F. Molinari et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 15 (2004) 1945–1947
1947
pylideneglycerol (8 g) in dry benzene (50 mL). After 24 h
at room temperature, the reaction mixture was quen-
ched with 150 mL of 5% NaHCO3 solution and the
product extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic ex-
tracts were dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent removed.
The crude product was purified by flash chromatogra-
phy (ethyl acetate/hexane 1/1) yielding 9.35 g of pure
internal standard solution (1-hexanol 2 g/L) in water; the
resulting solution was extracted with ethyl acetate and
analysed. The enantiomeric composition of IPG acetate
and IPG was determined by gas-chromatographic
analysis using a chiral capillary column (diameter
0.25 mm, length 25 m, thickness 0.25 l, DMePeBeta-
CDX-PS086, MEGA, Legnano, Italy). The absolute
configurations of IPG were determined by comparison
with enantiomerically pure samples commercially
available (Sigma–Aldrich).
1
product. H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d 1.38 (s, 3H,
CH3), 1.44 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.12 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.36–3.41
(m, 2H, CH2), 4.01–4.11 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.13–4.19 (m,
1H, CH).
4.3. Optimisation by sequential simplex method
References and notes
The simplex optimisation method was based on
sequential experimental trials guided by the systematic
search strategies of the Multisimplexꢂ 2.0 program
(Multisimplex AB, Karlskrona, Sweden).9 The starting
experiments were selected with levels of each control
variable (substrate concentration, pH, temperature and
biomass concentration) within the following ranges:
pH 4–8, temperature 20–50 ꢁC, substrate concentration
1–5 g/L, biomass concentration 15–30 g/L. The control
responses to be optimised were the molar conversion
after 3 h and the corresponding enantioselectivity factor
(E). Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.
1. Jurczak, J.; Pikul, S.; Bauer, T. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 447–
488.
2. Xia, J.; Hui, Y. Z. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3019–
3021.
3. Hess, R.; Bornscheuer, U.; Capewell, A.; Scheper, T.
Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1995, 17, 725–728.
4. Bianchi, D.; Borsetti, A.; Golini, P.; Cesti, P.; Pina, C.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 817–819.
5. Jaeger, K. E.; Schneidinger, B.; Rosenau, F.; Werner, M.;
Lang, D.; Dijkstra, B. W.; Schimossek, K.; Zonta, A.;
Reetz, M. T. J. Mol. Catal. B 1997, 3, 3–12.
6. Lorenz, P.; Liebeton, K.; Niehaus, F.; Eck, J. Curr. Opin.
Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 572–577.
7. Molinari, F.; Brenna, O.; Valenti, M.; Aragozzini, F.
Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 19, 551–556.
8. Droge, M. J.; Bos, R.; Quax, W. J. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001,
268, 3332–3338.
4.4. Analytical methods
9. Maconi, E.; Potenza, D.; Valenti, M.; Aragozzini, F. Ann.
Microbiol. 1990, 40, 177–186.
10. Walters, F. H.; Parker, L. R.; Morgan, S. L.; Deming, S.
N. Sequential Simplex Optimization; CRC: Boca Raton,
1991.
11. Molinari, F.; Villa, R.; Aragozzini, F.; Leon, R.; Prazeres,
D. M. F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 3003–
3009.
Alcohol and ester concentrations were determined by
gas-chromatographic (GC) analysis on a Carlo Erba
Fractovap GC gas chromatograph equipped with a
hydrogen flame ionisation detector. The column
(3 · 2000 mm) was packed with Carbowax 1540 (10% on
Chromosorb 80–100 mesh). Samples (0.2 mL) were
taken at intervals and added to an equal volume of an