuki, T. Chem. Lett. 1996, 343-344.
(b) Kitajima, H.; Aoki, Y.; Katsuki, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70,
207-217.
Excellent reactivity and enantioselection were obtained
with both primary and secondary aliphatic aldehydes (entries
10 and 11) and also with trans-cinnamaldehyde (entry 12).
A slight decrease of enantioselection was observed with
phenylpropargyl aldehyde (entry 13).
(10) Yus, M.; Ramon, D. J.; Prieto, O. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003,
14, 1103-1114.
(11) Ko, D.-H.; Kim, K. H.; Ha, D.-C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3759-3762.
(12) (a) Vyskocil, S.; Jaracz, S.; Smrcina, M.; Sticha, M.; Hanus, V.;
Polasek, M.; Kocovsky, P. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7727-7737. (b)
Bringmann, G.; Breuning, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 667-679.
(13) Ohta, T.; Ito, M.; Inagaki, K.; Takaya, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 1615-1616.
(15) (a) Hattori, T.; Hotta, H.; Suzuki, T.; Miyano, S. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1993, 66, 613-622. (b) Hattoro, T.; Shijo, M.; Sakamoto, J.; Kumagai,
S.; Nakajima, A.; Miyano, S. J. Chem. Res., Miniprint 1995, 124-134.
(14) Hogberg, T.; Strom, P.; Ebner, M.; Ramsby, S. J. Org. Chem. 1987,
52, 2033-2036.
4518
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 23, 2003