C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
activation and/or allylic oxidation).15 For cyclooctene, in the later
stages of the reaction, the low alkene concentration results in
oxidation of the cis-diol as a competitive process, and continued
addition of excess H2O2 leads to complete oxidation of the cis-diol
formed initially. Maintaining cyclooctene concentration at pseudo-
steady-state levels, however, suppresses overoxidation (Figure S5)
and allows for up to 2000 turnover numbers (TONs) for cis-diol.12
For other substrates, this approach also resulted in an increased
yield of cis-diol and epoxide.12
Scheme 1
In summary, carboxylic acids as cocatalysts allow for both the
suppression of catalase activity and, through the formation of
carboxylate-bridged dinuclear Mn complexes, control over the
selectivity and activity toward cis-dihydroxylation and epoxidation.
To the best of our knowledge, the system 1/2,6-dichlorobenzoic
acid (2000 TONs for cis-cyclooctanediol) is the most active Os-
free cis-dihydroxylation catalyst reported to date.
catalyzed by complex 2 (MnIII2) or 3 (MnII ) (entries 7 and 8) were
remarkably similar to that of the parent “1/CCl3CO2H” system
(entry 1).12
2
Overall, only a very modest effect of the catalyst employed (i.e.,
1, 2, or 3) on reactivity and selectivity was observed (entries 1, 7,
and 8). In contrast, the effect observed on the lag time and selectivity
during the initial phase of the reaction is striking (Figure 2). For
both 2 and 3, a significant reduction in the lag time is observed
together with a reduced selectivity toward cis-dihydroxylation (until
∼90 min) compared with 1. Moreover, a distinct difference in the
reactivity of 2 and 3 during the first ∼90 min of the reaction was
observed, after which all three complexes exhibit similar kinetics
and almost identical spectroscopic features.12 The results indicate
that the reaction involves low-valent dinuclear Mn complexes (e.g.,
2 and 3).
Acknowledgment. We thank Ms. T. D. Tiemersma-Wegman,
Mr. C. Smit, and Ms. A. van Dam for assistance with GC and ESI-
MS analysis, Prof. J. Reedijk for useful discussion, and the Dutch
Economy, Ecology, Technology (EET) program for financial
support.
Supporting Information Available: Analytical, experimental, and
X-ray data for 2 and 3. Mass and UV-vis spectral data. Catalytic
protocols (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
-
Identification of the involvement of CCl3CO2 as a ligand in
(1) (a) Lane, B. S.; Burgess, K. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2457-2473. (b)
Sheldon, R. A.; Kochi, J. K. Metal-Catalyzed Oxidations of Organic
Compounds; Academic Press: New York, 1981. (c) Brinksma, J.; de Boer,
J. W.; Hage, R.; Feringa, B. L. Modern Oxidation Methods; Ba¨ckvall,
J.-E., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; Chapter 10, pp 295-
326. (d) Noyori, R.; Aoki, M.; Sato, K. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1977-
1986. (e) Katsuki T. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 437-444.
(2) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. ReV. 1994,
94, 2483-2547.
(3) (a) Nelson, D. W.; Gypser, A.; Ho, P. T.; Kolb, H. C.; Kondo, T.; Kwong,
H.-L.; McGrath, D. V.; Rubin, A. E.; Norrby, P.-O.; Gable, K. P.;
Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1840-1858. (b) Katsuki,
T.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5974-5976. (c) Sato,
K.; Aoki, M.; Ogawa, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Noyori, R. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 8310-8311. (d) Herrmann, W. A.; Fischer, R. W.; Marz, D. W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Eng. 1991, 30, 1638-1641.
(4) Lane, B. S.; Vogt, M.; DeRose, V. J.; Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 11946-11954.
