is consumed in the intermediate temperature range, near
00 °C. In the high-temperature range, C(s) decreases further
6
so that about 25% is consumed at 800 °C, and above this
temperature, no further C is consumed.
If the results shown in Figure 3 are extended to higher
temperature, radicals are predicted; e.g., at 2000 °C, the
estimated temperature within the ITZ, one obtains 0.02 mol
-
3
-6
3
H, 10 mol CH , and 10 mol OH. The efficient destruction
of refractory organics, e.g., chlorinated compounds, has been
attributed especially to the presence of H (8).
The fate of heteroatoms can be similarly determined. Two
common ones of interest are S and N because of the potential
x x
formation of SO and NO . This problem does not occur with
reverse mode gasification as described herein. The stable
sulfur-containing species predicted during gasification are
FIGURE 4. Diagram illustrating thermodynamic heat balance terms
in reverse mode gasification.
S, COS, and H
2
S (19), and the stable nitrogen-containing
(11).
species are N , HCN, and NH
2
3
From Figure 3, the equilibrium product composition at
a given temperature and 1 bar can be determined. In general,
these data illustrate the thermodynamic driving force for the
process. However, they also allow quantitative predictions
to be made if one assumes that the system comes to
equilibrium at some temperature. The results of our previous
studies generally support this approach. First, the gas product
is combustible, and within certain ranges of operating
parameters, it is possible to get a clean-burning gas product,
i.e., one that burns with a blue flame. This indicates that
larger molecular weight hydrocarbons are present only at
low levels. The gas composition suggests that the temperature
for equilibrium is between 600 and 700 °C. The limits of
combustibility of gases in air (20) are as follows: hydrogen,
A second important thermodynamic consideration is heat
balance in gasification. This can be discussed in terms of the
process diagram shown in Figure 4. Gasification per se as it
occurs within the reactor is described by the vertical process
on the left, where Tex is the exit temperature of the gas product
and ∆exH is the reaction enthalpy, which is the heat lost to
the surroundings during the process. Under adiabatic
a
conditions, i.e., when ∆exH ) 0, Tex equals T , the adiabatic
temperature, which is the highest temperature attainable at
the exit port of the reactor. The sensible heat, -qsens, is that
which must be removed from gas and char products to reduce
g
the temperature from Tex to 25 °C. ∆ H(25 °C) refers to
gasification in the standard state. Finally, burning the gas
mixture releases the (standard state) heat of combustion,
4
-74%; methane, 5-15%; carbon monoxide, 12.5-74.2%.
∆
c
H(25 °C). Idealized incineration produces complete com-
bustion products (CO and H O) with corresponding standard
state ∆ H(25 °C). The unique features of gasification in
Inspection of Figure 3 shows that, for temperatures above
about 400 °C, the equilibrium gas product mixture should
sustain combustion. Second, water is present in the gas
product, and it is conveniently condensed and recycled in
the process. This indicates an equilibrium temperature below
2
2
i
contrast to incineration can be demonstrated numerically
with reference to Figure 4.
Before determining the adiabatic temperature, it is useful
to consider the gas-phase reactions per se. These strongly
exothermic processes lead to very high temperatures in the
gas phase, which would be characterized in the limit of no
vapor-phase heat loss, by an adiabatic flame temperature
8
00 °C. Third, char loss during gasification is typically 10%
or less, which also suggests an equilibrium temperature below
about 700 °C. Temperatures within the ITZ are markedly
higher than these values; in fact to ascribe a temperature to
the ITZ is an oversimplification since exothermic gas-phase
reactions are the primary source of heat, and the heat must
then flow to the interior of the char particles. Direct
measurements with high-temperature thermocouples in-
serted in the ITZ have yielded readings of 1400 °C, but actual
gas-phase temperatures are probably higher; we estimate
(
21), which is typically >2000 °C. This high temperature is
consistent with the observed ITZ and the presence of radicals
as discussed above. However, we will consider the adiabatic
temperature to be that in which heat is allowed to flow to
the char. Since char is present in large excess, the resulting
adiabatic temperature will be lower than the adiabatic flame
temperature.
2
000 °C. Endothermic processes in the reduction zone cause
the temperature to fall rapidly as the gas moves through the
reactor so that the gas normally exits the reactor at about 500
a
T for the model system described above was found with
the use of the thermodynamics software (22) to be 714 °C.
This value serves as a check on the calculation because it
must be above the observed exit temperature, which is about
°
C. The magnitude of these temperatures indicates that
establishment of equilibrium must occur in the reductive
zone. Last, SO and NO in the gas product are generally
x
x
5
00 °C. Next, we consider a nonadiabatic gasification. It is
unobservable, also in accord with the thermodynamic
predictions.
necessary to specify an equilibrium temperature for the
products, which will determine the composition. We will
show below that a reasonable value for the equilibrium
temperature is 650 °C. A typical experimental exit temper-
ature, Tex is 500 °C. The calculated enthalpy values for heat
balance in gasification are then
The quantitative application of these data to gasification
is not obvious because of the complex temperature profile
and also because the kinetics of the chemical reactions are
undoubtedly complex. However, the equilibrium predictions
can be considered with the following rationale. First, the
temperature decreases rapidly as the gases leave the ITZ and
pass through the reductive or cooling zone. Second, the rates
of reaction are highly temperature-dependent, and these will
decrease markedly along the axis of the reactor. Thus, we
consider that, at some position, there is a cutoff temperature,
below which the reaction rates are negligible so that
equilibrium is established at that temperature. As a test of
this approach, experimental gas compositions can be com-
pared with the thermodynamic predictions to determine
whether agreement can be found at some temperature.
∆
exH
-qsens
∆gH(25 °C)
-1466 kJ
∆cH(25 °C)
-5321 kJ
∆iH(25 °C)
-6787 kJ
-819 kJ
-647 kJ
∆
exH, the heat lost to the surroundings during gasification,
is about 12% of ∆ H. The sensible heat qsens, which is that
contained by the products by virtue of these being at elevated
temperature, is about 10% of ∆ H. Both these quantities can
be partially recovered with heat exchangers. An important
i
i
VOL. 33, NO. 17, 1999 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
9
2 9 7 5