the material’s energy bandgap. A further improvement in
PCE can be expected if the Jsc of the device can be further
enhanced.
We thank the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan, for
financial support.
Notes and references
1 B. C. Thompson and J. M. J. Frechet, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2008, 47, 58.
2 P. Heremans, D. Cheyns and B. Rand, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42,
1740.
3 M. Helgesen, R. Søndergaard and F. C. Krebs, J. Mater. Chem.,
2010, 20, 36.
Fig. 3 TEM images of a-PTPTBT : PC71BM films before (a) and
after solvent annealing (b). (The scale bar is 200 nm).
4 G. Dennler, M. C. Scharber and C. J. Brabec, Adv. Mater., 2009,
21, 1323.
5 J. Lu, F. Liang, N. Drolet, J. Ding, Y. Tao and R. Movileanu,
Chem. Commun., 2008, 5315.
6 C.-P. Chen, S.-H. Chan, T.-C. Chao, C. Ting and B.-T. Ko, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 12828.
7 C.-Y. Yu, C.-P. Chen, S.-H. Chan, G.-W. Hwang and C. Ting,
Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 3262.
8 S. H. Park, A. Roy1, S. Beaupre, S. Cho, N. Coates, J. S. Moon,
D. Moses, M. Leclerc, K. Lee and A. J. Heeger, Nat. Photonics,
2009, 3, 297.
9 J. Peet, J. Y. Kim, N. E. Coates, W. L. Ma, D. Moses, A. J. Heeger
and G. C. Bazan, Nat. Mater., 2007, 6, 497.
10 M. Wienk, M. Turbiez, J. Gilot and R. A. J. Janssen, Adv. Mater.,
2008, 20, 2556.
The normal blend film [Fig. 3(a)] exhibits morphology
with separated a-PTPTBT domains and PCBM domains;
the fibrillar features of the polymer are clearly seen. In
contrast, the SA film [Fig. 3(b)] reveals that it consists of
well-defined blends of PCBM domains (having grain size
ca. 20–30 nm) surrounded by a-PTPTBT domains. The SA
process optimizes the miscibility of the polymer with PCBM,
leading to better phase separation between polymer chains and
PCBM molecules formation of interpenetrating networks
(IPNs). Furthermore, the morphology of the SA blend film
is much more uniform and there is no large phase separation.
As a result, the SA blend system has preferred IPN morpho-
logy to ensure the efficient charge separation and transport
required in higher cell performance. For the widely investi-
gated P3HT system, in which the fibril-like structure typically,
correlates to the high crystallinity as well as the performance.25
The solvent vapor treatment for P3HT system resulted in fine-
tuned of nanoscale morphology and the enhancement of the
carrier mobility.26–28 Unlike P3HT system, our observation
for a-PTPTBT system is different after SA. To our knowledge,
the correlation between morphology, performance and carrier
mobility is not clear for new designed polymers. For instance,
the use of additive (alkane-dithiols) has resulted in a significant
improvement of performance for a device based on poly[2,6-(4,4-
bis(2-ethylhexyl)-4H-cyclopenta[2,1-b;3,4-b]dithiophene)-alt-4,7-
(2,1,3-benzothiadiazole)] (PCPDTBT).9,29 The well-organized
morphology of the PCPDTBT device was observed in the
presence of an additive. Nevertheless, the hole mobility of the
device showed no increase either from space charge limited
current (SCLC) model29 or FETs9 result. We speculate that
the effect stems from the spatial distribution of donor and
acceptor domains rather than intrinsic differences in carrier
mobilities.9,29 Further study is underway to verify the difference
between these polymers.
11 F. C. Krebs, S. A. Gevorgyan and J. Alstrup, J. Mater. Chem.,
2009, 19, 5442.
12 F. C. Krebs, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2009, 93, 465.
13 L. Blankenburg, K. Schultheis, H. Schache, S. Sensfuss and
M. Schrodner, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2009, 93, 476.
14 M. Jørgensen, K. Norrman and F. C. Krebs, Sol. Energy Mater.
Sol. Cells, 2008, 92, 686.
15 H. Y. Chen, J. Hou, S. Zhang, Y. Liang, G. Yang, Y. Yang, L. Yu,
Y. Wu and G. Li, Nat. Photonics, 2009, 3, 649.
16 Y. Liang, Y. Wu, D. Feng, S.-T. Tsai, H.-J. Son, G. Li and L. Yu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 56.
17 F. C. Krebs, T. D. Nielsen, J. Fyenbo, M. Wadstrøm and
M. S. Pedersen, Energy Environ. Sci., 2010, 3, 512.
18 M. C. Scharber, D. Muhlbacher, M. Koppe, P. Denk, C. Waldauf,
A. J. Heeger and C. J. Brabec, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 789.
19 O. G. Reid, K. Munechika and D. S. Ginger, Nano Lett., 2008, 8,
1602.
20 C. Melzer, E. J. Koop, V. D. Mihailetchi and P. W. M. Blom, Adv.
Funct. Mater., 2004, 14, 865.
21 G. Li, V. Shrotriya, J. Huang, Y. Yao, T. Moriarty, K. Emery and
Y. Yang, Nat. Mater., 2005, 4, 864.
22 W. L. Ma, C. Y. Yang, X. Gong, K. Lee and A. J. Heeger, Adv.
Funct. Mater., 2005, 15, 1617.
23 J. K. Lee, W. L. Ma, C. J. Brabec, J. Yuen, J. S. Moon, J. Y. Kim,
K. Lee, G. C. Bazan and A. J. Heeger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 3619.
24 H. Y. Chen, H. Yang, G. Yang, S. Sista, R. Zadoyan, G. Li and
Y. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 7946.
25 C. W. Chu, H. Yang, W. J. Hou, J. Huang, G. Li and Y. Yang,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 2008, 92, 103306.
26 Y. Yao, J. Hou, Z. Xu, G. Li and Y. Yang, Adv. Funct. Mater.,
2008, 18, 1783.
27 G. Li, Y. Yao, V. Shrotriya and Y. Yang, Adv. Funct. Mater.,
2007, 17, 1636.
28 L. M. Chen, Z. R. Hong, G. Li and Y. Yang, Adv. Mater., 2009,
21, 1434.
To conclude, we have demonstrated high performance OPV
devices by using alternating TPT copolymer. The alternating
TPT polymer shows higher SCLC hole mobility than its
random derivative. We used SA treatment to achieve optimized
bulk hetero-junction morphology. The devices with PCEs up
to 6.4% and high fill factor of over 67% were obtained.
Further investigations are currently underway to fine-tune
29 M. Dante, A. Garcia and T.-Q. Nguyen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009,
113, 1596.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6503–6505 6505