12148 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 49, 2001
Niles et al.
concentrations were determined by making dilutions in 0.1 M NaOH
-
1
-1 29
and measuring the absorbance at λ ) 302 nm (ꢀ ) 1670 M cm ).
Acetylation of Guo and Synthesis of 2,3,5-Tri-O-acetyl-[C8-D]-
Guo. Guo (10.2 g, 36 mmol) was acetylated by suspending in a 2:1
v/v pyridine/acetic anhydride mixture until all of the starting material
had been converted into the triacetylated product as determined by
HPLC and ESI-MS. Conversion of Guo into [C8-D]-Guo was achieved
30
as previously reported. Exchange was confirmed by negative ion ESI-
1
1
6
MS and H NMR in DMSO-d . From the H NMR, it was determined
that the product was 92% [C8-D]-Guo and 8% [C8-H]-Guo. Acetylation
was carried out as described above.
Synthesis of 1-(â-D-erythro-Pentofuranosyl)-5-cyanamido-4-ni-
troimidazole (5). To prepare this compound, 2,4,5-tribromoimidazole
3
1
(
1) was reduced to 4-bromoimidazole (2) and nitrated to give 5(4)-
32
bromo-4(5)-nitroimidazole (3), which was subsequently fused with
Figure 1. Summary of products we have confirmed to be formed
during the reaction of peroxynitrite with 3′,5′-di-O-acetyl-dG and
tetra-O-acetyl-ribose to give 1-(2,3,5-tri-O-acetyl-â-D-erythro-pento-
furanosyl)-5-bromo-4-nitroimidazole (4). The latter compound (1.0
33
2
′,3′,5′-tri-O-acetyl-Guo.
g, 2.22 mmol) was allowed to react with cyanamide (0.36 g, 6.66 mmol)
and sodium methoxide (0.28 g, 6.66 mmol) in anhydrous methanol
(45 mL) at room temperature for 2 days, at which time the reaction
was complete as determined by UV/vis spectroscopy and HPLC. For
characterization, 10 mL of the reaction mixture was evaporated to
dryness and taken up in ∼15 mL double distilled water and loaded
onto a C18, 125 Å, 55-105 µm beads (Waters, Milford, MA) column
preequilibrated and washed with a 99/1 water/acetonitrile mixture. The
product eluted as a broad band and was collected in 15 mL fractions.
compound, 6, formed during the reaction of 2′,3′,5′-tri-O-acetyl-
Guo with peroxynitrite. This product, together with 2′,3′,5′-tri-
O-acetyl-8-NO2Guo, gives definitive insights into the mechanism-
-
(
s) of 2′,3′,5′-tri-O-acetyl-Guo oxidation by ONOO . Thus, we
have proposed that the guanine radical is a key intermediate
from which 6 and 2′,3′,5′-tri-O-acetyl-8-NO2Guo are derived.
Furthermore, of potential biological significance is the fact
that 6 is a significant and stable product of 2′,3′,5′-tri-O-acetyl-
Guo oxidation even at low peroxynitrite concentrations and is
likely to arise only from the reaction of 2′,3′,5′-tri-O-acetyl-
Guo with peroxynitrite. Therefore, this compound may be
important in understanding peroxynitrite-induced mutagenesis
and also may serve as a specific biomarker of peroxynitrite-
induced DNA damage.
The third fraction was dried in vacuo and used as the analytical sample.
1
H NMR (D O) δ (ppm) 7.45 (s, 1H, H2), 5.58 (d, 1H, H1′), 4.37 (t,
2
1
H, H2′), 4.13 (t, 1H, H3′), 3.96 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.71-3.58 (m, 2H, H5′
13
and H5′′). C NMR (DMSO-d ) δ (ppm) 146.86 (C4), 133.02 (C5),
6
130.26 (C2), 118.96 (C7), 87.11 (C1′), 85.40 (C4′), 74.70 (C2′), 70.83
-
(C3′), 62.01 (C5′). ESI-MS: 284 (M - H) ; UV/vis: λmax ) 230 nm,
-
4
2
10 nm. HRMS calcd for C H N O
9 10 5 6
84.0632.
[M - H] 284.0631, found
Synthesis of Authentic 1-(â-D-erythro-Pentofuranosyl)-5-guani-
dino-4-nitroimidazole, 6a. The crude reaction mixture containing 5
Experimental Section
(
(
20 mL, 0.44 g, 0.99 mmol) was refluxed with ammonium chloride
1.65 g, 30.8 mmol) for 5 days after which the mixture was cooled
6 2
General. DMSO-d and D O were obtained from Cambridge Isotope
15
and evaporated to dryness in vacuo. The residue was taken up in water
and purified by semipreparative HPLC on a 250 mm × 10 mm, 5 µm
Nucleosil C18 column (Alltech). Ammonium acetate (50 mM) and
acetonitrile were used as solvents A and B, respectively. The column
was eluted isocratically with 1% B for 10 min before a gradient from
Laboratories (Andover, MA); Na NO
2
was from Isotech (Miamisburg,
OH). All solvents were HPLC grade.
