H-11, J 6.9), 1.25–1.52 (m, 8H, H-7–H-10), 1.68 (ddd, 1H, H5, J4,5 3.3, J5,6
9.8, J5,5A 14.5), 1.80 (ddd, 1H, H-5A, J5A,6 2.6 J4,5A 9.5), 1.90 (ddt, 1H, H-3,
J3,4 8.5, J2,3 9.5, J3,3A 12.5), 2.38 (m, 1H, H-3A, J3A,4 6.5), 2.55 (m, 2H, H-2),
3.89 (m, 1H, H-6), 4.80 (dddd, 1H, H-4); dC(100 MHz, CDCl3) 13.98 (C-
11), 22.58 (C-9), 25.14 (C-8), 28.52 (C-3), 28.86 (C-2), 31.70 (C-10), 38.02
(C-7), 43.16 (C-5), 68.54 (C-6), 78.10 (C-4), 177.09 (C-1).
genation products obtained with (S)-6. The result is in accord
with the enantioselective hydrogenations of b-diketones with
Ru-BINAP catalysts described in the literature.3,4 Obviously the
alkyl and ester groups are clearly differentiated by the
catalyst.
Work is in progress to expand the described methodology to
other compounds and optimize it by using other catalysts. This
method bears considerable potential for the synthesis of
building blocks, because of the two stereocenters and three
differentiated carbon atoms in an alkyl chain.
1 S. Schulz and R. Nishida, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1996, 4, 341.
2 R. Nishida, S. Schulz, C. H. Kim, H. Fukami, Y. Kuwahara, K. Honda
and N. Hayashi, J. Chem. Ecol., 1996, 22, 949.
3 M. Kitamura, T. Ohkuma, S. Inoue, N. Sayo, H. Komobayashi, S.
Akutagawa, T. Ohta, H. Takaya and R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988,
110, 629.
I thank W. Luttmer for technical assistance. Financial support
from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is gratefully ac-
knowledged.
4 H. Kawano, Y. Ishii, M. Saburi and Y. Uchida, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1988, 35, 87.
5 L. Shao, H. Kawano, M. Saburi and Y. Uchida, Tetrahedron, 1993, 49,
1997.
6 D. J. Ager and S. A. Laneman, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1997, 8,
3327.
7 K. Mashima, K. Kusano, M. Sato, Y. Matsumura, K. Nozaki, H.
Komobayashi, N. Sayo, Y. Hori, T. Ishizaki, S. Akutagawa, H. O. T.
Takaya and R. Noyori, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 3064.
8 T. Eguchi, K. Arakawa, T. Terachi and K. Kakinuma, J. Org. Chem.,
1997, 62, 1924.
9 A. Hefetz, T. Taghizadeh and W. Francke, Z. Naturforsch., 1996, 51c,
409.
10 C. R. Holmquist and E. J. Roskamp, J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 3258.
11 A. P. Krapcho, Synthesis, 1982, 893.
12 U. S. Racherla and H. C. Brown, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 401.
13 M. J. Rozema, A. Sidduri and P. Knochel, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57,
1956.
Notes and references
† Synthesis of (4S,6S)-6-hydroxyundecan-4-olide: A stainless steel auto-
clave lined with Teflon and equipped with a stirring bar was charged with
200 mg of methyl 4,6-dioxoundecanoate and 5 ml of absolute MeOH. The
solution was freed from air by repeatedly applying and releasing nitrogen
pressure.
Approximately 10 mg of the catalyst (S)-6 was added maintaining a
steady flow of nitrogen to minimize contact with air. Then the autoclave was
closed, a pressure of 40 atm applied, and finally heated to 80 °C for two
days. When all educt was consumed (TLC control), the autoclave was
cooled, the solvent removed, the product taken up in Et2O and finally
filtered over Celite. TLC control showed two spots, corresponding to 8 and
7, which could be separated at this point by chromatography, if desired.
Treatment of the crude mixture with a small amount of TsOH in CH2Cl2
transformed 7 into 8. The product was then purified by chromatography
over silica after removal of TsOH with saturated NaHCO3 solution. Yield:
160 mg (91%); [a]2D2 +64.4 (c 1.30, Et2O); dH(500 MHz, CDCl3) 0.89 (t, 3H,
Communication 9/02022E
1240
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1239–1240