N. Ube et al.
Phytochemistry 184 (2021) 112650
et al. 2019a, 2019b).
external standards to determine the contents of compounds.
5.4. Treatment of barley leaves with chemicals
5.7. Isolation of compounds 1 and 3
We used the following two methods to treat leaves with compounds:
floating method and droplet method. In the floating method, leaf seg-
ments were floated in a solution of compounds containing 0.25%
Tween20 and incubated for 72 h at 25 ◦C with 14-h light/10-h dark
Aerial parts (485 g) of barley seedlings were immersed in a 0.1 mM
CuCl2 solution and incubated at 23 ◦C with 14-h light/10-h dark cycles.
After a 72-h incubation, metabolites in the aerial parts were extracted
with 80% methanol for 24 h, and the obtained extract was evaporated in
vacuo. The residue was partitioned with water and EtOAc, and the EtOAc
layer was evaporated to dryness. The EtOAc extract was subjected to
column chromatography using silica gel (Daisogel IR-60-63/210, Osaka
Soda, Osaka, Japan). The column was eluted with a mixture of acetone
and hexane. The concentration of acetone was increased from 0% to
100% in increments of 10%. Compounds 1 and 3 were detected in the
30% acetone fraction, which was then subjected to ODS column chro-
matography (Cosmosil 75C18-PREP, Nacalai Tesque). The column was
eluted with 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% methanol in water (150 mL each).
Compounds 1 and 3 were eluted in 60% and 70% methanol fractions.
These fractions were combined, evaporated to a small volume, and
subjected to preparative HPLC under the following conditions: column,
Cosmosil 5C18-AR-II (Nacalai Tesque), 10 I.D. × 250 mm; solvents,
water (A) and acetonitrile (B); elution, 60% B/(A + B); flow rate, 3.0
mL/min; detection, 280 nm; column temperature, 40 ◦C. Compounds 1
and 3 were eluted at 14.2 and 17.8 min, respectively.
cycles. In the droplet method, droplets (5 μL) of a solution of compounds
containing 0.25% Tween20 were placed on a barley leaf at 1.0-cm in-
tervals. The seedlings were incubated for 72 h at 25 ◦C with 14-h light/
10-h dark cycles.
5.5. Inoculation of pathogens
The conidia of B. sorokiniana were inoculated to the third leaves of 3-
week-old barley seedlings. Droplets (5 μL) of the conidial suspension (5
× 105 conidia/mL in distilled water containing 0.25% Tween 20) were
placed on a barley leaf at 1.0-cm intervals. Droplets of distilled water
containing 0.25% Tween 20 were also placed on the leaves as a control.
Intact leaves without any treatments were also extracted. The inoculated
seedlings were kept in a moist, air-tight bag for 24 h, and then removed
from the bag and further incubated at 25 ◦C with 14-h light/10-h dark
cycles. The metabolites in the leaves were extracted at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48,
and 72 h after inoculation.
Compound 1 (2ʹ,3,4,4ʹ,6ʹ-pentamethoxychalcone), 1.2 mg; HR-MS
(positive ESI): m/z 359.1487 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C20H23O6, m/z
359.1494); UV–Vis (acetonitrile-water containing 0.1% formic acid):
5.6. Analyses of oxylipins and methoxylchalcones
λ
max 223 and 340 nm; 1H NMR data are shown in Table 1.
Compound 3 (2ʹ-hydroxy-3,4,4ʹ,6ʹ-tetramethoxychalcone), 1.8 mg;
In all analyses, we extracted metabolites in the leaves by immersing
the leaves in 80% methanol for 24 h. The volume of 80% methanol was
fixed at a ratio of 10 mL/g FW leaves. The concentrations of metabolites
in the leaves were calculated under the assumption that the concentra-
tions in the leaves were 10 times higher than those in the extracts.
For the detection of metabolites induced by CuCl2 treatment, the
extracts of CuCl2-treated leaves were analyzed by LC-MS (Quattro Micro
API mass spectrometer connected with Aquity UPLC, Waters). The LC
conditions were as follows: column, Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (Waters),
HR-MS (positive ESI): m/z 345.1331 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C19H21O6, m/z
345.1338); UV–Vis (acetonitrile-water containing 0.1% formic acid):
λ
max 222 and 375 nm; 1H NMR data are shown in Table 1.
