Organic Process Research & Development 2009, 13, 411–414
Full Papers
An Efficient Catalytic Method for the Beckmann Rearrangement of Ketoximes to
Lactams by Cyanuric Chloride and Phosphazene Catalysts
Masaharu Hashimoto, Yasushi Obora, and Yasutaka Ishii*
Department of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Chemistry, Materials and Bioengineering and High
Technology Research Center, Kansai UniVersity, Suita, Osaka 564-8680, Japan
Abstract:
acetonitrile as a key solvent.4 However, they reported that the
yield of 2a from 1a was up to 30% even by the use of 10 mol
% of CNC under refluxing acetonitrile. Quite recently, we have
carried out the one-pot synthesis of lactam 2a via oximation of
cyclohexane using tert-butyl nitrite catalyzed by NHPI.5,6 In
addition, we showed that 1a can be rearranged by the use of
10 mol % of CNC in 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFP)
to 2a (43%) and its condensate (3a) (22%) corresponding to
44% of 2a.6 Triphosphazene, like 1,3,5-triazo-2,4,6-triphos-
phorine-2,2,4,4,6,6-chloride (TAPC), available from commercial
sources, was found to promote efficiently the Beckmann
rearrangement of ketoximes to lactams.7 For example, the
reaction of 1a by TAPC (5 mol %) in HFP gave 2a (40%) and
its condensate (3a) (26%). However, one serious problem of
our method is that HFP, which is much more expensive than
acetonitrile, must be used as a solvent. Thus, a more efficient
method that does not use expensive HFP is necessary to effect
the Beckmann rearrangement of 1a to 2a in a large scale. In
this contribution, we report a very efficient method for the
Beckmann rearrangement of 1a to 2a by using CNC and TAPC
as catalysts. A key of this method is the use of a mixed solvent
of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and toluene (eq 1).
The Beckmann rearrangement of ketoximes to lactams was
successfully achieved by a very small amount of cyanuric chloride
and phosphazene by carrying out the reaction in a mixed solvent
of trifluoroacetic acid and toluene under mild conditions. For
instance, the Beckmann rearrangement of cyclohexanone oxime
was completely performed under the influence of 0.5 mol % of
cyanuric chloride (CNC) or phosphazene (1,3,5-triazo-2,4,6-triph-
osphorine-2,2,4,4,6,6-chloride: TAPC) in a 3:2 mixed solvent of
trifluoroacetic acid and toluene at 70 °C for 4 h to give E-capro-
lactam, which is an important monomer of 6-Nylon, in almost
quantitative yield. The same strategy could be applied to lauro-
lactam synthesis from cyclododecanone oxime.
Introduction
The Beckmann rearrangement of cyclohexanone oxime (1a)
with sulfuric acid to ꢀ-caprolactam sulfate is a very important
commercial process for producing the polymer material 6-ny-
lon.1 In 2005, about 4 million tons of ꢀ-caprolactam sulfate was
manufactured by this method. The drawback of this transforma-
tion is that the resulting lactam sulfate must be treated with a
base such as ammonia to isolate ꢀ-caprolactam (2a). As a result,
a vast amount of undesired ammonium sulfate is simultaneously
produced with lactam. In 2003, Sumitomo Chemical of Japan
industrialized a sulfate-free process for 2a which includes the
conversion of cyclohexanone to 1a upon treatment with H2O2
and NH3 on TS-1 followed by the vapor-phase Beckmann
rearrangement on high-silica zeolite catalyst.2 On the other hand,
Giacomelli et al. have recently reported that cyanuric chloride
(CNC) induces stoichiometrically the Beckmann rearrangement
of ketoximes to lactams.3 Thereafter, Ishihara et al. have applied
a catalytic reaction by using CNC with Lewis acid, ZnCl2, and
Results and Discussion
We previously reported that the rearrangement of 1a by CNC
and TAPC catalysts in HFP gives 2a in satisfactory yields
(Table 1, entries 1 and 2).6,7 These results indicate that a
fluorinated solvent such as HFP is suitable for the rearrangement
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81-6-6368-0793. Fax:
+81-6-6339-4026. E-mail: ishii@ipcku.kansai-u.ac.jp.
(1) Luedeke, V. D. In Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design:
Chemical Processing Handbook; McKetta, J. J., Ed.; Marcel Dekker:
New York, 1978, p 72. (b) Rademacher, H. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry, 5th ed.; Gerhartz, W., Ed.; Wiley: New York,
1987; Vol. A8, p 201. (c) Wessermel, K.; Arpe, H.-J. Industrial Organic
Chemistry, 4th ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003; p 239.
(2) Mantegazza, M. A.; Petrini, G.; Cesana, A. (Enichem Anic S.r.L.). EP
0564040, 1993.
(4) Furuya, Y.; Ishihara, K.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
11240.
(5) Hirabayashi, T.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 1120.
(6) Hashimoto, M.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. Chem. Asian J. 2006, 1, 712.
(7) Hashimoto, M.; Obora, Y.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 2894.
(3) De Luca, L.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu, A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
6272.
10.1021/op800258s CCC: $40.75 2009 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/06/2009
Vol. 13, No. 3, 2009 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
411