Instrumentation. UV/vis measurements were made using an
HP8452 diode array spectrophotometer (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto,
1
13
CA). H NMR spectra were recorded at 500 MHz, and C NMR spectra
proton decoupled), at 125 MHz on an Inova 500 spectrometer (Varian).
1
to 20% B over 10 min was initiated. After a 2 min isocratic wash
(
with 20% B, the eluent composition was restored to 1% B over 3 min.
A flow rate of 4.0 mL/min was used, and products were monitored
1
H COSY and HETCOR experiments were used to aid in the assignment
of sugar and base protons and carbons. High performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) was performed using an HP1100 pump
equipped with a 1090 or an 1100 diode array detector (Hewlett-
Packard). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and
tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) experiments were carried out
using either an HP 5989B (Hewlett-Packard) or TSQ 7000 (Finnigan,
San Jose, CA) mass spectrometer, respectively. Unless stated otherwise,
ESI-MS and ESI-MS/MS spectra were obtained in negative and positive
ion mode using spraying solutions with the composition 78/20 water/
simultaneously at 230, 380, and 410 nm. Approximate yield of 6a was
1
1
4
2
0-15%. H NMR (D
2
O) δ (ppm) 7.59 (s, 1H, H2), 5.56 (d, 1H, H1′),
.37 (t, 1H, H2′), 4.15 (t, 1H, H3′), 3.97 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.72-3.52 (m,
H, H5′ and H5′′). 13C NMR (DMSO-d
6
) δ (ppm) 158.07 (C7), 143.64
(
C4), 133.16 (C5), 129.99 (C2), 87.08 (C1′), 84.77 (C4′), 74.55 (C2′),
+
6
3
3
9.90 (C3′), 60.99 (C5′). ESI-MS: 303 (M + H) . UV/vis: 230 nm,
+
80 nm. HRMS calcd for C H N O
9 15 6 6
03.1059.
[M + H] 303.1053, found
Reaction of 2′,3′,5′-tri-O-Acetyl-guanosine with Peroxynitrite.
′,3′,5′-Tri-O-acetyl-Guo (100 nmol) was reacted with peroxynitrite (5
2
-propanol with 2% ammonium hydroxide or 50/50 water/methanol
2
with 0.05% acetic acid, repsectively.
2 4 3
µmol) in 150 mM KH PO , 25 mM NaHCO , pH 7.2 buffer (1 mL).
1
4
Peroxynitrite Synthesis. N-Peroxynitrite was prepared either by
ozonolysis of an alkaline solution of sodium azide (Fisher) solution27
or by the reaction of isoamyl nitrite (Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI) with
hydrogen peroxide (Fisher) at pH 12-14.28 In the latter case, excess
hydrogen peroxide was removed by passing the peroxynitrite solution
This mixture was purified on a 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm Columbus
C18 column (Phenomenex) using 50 mM ammonium acetate (solvent
A) and acetonitrile (solvent B) as mobile phases. The column was eluted
isocratically with 5% B for 10 min, followed by a gradient from 5 to
4
0% B in 20 min, another isocratic wash with 40% B for 5 min, and
15
through a 7.5 cm × 1.5 cm manganese oxide (Aldrich) column. N-
Peroxynitrite was prepared by reacting 53 µmol of H in 1 M HCl
as previously described. The reaction was
quenched by rapidly adding 35 µL of 5 M NaOH. Peroxynitrite
finally a gradient from 40 to 5% B over 5 min. The flow rate was 1.0
mL/min, and products were monitored simultaneously at 230, 252, and
2 2
O
1
5
29
with 53 µmol of Na NO
2
(30) Agasimundin, Y. S.; Oakes, F. T.; Kostuba, L. J.; Leonard, N. J. J.
Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 2468-2474.
(
27) Pryor, W. A.; Cueto, R.; Jin, X.; Koppenol, W. H.; Ngu-Schwemlein,
(31) Balaban, I. E.; Pyman, F. L. J. Chem. Soc. 1922, 121, 947-958.
(32) Barrio, M. G.; Scopes, D. I. C.; Holtwick, J. B.; Leonard, N. J.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1981, 78, 3986-3988.
(33) Hasan, A.; Lambert, C. R.; Srivastava, P. C. J. Heterocycl. Chem.
1990, 27, 1877-1883.
M.; Squadrito, G. L.; Uppu, P. L.; Uppu, R. M. Free Radical Biol. Med.
1
995, 18, 75-83.
(
(
28) Uppu, R. M.; Pryor, W. A. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 236, 242-249.
29) Hughes, M. N.; Nicklin, H. G. J. Chem. Soc. 1968, 450-452.