5.8. Syntheses of 1 and 3
Compound 1 was synthesized according to the methods described by
Chu et al. (2004). A mixture of 2,4,6-trimethoxyacetophenone (210 mg,
1.0 mmol) and 3,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (191 mg, 1.15 mmol) in 20
mL of anhydrous EtOH was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. A
solution of 50% KOH (40 mL) was added to the mixture and the mixture
was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The resulting solution was
neutralized by the addition of 4 M HCl and extracted with CH2Cl2. The
organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure. The residue was subjected to silica gel
column chromatography (Daisogel IR-60-63-210). The compounds were
eluted with EtOAc/n-hexane (3:7, v/v), and the fraction volume was set
to 5 mL. The fractions containing 1 were combined and concentrated to
give the product (353 mg, 99% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δH:
3.77 (6H, s, OMe × 2), 3.86, 3.90, and 3.91 (3H each, s, OMe × 3), 6.17
(2H, s, H–3,5), 6.84 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz,
H-5′), 7.07 (1H, s, H-2′), 7.09 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′), and 7.29 (1H, d,
J = 16.0 Hz, H-8).
2.1 mm × 50 mm (1.7 μm); flow rate, 0.2 mL/min; column temperature,
40 ◦C; solvents, 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in
acetonitrile (B); gradient, 5%–100% A/(A + B) within 10 min. The MS
scan conditions were as follows: capillary voltage, 3 kV; cone voltage,
20 V; source temperature, 120 ◦C; desolvation temperature, 350 ◦C;
desolvation gas flow, 600 L/h; cone gas flow, 50 L/h; m/z range,
150–1000.
Compounds 1–3 and KODEs were analyzed using LC-MS/MS
(Quattro Micro API mass spectrometer connected with Aquity UPLC,
Waters) coupled with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) methods.
The LC conditions were as follows: column, Acquity UPLC BEH C18
(Waters), 2.1 mm × 50 mm (1.7 μm); flow rate, 0.2 mL/min; column
temperature, 40 ◦C; solvents, 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1%
formic acid in acetonitrile (B); gradient for OPDA, 9-KODE, and 13-
KODE, 40%–80% A/(A + B) within 5 min; gradient for PMC and TMC,
5%–70% A/(A + B) within 10 min. The MRM conditions were optimized
using authentic compounds (Table S1). The amounts of compounds were
determined using external standards.
Compound 3 was synthesized from 2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxyaceto-
phenone (98 mg, 0.5 mmol) and 3,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (96 mg,
0.58 mmol) using the same method utilized for the synthesis of 1. After
extraction with CH2Cl2, the residue of 3 was recrystallized from EtOH
and purified 3 was obtained (54.0 mg, 31% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz,
CDCl3) δH: 3.83, 3.90, 3.92, 3.93 (3H each, s, OMe × 4), 5.95 (1H, d, J =
1.8 Hz, H-5), 6.10 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, H-3), 6.89 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′),
7.21 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 7.25 (1H, s, H-2′), 7.75 (1H, d, J = 15.5
Hz, H-8), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 15.5 Hz, H-7), and 14.40 (1H, bs, –OH).
The amounts of JA and JA-Ile were determined by LC-MS/MS anal-
ysis in the MRM mode with the Shimadzu LCMS-8040 system (Shi-
madzu). The HPLC conditions were as follows: column, Inertsil ODS-4 5
μ
m (GL Sciences, Tokyo, Japan), 4.6 mm × 150 mm; column tempera-
ture, 40 ◦C; solvent, water (A) and acetonitrile (B); gradient, 10% B/(A
+ B) (0–2 min), 10%–100% (2–12 min), 100% (12–13 min); flow rate,
0.4 mL/min. ESI-MS/MS analysis in the MRM mode was performed in
the negative mode. For quantitative analysis of these compounds, ESI-
MS/MS analysis in the MRM mode was performed in the negative
mode for JA and JA-Ile, and the MRM conditions were optimized using
authentic compounds (Table S2). Authentic JA and JA-Ile were used as
5.9. Antifungal activity
The antifungal activities of PMC and TMC for B. sorokiniana and
F. graminearum were evaluated as described by Ube et al. (2019a). The
8