(5) (a) Fujita, M.; Costas, M.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
9912-9913. (b) Chen, K.; Costas, M.; Kim, J.; Tipton, A. K.; Que, L.,
Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3026-3035. (c) Ryu, J. Y.; Kim, J.;
Costas, M.; Chen, K.; Nam, W.; Que, L., Jr. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1288-
1289.
the catalytically active species implied that both the selectivity and
reactivity may be tunable. This prompted a screening program of
more than 30 substituted alkanoic and benzoic acids, which led to
the identification of more selective cocatalysts than CCl3CO2H
toward the cis-dihydroxylation or epoxidation of cyclooctene, that
is, 2,6-dichlorobenzoic acid and salicylic acid (entries 9 and 10
and Scheme 1). As for CCl3CO2H, for both 2,6-dichlorobenzoic
and salicylic acid carboxylate complexes are formed during the lag
period, indicating that the differences in selectivity and reactivity
observed can be related directly to the nature of the ligating
carboxylate and not to nonspecific pH effects.12 The role of the
proximal hydroxyl group of the salicylate as a hydrogen bonding
or proton source may be key to the increased epoxide selectivity.
Together with CCl3CO2H, these two acids were employed in
the oxidation of a series of alkenes representing key structural
classes (Table S2). As for cyclooctene, for cis-2-heptene either the
cis-diol or the cis-epoxide is obtained as the major product using
2,6-dichlorobenzoic or salicylic acid, respectively (Scheme 1).
Furthermore, retention of configuration (RC)12 for both the cis-
diol (RC > 96%) and epoxide (RC > 95%) is observed, indicating
that the reaction between the alkene and the activated catalyst
proceeds via a concerted pathway.5 While high conversion is
achieved with electron-rich alkenes, electron-deficient alkenes (i.e.,
dimethyl maleate and dimethyl fumarate) give only low reactivity,
indicating that the catalyst is electrophilic in nature.
The very high activity of the present system was found to be its
Achilles’ heel as exemplified in the oxidation of several of the
substrates (e.g., 1-octene, cyclohexene12). In contrast to electron-
deficient alkenes (vide supra), the reduced yields of cis-diol and
epoxide with several of these substrates are not due to low catalyst
activity. Indeed high conversions (70-90% based on substrate) were
observed in almost all cases (Table S2). There are two possible
explanations for this behavior: further oxidation of the cis-diol
formed and/or the involvement of competing oxidation processes
other than cis-dihydroxylation and epoxidation (e.g., C-H bond
(6) White, M. C.; Doyle, A. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 7194-7195.
(7) De Vos, D. E.; De Wildeman, S.; Sels, B. F.; Grobet, P. J.; Jacobs, P. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 980-983.
(8) Brinksma, J.; Schmieder, L.; Van Vliet, G.; Boaron, R.; Hage, R.; De
Vos, D. E.; Alsters, P. L.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
2619-2622.
(9) (a) Hage, R.; Iburg, J. E.; Kerschner, J.; Koek, J. H.; Lempers, E. L. M.;
Martens, R. J.; Racherla, U. S.; Russell, S. W.; Swarthoff, T.; van Vliet,
M. R. P.; Warnaar, J. B.; van der Wolf, L.; Krijnen, B. Nature 1994, 369,
637-639. (b) De Vos, D. E.; Bein, T. Chem. Commun. 1996, 917-918.
(c) Zondervan, C.; Hage, R.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Commun. 1997, 419-
420. (d) De Vos, D. E.; Sels, B. F.; Reynaers, M.; Subba Rao, Y. V.;
Jacobs, P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3221-3224. (e) Berkessel, A.;
Sklorz, C. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7965-7968. (f) Woitiski, C.
B.; Kozlov, Y. N.; Mandelli, D.; Nizova, G. V.; Schuchardt, U.; Shul’pin,
G. B. J. Mol. Catal. A 2004, 222, 103-119.
(10) Tmtacn: N,N′,N′′-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane.
(11) Wieghardt, K.; Bossek, U.; Nuber, B.; Weiss, J.; Bonvoisin, J.; Corbella,
M.; Vitols, S. E.; Girerd J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7398-7411.
(12) See Supporting Information.
(13) Control experiments confirmed that peracid formation, if it occurs, does
not induce any cis-dihydroxylation.
(14) Hage, R.; Krijnen, B.; Warnaar, J. B.; Hartl, F.; Stufkens, D. J.; Snoeck
T. L. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 4973-4978.
(15) Competing oxidation processes make a significant contribution to the
reduced cis-diol/epoxide yield; see Table S3.
JA050990U
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 22, 2005 7991